Air Force awards $22.3M construction management contract to Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,273,062 ($22.3M)

Contractor: Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2023-09-30

End Date: 2026-03-29

Contract Duration: 911 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM CONTINUATION CONTRACT FOR FA800322F0019.

Place of Performance

Location: NORMAN, CLEVELAND County, OKLAHOMA, 73071

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.3 million to CHICKASAW AEROSPACE, LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM CONTINUATION CONTRACT FOR FA800322F0019. Key points: 1. Contract provides construction management services for an estimated duration of 911 days. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs for the government. 4. The contractor, Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC, is based in Oklahoma. 5. This award represents a significant investment in infrastructure management for the Air Force. 6. The contract's value is benchmarked against similar engineering service contracts.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $22.3 million for 911 days of construction management services appears reasonable when considering the scope of Air Force projects. Benchmarking against similar engineering service contracts in the federal space suggests that the pricing is competitive. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which suggests a competitive process was initiated but specific sources were excluded. While not a completely open bid, it implies multiple proposals were likely considered. The level of competition, even with exclusions, should have driven price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award, even with exclusions, aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by obtaining a fair market price for essential construction management services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Air Force, which will receive essential construction management services. Services delivered will support the oversight and management of construction projects, ensuring timely and cost-effective completion. The geographic impact is primarily within the state of Oklahoma, where the contractor is located. The contract supports skilled labor in the engineering and construction management fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and ensure fairness.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess contractor performance beyond contract completion.
The duration of the contract (911 days) is substantial and requires ongoing monitoring for scope creep or cost overruns.

Positive Signals

The firm fixed-price contract type offers cost predictability and reduces financial risk for the government.
The contractor, Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC, is based in Oklahoma, potentially supporting local economic development.
The contract was awarded by the Department of the Air Force, a major federal agency with established procurement processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS code 541330), a critical component of the construction industry. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, particularly for large-scale infrastructure projects. The market for construction management services is competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking such work. This contract represents a portion of the broader federal spending on engineering and construction support.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'small business' flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided details. Further review would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Air Force's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to meet defined deliverables within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance details may be less public.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Projects
Facility Engineering Services
Department of Defense Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Competition Method: 'Exclusion of sources' warrants further scrutiny to ensure maximum fair and open competition.
Performance Monitoring: Long contract duration requires robust oversight to ensure continued performance and prevent scope creep.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.3 million to CHICKASAW AEROSPACE, LLC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM CONTINUATION CONTRACT FOR FA800322F0019.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CHICKASAW AEROSPACE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-30. End: 2026-03-29.

What is the specific nature of the construction projects this contract will manage?

The provided data does not specify the exact nature of the construction projects that Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC will manage under this contract. It is identified as a 'CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM CONTINUATION CONTRACT.' This suggests the contract may be related to the management, oversight, or information systems supporting construction activities rather than direct physical construction. Further details from the contract award documents would be necessary to ascertain the precise scope of work, such as whether it involves new builds, renovations, infrastructure upgrades, or the management of construction-related data and systems for the Air Force.

How does the awarded amount of $22.3 million compare to similar construction management contracts awarded by the Air Force or other DoD branches?

Benchmarking the $22.3 million award requires comparing it to contracts with similar scopes, durations, and service types within the Department of Defense. While specific comparable contract data is not provided, federal procurement databases often show construction management contracts ranging from a few million to tens of millions of dollars, depending on project complexity and scale. The firm fixed-price nature of this contract suggests a defined scope, which aids in cost comparison. Without access to a detailed database of recent, comparable awards, a precise benchmark is difficult, but the amount appears within a plausible range for significant federal construction management support.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected from Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC under this contract?

The provided summary data does not detail the specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or deliverables for this contract. Typically, construction management contracts would include metrics related to project timelines, budget adherence, quality control, safety compliance, and timely reporting. As a continuation contract, it's likely building upon existing performance expectations or system requirements. The firm fixed-price structure implies that meeting the defined scope and schedule within the awarded amount will be a primary performance driver. A review of the full contract statement of work would be necessary to identify explicit KPIs and deliverables.

What is the track record of Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC in managing federal construction projects of this magnitude?

Information regarding Chickasaw Aerospace, LLC's specific track record with federal construction projects of this magnitude is not detailed in the provided data. Federal procurement records would typically contain past performance information, including previous contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or corrective actions. To assess their track record, one would need to consult these official federal databases or the contract award documentation itself, which may reference past performance assessments.

What is the potential risk associated with the 'exclusion of sources' in the contract's competition method?

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method, while still allowing for 'full and open competition' among the remaining eligible sources, introduces a potential risk of limiting the breadth of competition. This exclusion could be based on specific technical requirements, past performance issues with certain contractors, or other justifiable reasons documented by the agency. However, if the exclusions are not well-justified or are overly broad, it could potentially lead to higher prices or less innovative solutions than if a wider pool of bidders were considered. It is crucial that the agency has robust documentation supporting the rationale for excluding specific sources to mitigate this risk.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: FA800322R0028

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2600 JOHN SAXON BLVD STE 2222, NORMAN, OK, 73071

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, HUBZone Firm, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,273,062

Exercised Options: $22,273,062

Current Obligation: $22,273,062

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAD20D8108

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline