DoD's $29M contract for security support services awarded to General Dynamics One Source LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,184,191 ($29.2M)

Contractor: General Dynamics ONE Source LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-03-15

End Date: 2029-02-28

Contract Duration: 1,811 days

Daily Burn Rate: $16.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22042

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC for work described as: SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through benchmarking against similar contracts and market rates. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a robust bidding process. 3. Risk indicators include contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) which can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. 4. Performance context is a multi-year delivery order for security support services. 5. Sector positioning within 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' with a focus on defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of approximately $29.2 million over its period of performance (estimated 1811 days) will be benchmarked against similar security support services contracts awarded by the Department of Defense. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type suggests that while the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs, a fixed fee is added, which can provide some cost control. However, CPFF contracts require diligent oversight to ensure costs remain reasonable and that the fixed fee adequately compensates the contractor for the scope of work.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be full and open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, or specific requirements led to a limited pool of eligible bidders. Further details on the exclusion criteria would be necessary to fully assess the breadth of competition. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation suggests a structured procurement process.

Taxpayer Impact: The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' designation implies that efforts were made to ensure a competitive environment, which generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices. However, the exclusion of certain sources could potentially limit the most competitive offers.

Public Impact

The Department of Defense benefits from enhanced security support services, crucial for operational readiness. Services delivered are likely to include a range of security-related consulting and technical support. Geographic impact is primarily within the purview of the Department of the Air Force, potentially at various installations. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for individuals with security expertise and technical consulting skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under the 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' sector (NAICS 541690). This broad category encompasses a wide array of specialized consulting services. Within the defense sector, such contracts are vital for providing expertise in areas ranging from strategic planning and operational analysis to technical implementation and support. The total contract value of approximately $29.2 million over nearly five years positions it as a significant, but not exceptionally large, award within the context of major defense procurements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside criterion for this contract. This suggests that the primary focus was on full and open competition to secure the best value. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which would typically be detailed in the contract's statement of work or award documentation. Without this, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is unclear, though larger prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized support.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program management office within the Department of the Air Force. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) nature of the contract necessitates robust financial and performance monitoring to ensure costs are allowable and reasonable, and that the fixed fee remains appropriate for the work performed. Transparency is typically maintained through contract databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of ongoing oversight are not publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-air-force, security-support-services, consulting-services, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, multi-year-contract, delivery-order, general-dynamics-one-source-llc, virginia, scientific-and-technical-consulting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.2 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC. SECURITY SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS ONE SOURCE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-03-15. End: 2029-02-28.

What is the historical spending pattern for security support services by the Department of the Air Force?

Analyzing historical spending for security support services by the Department of the Air Force requires access to detailed procurement data over multiple fiscal years. Generally, the DoD, including the Air Force, allocates substantial resources to security-related services, encompassing physical security, cybersecurity, intelligence support, and personnel security. Spending can fluctuate based on geopolitical events, evolving threat landscapes, and shifts in strategic priorities. Contracts for these services often range from short-term, specialized task orders to long-term, comprehensive support agreements. Benchmarking this $29.2 million contract against historical averages for similar services would provide context on whether this award represents a typical investment or a significant deviation.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for similar security support services?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts are often used when the scope of work is not precisely defined or when there is a high degree of uncertainty in the costs involved, such as in research and development or complex service contracts. In this case, the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred and receives a predetermined fixed fee. Compared to Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contracts, CPFF offers more flexibility for the government if requirements change, but it carries a higher risk of cost overruns if not managed diligently. Other types like Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) or Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) introduce performance incentives. For security support services, FFP might be preferred for well-defined tasks, while CPFF or incentive-based cost-plus contracts are used for more complex, evolving requirements where precise cost estimation is challenging.

What specific types of security support services are typically included under NAICS code 541690 for defense contracts?

NAICS code 541690, 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services,' is broad and can encompass a wide array of specialized services for defense contracts. For security support, this could include threat assessment and analysis, security policy development, risk management consulting, physical security system design and integration consulting, cybersecurity strategy development, intelligence analysis support, counter-terrorism consulting, and personnel security vetting process consulting. It generally refers to advisory and analytical services rather than the direct provision of security guards or equipment, though it may involve consulting on the procurement and implementation of such resources. The specific services under this contract would be detailed in its Statement of Work.

What are the potential implications of 'exclusion of sources' in a 'full and open competition' procurement?

The designation 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' indicates that while the procurement was intended to be competitive among all responsible sources, certain entities were excluded from bidding. This exclusion could stem from various reasons, such as specific security clearances required, unique technical capabilities possessed by only a few firms, or prior performance issues with certain contractors. While the intent is to ensure the most suitable contractors are considered, the exclusion of sources can limit the overall pool of potential bidders. This might reduce the intensity of competition, potentially leading to higher prices or fewer innovative solutions compared to a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The specific justification for the exclusion is critical to understanding its impact on value for taxpayers.

What is General Dynamics One Source LLC's track record with similar government contracts?

General Dynamics is a major defense contractor with a long history of performing a wide range of services for the U.S. government, including the Department of Defense. General Dynamics One Source LLC, as a subsidiary or division, likely leverages the parent company's extensive experience. Their track record typically involves large-scale support services, IT solutions, and complex program management. Performance on previous contracts, including any past performance evaluations, award histories, and any significant disputes or terminations, would be crucial for a comprehensive assessment. Accessing contract databases like FPDS or SAM.gov would provide specific details on their past awards, performance ratings, and any reported issues related to similar security support or technical consulting services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA824019R3501

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Wico Limited

Address: 3150 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 100, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $214,066,467

Exercised Options: $214,066,467

Current Obligation: $29,184,191

Actual Outlays: $3,879,633

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 9

Total Subaward Amount: $102,378,136

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: FA824023D3501

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-03-15

Current End Date: 2029-02-28

Potential End Date: 2029-02-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-07

More Contracts from General Dynamics ONE Source LLC

View all General Dynamics ONE Source LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending