DoD's $6.9M JBAB Building 72 Renovation Contract Awarded to Goldbelt Operations Support Services LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $6,898,934 ($6.9M)

Contractor: Goldbelt Operations Support Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-09-29

End Date: 2027-02-08

Contract Duration: 497 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: PKB - DESIGN-BUILD REQUIREMENT. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY WORK NEEDED TO REPAIR AND RENOVATION A COMBINATION OF PLUMBING, HVAC, STRUCTURAL SLAB REPAIRS, RENOVATIONS AND SYSTEM UPGRADES AT BUILDING 72 ON JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING (JBAB).

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20032

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $6.9 million to GOLDBELT OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES LLC for work described as: PKB - DESIGN-BUILD REQUIREMENT. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY WORK NEEDED TO REPAIR AND RENOVATION A COMBINATION OF PLUMBING, HVAC, STRUCTURAL SLAB REPAIRS, RENOVATIONS AND SYSTEM UPGRADES AT BUILDING 72 ON JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING (JBAB). Key points: 1. Contract focuses on comprehensive repairs and upgrades to Building 72 at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. 2. Scope includes plumbing, HVAC, structural slab repairs, and system modernization. 3. The contract is a definitive contract with a firm-fixed-price structure. 4. Project duration spans approximately 497 days, concluding in February 2027. 5. This award represents a significant investment in facility infrastructure at a key military installation. 6. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies and market price discovery.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $6.9 million for a design-build renovation of a significant building at a military installation appears within a reasonable range for such projects. However, without detailed breakdowns of the scope and specific repair needs, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar large-scale facility renovation contracts within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing is competitive. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract shifts risk to the contractor, which can sometimes lead to higher initial bids to account for unforeseen issues.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competition from other qualified contractors. The justification for a sole-source award typically involves specific circumstances, such as the contractor possessing unique capabilities or the need for urgent work that only one entity can fulfill. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery mechanisms that typically occur in a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to a higher price than might have been achieved otherwise.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without multiple offers, there is less assurance that the selected contractor offered the best possible price for the required services.

Public Impact

Military personnel and staff at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling will benefit from improved and modernized facilities. Essential services and operational capabilities at JBAB will be enhanced through upgraded building systems. The project will likely create temporary employment opportunities in the construction sector within the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. The renovation of Building 72 contributes to the long-term sustainability and operational readiness of the military installation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to non-competitive award.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen structural or system issues are more extensive than initially assessed, despite the firm-fixed-price structure.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor is responsible for all work needed for repair and renovation, indicating a comprehensive scope.
Project aims to modernize critical building systems, improving long-term functionality and reducing future maintenance needs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this sector often involves significant investments in maintaining and upgrading government facilities, including military bases, administrative buildings, and research centers. The market for large-scale renovation and design-build projects is competitive, with numerous firms capable of undertaking such work. However, specific requirements, such as those at a secure military installation, can sometimes lead to specialized procurement methods. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar-sized renovation projects at federal facilities can vary widely based on location, complexity, and specific system upgrades required.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. As a sole-source award to a large business (implied by the nature of the contract and contractor name), it is unlikely to directly benefit the small business ecosystem through set-asides. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services, which would be a secondary impact. Further investigation into the contractor's subcontracting plan would be needed to fully assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Air Force, under the Department of Defense. The firm-fixed-price contract structure provides a degree of accountability by placing the responsibility for cost and schedule adherence on the contractor. Transparency may be limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigate any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract. Performance metrics and progress reports will be key mechanisms for monitoring the contractor's execution of the renovation work.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facility Renovation Programs
Military Base Infrastructure Modernization
Design-Build Construction Contracts
Public Building Service (GSA) Construction Projects

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Potential for uncompetitive pricing
Limited transparency in procurement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $6.9 million to GOLDBELT OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES LLC. PKB - DESIGN-BUILD REQUIREMENT. PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY WORK NEEDED TO REPAIR AND RENOVATION A COMBINATION OF PLUMBING, HVAC, STRUCTURAL SLAB REPAIRS, RENOVATIONS AND SYSTEM UPGRADES AT BUILDING 72 ON JOINT BASE ANACOSTIA-BOLLING (JBAB).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOLDBELT OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $6.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-29. End: 2027-02-08.

What is the track record of Goldbelt Operations Support Services LLC in performing similar large-scale federal construction and renovation projects?

Assessing the track record of Goldbelt Operations Support Services LLC is crucial for understanding their capability to successfully execute this $6.9 million renovation project. Information regarding their past performance on similar federal contracts, particularly those involving design-build requirements, complex system upgrades (HVAC, plumbing, structural), and work on secure government installations, would be highly valuable. A review of past performance evaluations, contract completion history, and any documented issues or successes on previous projects would provide insight into their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to schedule and budget. Without this specific performance data, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact that they were selected for this sole-source award.

How does the awarded price of $6.9 million compare to market rates for similar building renovations of this scale and complexity?

The awarded price of $6.9 million for the renovation of Building 72 at JBAB needs to be benchmarked against market rates for comparable projects. This comparison should consider the size of the building, the extent of the required repairs (plumbing, HVAC, structural), the inclusion of system upgrades, and the design-build delivery method. Factors such as geographic location (Washington D.C. metro area, known for higher construction costs) and the specific security requirements of a military base also influence pricing. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns or a formal cost analysis conducted by the agency, it's challenging to definitively state if this price is competitive. However, the absence of competition suggests a potential for the price to be higher than if multiple bids were received.

What specific risks are associated with this sole-source contract award, and how are they being mitigated?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source contract is the lack of competitive pressure, which can lead to inflated pricing and potentially less incentive for the contractor to optimize efficiency or innovation. Another risk is the potential for scope creep or unforeseen issues that could drive up costs, although the firm-fixed-price structure aims to mitigate this by placing cost risk on the contractor. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust government oversight, detailed contract specifications, and clear performance metrics. The agency should have conducted a thorough justification for the sole-source award, ensuring it was indeed necessary and that the proposed price was fair and reasonable based on available market data or historical costs. Regular progress reviews and quality assurance checks are also critical.

What is the expected impact of this renovation on the operational effectiveness and readiness of Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling?

This renovation is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness and readiness of Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling by modernizing critical infrastructure within Building 72. Upgrades to plumbing, HVAC, and structural systems will improve the reliability and efficiency of the building's core functions, reducing the likelihood of disruptions due to system failures. Modernized systems can also contribute to a safer and more comfortable working environment for personnel stationed at the base. By addressing necessary repairs and system upgrades, the project ensures that Building 72 can continue to support the base's mission requirements effectively for years to come, thereby bolstering overall installation readiness.

How does the historical spending on facility maintenance and renovation at JBAB compare to this specific contract award?

To assess the context of this $6.9 million contract, it's important to examine historical spending patterns for facility maintenance and renovation at Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. This would involve analyzing previous contract awards for similar projects, understanding the average cost per square foot for renovations, and identifying trends in the types of upgrades being prioritized. If historical data shows a consistent investment in infrastructure modernization at JBAB, this contract may represent a continuation of those efforts. Conversely, if this award is significantly larger or smaller than typical spending, it might indicate a shift in priorities or a response to a specific, pressing need. Without access to JBAB's historical facilities budget and contract data, a precise comparison is not possible.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13900 LINCOLN PARK DR, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $6,898,934

Exercised Options: $6,898,934

Current Obligation: $6,898,934

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline