DoD's $12M Warehousing Contract with Chugach Government Services Raises Concerns Over Competition and Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,984,624 ($12.0M)
Contractor: Chugach Government Services, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-07-31
End Date: 2012-07-31
Contract Duration: 1,827 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: WAREHOUSE AND EQUIPMENT OPERATING EXPENSES
Place of Performance
Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.0 million to CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. for work described as: WAREHOUSE AND EQUIPMENT OPERATING EXPENSES Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Chugach Government Services, Inc. for warehousing and equipment operating expenses totals $11.98 million. 2. Lack of competition is a significant concern, potentially leading to inflated costs and reduced value for taxpayers. 3. The contract's duration of 1827 days (approx. 5 years) spans a considerable period, requiring ongoing scrutiny. 4. The sector is 'Other Warehousing and Storage,' with a PSC code of 493190, indicating specialized services.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
Pricing is difficult to assess without comparable contracts due to the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status. The 'COST NO FEE' contract type suggests costs are reimbursed, but without competitive benchmarks, it's hard to determine if these costs are reasonable.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited or sole-source award. This significantly restricts price discovery and may prevent the government from securing the best possible pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition raises concerns about potential overspending, meaning taxpayers may not be receiving the best value for the $11.98 million allocated.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be paying more than necessary due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration could mask inefficiencies or price increases over time. Limited transparency in pricing makes it difficult for the public to assess the fairness of the expenditure. The specific nature of warehousing and equipment operations means this spending directly supports military readiness.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of Competition
- Cost Reimbursement Contract Type
- Long Contract Duration
- Limited Transparency
Positive Signals
- Essential Service Provided
- Established Contractor
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the 'Other Warehousing and Storage' sector, which is crucial for logistical support within the Department of Defense. Benchmarks for such specialized services are often difficult to establish, especially in remote locations like Alaska, making competitive bidding even more important.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in subcontracting opportunities for this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine any small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'COST NO FEE' contract type requires robust oversight to ensure that all claimed expenses are legitimate and necessary. Without competitive pressure, the Defense Contract Management Agency must diligently audit expenditures to prevent waste.
Related Government Programs
- Other Warehousing and Storage
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for cost overruns
- Limited transparency in pricing
- Long contract duration without re-evaluation
- Reliance on contractor's cost reporting
Tags
other-warehousing-and-storage, department-of-defense, ak, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.0 million to CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.. WAREHOUSE AND EQUIPMENT OPERATING EXPENSES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-07-31. End: 2012-07-31.
What specific warehousing and equipment operating services are covered under this contract, and how were these services valued without competition?
The data indicates the contract covers 'WAREHOUSE AND EQUIPMENT OPERATING EXPENSES' with a Public Service Code (PSC) of 493190. However, the specific breakdown of services and the methodology for valuing them in the absence of competition are not provided. The 'COST NO FEE' structure implies reimbursement of actual costs, but the lack of competitive bidding makes it challenging to ascertain if these costs represent fair market value or if they are potentially inflated.
What are the primary risks associated with a limited competition contract of this magnitude and duration for essential logistical support?
The primary risks include potential cost overruns, reduced service quality, and a lack of innovation. Without competitive pressure, the contractor may have less incentive to control costs or improve efficiency. Furthermore, the government is locked into a single provider for five years, limiting its ability to adapt to changing needs or leverage better offers from other potential suppliers.
How effectively does the 'COST NO FEE' contract type, combined with limited competition, ensure value for taxpayer money in this warehousing context?
The 'COST NO FEE' structure, while covering necessary expenses, inherently relies on the contractor's cost management and the government's oversight. When combined with limited competition, the effectiveness in ensuring taxpayer value is significantly diminished. The government lacks the leverage of competitive pricing, making robust auditing and cost verification by the Defense Contract Management Agency paramount to mitigate risks of overpayment and ensure essential services are procured at reasonable rates.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › Other Warehousing and Storage
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 560 E 34TH AVE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $12,027,655
Exercised Options: $12,027,655
Current Obligation: $11,984,624
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-07-31
Current End Date: 2012-07-31
Potential End Date: 2012-07-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2017-05-15
More Contracts from Chugach Government Services, Inc.
- Site 4 — $114.5M (Department of Defense)
- Operation of Potomac JOB Corps Center With Career Transition Services — $84.9M (Department of Labor)
- Provide Vocational and Academic Services to Youths Aged 16 to 24 Years OLD in a Residential Facility — $53.7M (Department of Labor)
- Services, Facilities Maintenance for Sc-Ofs — $38.7M (Department of Energy)
- Water Wastewater Operation Contract — $24.8M (Department of Defense)
View all Chugach Government Services, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)