Air Force awards $90.3M for airborne networking kits and logistics support to Sierra Nevada Company

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $90,313,123 ($90.3M)

Contractor: Sierra Nevada Company, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-06-16

End Date: 2027-06-15

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $123.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: SPARKS, WASHOE County, NEVADA, 89434

State: Nevada Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $90.3 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC for work described as: AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, raising questions about potential price overruns. 2. Limited competition may have resulted in a higher cost than a fully competed contract. 3. The contract duration of 729 days suggests a need for sustained support. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to transfer some risk to the contractor. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 336411 points to aircraft manufacturing, indicating specialized requirements. 6. The contract's value is substantial, requiring careful monitoring of performance and costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specialized equipment. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to definitively assess if the $90.3 million price represents optimal value for the airborne networking kits and logistics support. The firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost certainty, but the absence of competition means there's less market pressure to drive down prices. Further analysis would require comparing the specific technical capabilities and support provided against similar, albeit likely scarce, sole-source procurements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, Sierra Nevada Company, LLC, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive bidding process. While sole-source awards can be justified for unique capabilities or urgent needs, they limit price discovery and can potentially lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed procurement. The lack of multiple bidders means taxpayers do not benefit from the cost-saving pressures inherent in a competitive market.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for these critical airborne networking capabilities. This could translate to less efficient use of taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Air Force personnel who will utilize the advanced airborne networking capabilities. The contract ensures the provision of essential mission networking kits and ongoing contractor logistics support. This procurement is critical for enhancing operational effectiveness and communication for airborne platforms. The services delivered will support the Air Force's strategic objectives in maintaining air superiority and global reach. Workforce implications may include specialized technical roles for installation, maintenance, and support of the networking equipment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by high technological complexity and significant government investment. This contract falls under the aircraft manufacturing sub-sector (NAICS 336411), which involves the production of aircraft, missiles, and related parts. Spending in this area is driven by national security requirements and technological advancement. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the specialized nature of airborne networking kits, but overall defense spending on C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) systems represents a substantial portion of the defense budget.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract includes a small business set-aside. Given the sole-source nature of the award, it is unlikely that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were explicitly mandated or solicited as part of a competitive process. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore minimal for this specific award, as the primary contract is with a large business. Future opportunities might arise if Sierra Nevada Company, LLC, chooses to subcontract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of the Air Force contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures will be tied to the performance metrics outlined in the contract's statement of work and delivery schedules. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse, but day-to-day oversight focuses on contract compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, sierra-nevada-company-llc, airborne-mission-networking, logistics-support, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, aircraft-manufacturing, nevada, c4isr

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $90.3 million to SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC. AIRBORNE MISSION NETWORKING KITS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $90.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-16. End: 2027-06-15.

What is Sierra Nevada Company, LLC's track record with the Department of Defense, particularly in providing airborne networking solutions?

Sierra Nevada Company, LLC (SNC) has a significant track record with the Department of Defense, including the Air Force, across various complex aerospace and defense programs. They are known for their work in areas such as electronic warfare, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR), and communication systems. While specific details on past airborne networking kit contracts with SNC would require deeper database analysis, their broader experience in developing and integrating sophisticated electronic systems for military aircraft suggests a capability to fulfill this contract. Their history often involves custom solutions and advanced technology integration, which aligns with the specialized nature of the current award. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract awards for similar systems would provide a more granular understanding of their reliability and expertise in this domain.

How does the $90.3 million contract value compare to similar airborne networking kit procurements, considering it's a sole-source award?

Direct comparison of this $90.3 million sole-source award to similar airborne networking kit procurements is inherently difficult. Sole-source contracts, by definition, lack the price discovery mechanism of competitive bidding, often resulting in higher prices than if multiple vendors had competed. To assess value, one would need to identify comparable contracts, which are likely also sole-source or awarded under highly specialized circumstances. Key factors to consider would include the quantity of kits, the specific technological capabilities (e.g., bandwidth, encryption, interoperability), the duration and scope of contractor logistics support, and the overall system integration complexity. Without access to detailed specifications and pricing structures of potential competitors or past competitive awards for similar, albeit less specialized, systems, a definitive value-for-money assessment remains challenging. The firm-fixed-price nature offers some cost control, but the initial price point is less transparent.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical airborne networking systems?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical airborne networking systems include: 1. **Higher Costs:** Without competition, the contractor may not be incentivized to offer the lowest possible price, potentially leading to taxpayer overpayment. 2. **Limited Innovation:** The absence of multiple bidders can stifle innovation, as there's less pressure to develop more advanced or cost-effective solutions. 3. **Vendor Lock-in:** The government may become dependent on a single vendor for critical technology and support, making future transitions or upgrades more difficult and expensive. 4. **Reduced Transparency:** Sole-source awards offer less transparency into the justification for the price and the selection process, potentially raising concerns about fairness and efficiency. 5. **Potential for Performance Issues:** While not inherent to sole-source, if the chosen vendor lacks sufficient experience or resources, performance issues could arise, impacting mission readiness.

What is the expected impact of these airborne networking kits on the Air Force's operational effectiveness?

These airborne networking kits are expected to significantly enhance the U.S. Air Force's operational effectiveness by improving real-time data sharing, communication interoperability, and situational awareness among airborne platforms and ground command centers. Enhanced networking capabilities are crucial for modern air operations, enabling faster decision-making, more precise targeting, and improved coordination during complex missions. The contractor logistics support ensures the reliability and readiness of these critical systems, minimizing downtime and maximizing operational availability. Ultimately, these improvements contribute to maintaining air superiority, supporting joint force operations, and achieving mission objectives more efficiently and safely in contested environments.

How does this contract align with broader trends in defense spending on communication and networking technologies?

This contract aligns with a significant and growing trend in defense spending focused on modernizing communication and networking technologies. As military operations become increasingly data-dependent and interconnected, investments in robust, secure, and high-bandwidth airborne networks are paramount. The Department of Defense, including the Air Force, is prioritizing C4ISR (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance) capabilities to maintain a technological edge. Spending on advanced networking solutions, secure data links, and integrated communication systems reflects the strategic imperative to ensure seamless information flow across all domains. This contract for airborne networking kits and logistics support is a direct manifestation of this broader defense spending strategy aimed at enhancing battlefield awareness and command and control.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - NETWORK

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: FA850924R0034

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Sierra Nevada Corporation

Address: 444 SALOMON CIR, SPARKS, NV, 89434

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $90,371,530

Exercised Options: $90,371,530

Current Obligation: $90,313,123

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 36

Total Subaward Amount: $11,949,840

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA850924D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-06-16

Current End Date: 2027-06-15

Potential End Date: 2027-06-15 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-22

More Contracts from Sierra Nevada Company, LLC

View all Sierra Nevada Company, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending