HII Mission Technologies Corp awarded $56.5M for advanced software, cyber security, and training environment support to the Navy
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $56,548,585 ($56.5M)
Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-12-11
End Date: 2022-04-05
Contract Duration: 1,576 days
Daily Burn Rate: $35.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: CT 17-1539 ADVANCED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, NETWORKS AND CYBER SECURITY FOR LEADING EDGE TRAINING, NAVY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ENVIRONMENT
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $56.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: CT 17-1539 ADVANCED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, NETWORKS AND CYBER SECURITY FOR LEADING EDGE TRAINING, NAVY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ENVIRONMENT Key points: 1. Contract supports critical Navy training infrastructure, enhancing readiness and technological advancement. 2. Focus on software development, integration, and cybersecurity indicates a need for cutting-edge solutions. 3. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term strategic investment in the training environment. 4. Performance is managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency, indicating robust oversight. 5. The contract falls under Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, highlighting innovation. 6. The award value is substantial, reflecting the complexity and importance of the services required.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $56.5 million over approximately 4 years (December 2017 to April 2022) for advanced software development, integration, and cybersecurity for the Navy Continuous Training Environment appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar R&D contracts for complex systems integration and cybersecurity in defense is challenging due to unique requirements, but the award value is within a typical range for such sophisticated support. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure suggests that while costs are monitored, there is an incentive for the contractor to manage expenses to achieve the fixed fee.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but full and open competition generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and innovation. This approach ensures that the government seeks the best value from the widest possible pool of contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the chances of securing competitive pricing and high-quality services, preventing potential overspending associated with less competitive procurement methods.
Public Impact
Naval personnel benefit from an enhanced and continuously updated training environment, improving their operational readiness. Advanced software, integration, and cybersecurity services are delivered, bolstering the Navy's technological capabilities. The primary geographic impact is within the Navy's training infrastructure, likely supporting multiple bases and operational units. Workforce implications include the need for highly skilled software developers, cybersecurity experts, and systems integrators, potentially creating high-value jobs.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
- The complexity of integrating advanced software and cybersecurity may present technical challenges and risks.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical training environment infrastructure could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that likely yielded good value.
- The contract supports a critical national defense function (training), indicating strategic importance.
- The contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp, is a known entity in the defense sector, suggesting experience.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences, excluding biotechnology. The market for advanced software development, integration, and cybersecurity services for defense applications is highly specialized and competitive. Spending in this area is driven by the need for continuous technological upgrades to maintain a strategic advantage. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the unique nature of military training environments, but significant investments are common for maintaining sophisticated simulation and training platforms.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp, may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services or components, contributing to the broader small business ecosystem within the defense industry.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract is likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), which is responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance metrics, reporting requirements, and payment schedules tied to milestones. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases and reporting, although specific operational details may be sensitive. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Navy Training Systems
- Cybersecurity Services
- Software Development Contracts
- Defense R&D Spending
- Simulation and Training Technology
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure
- Technical complexity and integration risks
- Cybersecurity vulnerabilities in training systems
- Dependence on contractor performance for critical infrastructure
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, navy, research-and-development, software-development, cybersecurity, training-systems, full-and-open-competition, cost-plus-fixed-fee, large-contract, information-technology, virginia
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $56.5 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. CT 17-1539 ADVANCED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, NETWORKS AND CYBER SECURITY FOR LEADING EDGE TRAINING, NAVY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ENVIRONMENT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $56.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-12-11. End: 2022-04-05.
What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp in delivering similar advanced software and cybersecurity solutions for defense clients?
HII Mission Technologies Corp, a subsidiary of Huntington Ingalls Industries, has a significant track record in providing advanced technology solutions, including software development, cybersecurity, and systems integration, to various branches of the U.S. military. They are known for their work on complex platforms and mission-critical systems. While specific details on past performance for the Navy Continuous Training Environment are not publicly detailed in this award notice, their broader portfolio suggests substantial experience in managing large-scale, technologically advanced defense contracts. Their history includes supporting naval aviation, surface warfare, and C5ISR systems, indicating a capability to handle the intricate requirements of advanced training environments. Performance metrics and past performance evaluations are typically considered during the source selection process for such contracts.
