Air Force awards $90.3M for airborne networking kits and logistics support to Sierra Nevada Company
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $90,313,123 ($90.3M)
Contractor: Sierra Nevada Company, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-06-16
End Date: 2027-06-15
Contract Duration: 729 days
Daily Burn Rate: $123.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: SPARKS, WASHOE County, NEVADA, 89434
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $90.3 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC for work described as: AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential price overruns. 2. Limited competition may have resulted in a higher cost than a fully competed contract. 3. The contract duration of 729 days suggests a need for sustained support. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to transfer some risk to the contractor. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336411 points to aircraft manufacturing, indicating specialized requirements. 6. The contract's value is substantial, requiring careful monitoring of performance and costs.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specialized equipment. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to definitively assess if the $90.3 million price represents optimal value for the airborne networking kits and logistics support. The firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the absence of competition means there's less market pressure to drive down prices. Further analysis would require comparing the specific technical capabilities and support provided against similar, albeit likely scarce, sole-source procurements.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, Sierra Nevada Company, LLC, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive bidding process. While sole-source awards can be justified for unique capabilities or urgent needs, they limit price discovery and can potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed procurement. The lack of multiple bidders means taxpayers do not benefit from the cost-saving pressures inherent in a competitive market.
Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for these critical airborne networking capabilities. This could translate to less efficient use of taxpayer funds.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force personnel who will utilize the advanced airborne networking capabilities. The contract ensures the provision of essential mission networking kits and ongoing contractor logistics support. This procurement is critical for enhancing operational effectiveness and communication for airborne platforms. The services delivered will support the Air Force's strategic objectives in maintaining air superiority and global reach. Workforce implications may include specialized technical roles for installation, maintenance, and support of the networking equipment.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to sole-source designation.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical airborne networking systems and support.
- Potential for cost overruns if not closely managed, despite fixed-price structure.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty.
- Contract provides essential logistics support, ensuring system readiness.
- Specialized nature of the equipment suggests a potentially unique capability.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by high technological complexity and significant government investment. This contract falls under the aircraft manufacturing sub-sector (NAICS 336411), which involves the production of aircraft, missiles, and related parts. Spending in this area is driven by national security requirements and technological advancement. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the specialized nature of airborne networking kits, but overall defense spending on C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems represents a substantial portion of the defense budget.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract includes a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature of the award, it is unlikely that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were explicitly mandated or solicited as part of a competitive process. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore minimal for this specific award, as the primary contract is with a large business. Future opportunities might arise if Sierra Nevada Company, LLC, chooses to subcontract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures will be tied to the performance metrics outlined in the contract's statement of work and delivery schedules. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse, but day-to-day oversight focuses on contract compliance and performance.
Related Government Programs
- Airborne Command and Control Systems
- Tactical Data Links
- Military Communications Equipment
- Aircraft Logistics Support Services
- Defense C4ISR Systems
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, sierra-nevada-company-llc, airborne-mission-networking, logistics-support, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, aircraft-manufacturing, nevada, c4isr
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $90.3 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC. AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $90.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-06-16. End: 2027-06-15.
What is Sierra Nevada Company, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in providing airborne networking solutions?
Sierra Nevada Company, LLC (SNC) has a significant track record with the Department of Defense, including the Air Force, across various complex aerospace and defense programs. They are known for their work in areas such as electronic warfare, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), and communication systems. While specific details on past airborne networking kit contracts with SNC would require deeper database analysis, their broader experience in developing and integrating sophisticated electronic systems for military aircraft suggests a capability to fulfill this contract. Their history often involves custom solutions and advanced technology integration, which aligns with the specialized nature of the current award. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract awards for similar systems would provide a more granular understanding of their reliability and expertise in this domain.
How does the $90.3 million contract value compare to similar airborne networking kit procurements, considering it's a sole-source award?
Direct comparison of this $90.3 million sole-source award to similar airborne networking kit procurements is inherently difficult. Sole-source contracts, by definition, lack the price discovery mechanism of competitive bidding, often resulting in higher prices than if multiple vendors had competed. To assess value, one would need to identify comparable contracts, which are likely also sole-source or awarded under highly specialized circumstances. Key factors to consider would include the quantity of kits, the specific technological capabilities (e.g., bandwidth, encryption, interoperability), the duration and scope of contractor logistics support, and the overall system integration complexity. Without access to detailed specifications and pricing structures of potential competitors or past competitive awards for similar, albeit less specialized, systems, a definitive value-for-money assessment remains challenging. The firm-fixed-price nature offers some cost control, but the initial price point is less transparent.
What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical airborne networking systems?
The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical airborne networking systems include: 1. **Higher Costs:** Without competition, the contractor may not be incentivized to offer the lowest possible price, potentially leading to taxpayer overpayment. 2. **Limited Innovation:** The absence of multiple bidders can stifle innovation, as there's less pressure to develop more advanced or cost-effective solutions. 3. **Vendor Lock-in:** The government may become dependent on a single vendor for critical technology and support, making future transitions or upgrades more difficult and expensive. 4. **Reduced Transparency:** Sole-source awards offer less transparency into the justification for the price and the selection process, potentially raising concerns about fairness and efficiency. 5. **Potential for Performance Issues:** While not inherent to sole-source, if the chosen vendor lacks sufficient experience or resources, performance issues could arise, impacting mission readiness.
What is the expected impact of these airborne networking kits on the Air Force's operational effectiveness?
These airborne networking kits are expected to significantly enhance the U.S. Air Force's operational effectiveness by improving real-time data sharing, communication interoperability, and situational awareness among airborne platforms and ground command centers. Enhanced networking capabilities are crucial for modern air operations, enabling faster decision-making, more precise targeting, and improved coordination during complex missions. The contractor logistics support ensures the reliability and readiness of these critical systems, minimizing downtime and maximizing operational availability. Ultimately, these improvements contribute to maintaining air superiority, supporting joint force operations, and achieving mission objectives more efficiently and safely in contested environments.
How does this contract align with broader trends in defense spending on communication and networking technologies?
This contract aligns with a significant and growing trend in defense spending focused on modernizing communication and networking technologies. As military operations become increasingly data-dependent and interconnected, investments in robust, secure, and high-bandwidth airborne networks are paramount. The Department of Defense, including the Air Force, is prioritizing C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) capabilities to maintain a technological edge. Spending on advanced networking solutions, secure data links, and integrated communication systems reflects the strategic imperative to ensure seamless information flow across all domains. This contract for airborne networking kits and logistics support is a direct manifestation of this broader defense spending strategy aimed at enhancing battlefield awareness and command and control.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - NETWORK
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: FA850924R0034
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Sierra Nevada Corporation
Address: 444 SALOMON CIR, SPARKS, NV, 89434
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $90,371,530
Exercised Options: $90,371,530
Current Obligation: $90,313,123
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 36
Total Subaward Amount: $11,949,840
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA850924D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-06-16
Current End Date: 2027-06-15
Potential End Date: 2027-06-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-22
More Contracts from Sierra Nevada Company, LLC
- Survivable Airborne Operations Center (saoc) — $2.6B (Department of Defense)
- SNC Model DO 0001 — $655.3M (Department of Defense)
- Engineering&manufacturing Development — $495.7M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $442.6M (Department of Defense)
- BIG Safari — $429.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)