DoD's $341M IGF BIG SAFARI Contract Awarded to L3Harris for Aircraft Parts
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $341,405,623 ($341.4M)
Contractor: L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-11-29
End Date: 2018-12-31
Contract Duration: 397 days
Daily Burn Rate: $860.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF ACAT III BIG SAFARI
Place of Performance
Location: GREENVILLE, HUNT County, TEXAS, 75402
State: Texas Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $341.4 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P. for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF ACAT III BIG SAFARI Key points: 1. The contract value of $341.4M is significant, indicating a substantial investment in aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment. 2. L3Harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The 'NOT COMPETED' status presents a potential risk for overpayment and lack of innovation. 4. The sector is 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing,' a critical component of defense logistics.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's 'NOT COMPETED' status makes a direct pricing assessment difficult. Without competitive bids, it's hard to determine if the $341.4M represents fair market value compared to similar contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, meaning only one source was solicited. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for these aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment.
Public Impact
Ensures continued availability of critical aircraft parts for the Department of the Air Force. Supports L3Harris Technologies' operations and potentially jobs in Texas. Lack of competition may limit access to potentially more innovative or cost-effective solutions from other manufacturers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- Potential for inflated pricing
Positive Signals
- Supports critical defense needs
- Awarded to established company
Sector Analysis
The 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector is vital for maintaining military readiness. Spending in this area is often driven by specific platform needs and long-term sustainment strategies.
Small Business Impact
The awardee, L3Harris Technologies, is a large corporation, and there is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific contract as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' nature of this award warrants scrutiny. Further oversight is needed to ensure the justification for sole-sourcing was robust and that the pricing is reasonable.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Air Force Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition may lead to higher costs.
- Potential for reduced innovation due to single-source award.
- Limited transparency in pricing justification.
- Risk of vendor lock-in.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, tx, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $341.4 million to L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P.. IGF::CT::IGF ACAT III BIG SAFARI
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INTEGRATED SYSTEMS L.P..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $341.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-11-29. End: 2018-12-31.
What was the specific justification for not competing this contract, and was a thorough market research conducted to ensure no other capable sources existed?
The justification for not competing this contract is crucial for understanding the value proposition. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to ascertain if the government received the best possible price and technological solution. A comprehensive market research report would typically detail why alternative sources were not viable, ensuring the sole-source award was truly necessary and in the government's best interest.
How does the $341.4M contract value compare to similar sole-source or competed contracts for comparable aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment?
Benchmarking this $341.4M contract against similar procurements is essential for assessing value. If comparable competed contracts show significantly lower prices for similar scope and quality, it suggests potential overpayment. Conversely, if other sole-source awards in this niche are similarly priced, it might indicate market conditions or unique requirements driving the cost.
What mechanisms are in place to ensure ongoing cost control and performance monitoring for this sole-source contract, given the inherent risks?
Given the sole-source nature, robust oversight is paramount. Mechanisms should include detailed performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and potentially independent cost analyses to validate expenditures. Without competitive pressure, the government must actively manage the contract to prevent scope creep and ensure L3Harris delivers on time, within budget, and to the required specifications.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: L3harris Technologies, Inc
Address: 10001 JACK FINNEY BLVD, GREENVILLE, TX, 75402
Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $374,029,353
Exercised Options: $341,432,489
Current Obligation: $341,405,623
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 103
Total Subaward Amount: $27,518,788
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA862016G3027
IDV Type: BOA
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-11-29
Current End Date: 2018-12-31
Potential End Date: 2018-12-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-07-26
More Contracts from L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P.
- BIG Safari — $660.1M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $579.0M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $371.6M (Department of Defense)
- Java MAN III — $358.6M (Department of Defense)
- Acat III BIG Safari JM Goco — $332.9M (Department of Defense)
View all L3harris Technologies Integrated Systems L.P. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)