How does the $56.5 million award value compare to other contracts for similar advanced training environment support?
Comparing the $56.5 million award value for HII Mission Technologies Corp's support of the Navy Continuous Training Environment requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific technologies involved. Contracts for advanced simulation, virtual training, and cybersecurity integration for military purposes can range widely. For instance, major simulation and training programs can run into hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars over their lifecycle. This $56.5 million contract, spanning approximately four years, suggests a significant but not exceptionally large investment for a specialized R&D and integration effort. It appears to be a moderate-sized award for a critical, ongoing support function within a specific domain, likely reflecting the specialized nature of the Navy's training needs rather than a broad platform acquisition.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary risks associated with this contract include technical challenges in integrating advanced software and cybersecurity solutions, potential cost overruns inherent in Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts, and the risk of contractor performance not meeting evolving training requirements. Mitigation strategies likely include rigorous technical reviews and testing throughout the development and integration phases, strong program management by the Navy and DCMA to monitor costs and schedule, and clearly defined performance metrics and deliverables within the contract. The use of CPFF also necessitates close financial oversight. Furthermore, the full and open competition process aims to select a contractor with a proven ability to manage such complex projects, reducing performance risk.
How effective is the Navy Continuous Training Environment in meeting its objectives, and does this contract contribute to that effectiveness?
The effectiveness of the Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE) is crucial for maintaining operational readiness and adapting to evolving threats. The NCTE aims to provide sailors and units with realistic, immersive, and technologically advanced training scenarios, integrating live, virtual, and constructive elements. This contract, focusing on advanced software development, integration, and cybersecurity, directly contributes to the NCTE's effectiveness by ensuring its underlying technological infrastructure is robust, secure, and up-to-date. By supporting the development and integration of new capabilities and maintaining the security of the environment, this contract helps ensure that training remains relevant, challenging, and representative of real-world operational conditions, thereby enhancing overall naval force preparedness.
What are the historical spending patterns for the Navy Continuous Training Environment or similar training support programs?
Historical spending patterns for the Navy Continuous Training Environment and similar advanced training support programs indicate a consistent and often increasing investment by the Department of Defense. As technology advances and geopolitical landscapes shift, the need for sophisticated training solutions grows. The Navy, in particular, relies heavily on advanced simulation and training to prepare its personnel for complex maritime operations. Spending in this area typically involves significant outlays for software development, hardware integration, cybersecurity, and ongoing maintenance and upgrades. While specific historical figures for the NCTE are not detailed here, defense budgets generally allocate substantial resources to training and simulation technologies, reflecting their critical role in maintaining military readiness and technological superiority.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › OTHER RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: FA807515R0001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Alion Science and Technology Corporation
Address: 4021 EXECUTIVE DR, BEAVERCREEK, OH, 45430
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $59,196,086
Exercised Options: $59,196,086
Current Obligation: $56,548,585
Actual Outlays: $-192,698
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 38
Total Subaward Amount: $22,999,938
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: FA807516D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-12-11
Current End Date: 2022-04-05
Potential End Date: 2022-04-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2023-09-21
More Contracts from HII Mission Technologies Corp
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca18f0067 IS Hereby Awarded to Alion Science and Technology Corporation to Provide Contractor Support to the Joint Capability Embedded Technology Insertion and Integration (jcetii) Remote Sensing Center (RSC) Within the National Capital Region (NCR). the Period of Performance for This to Will BE September 28, 2018 Through September 27, 2023. the Total Value of the to Will BE $769,178,979 — $934.5M (General Services Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract Action IS to Transfer the Administration of This Order From GSA Region 1 to GSA Fedsim — $870.8M (General Services Administration)
- Award of Nite Task Order — $816.6M (Department of Defense)
- THE Purpose of This Action IS to Award a Task Order - Joint Network of Engineering and Emerging Operations (jneeo) — $723.3M (General Services Administration)
- Services 01 JAN 09 to 31 DEC 09 — $684.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)