DoD's $10.2M Military Housing Maintenance Contract Awarded to Pride Industries Under Non-Competitive Basis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,223,207 ($10.2M)

Contractor: Pride Industries

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-05-01

End Date: 2009-09-29

Contract Duration: 882 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING MAINTENANCE

Place of Performance

Location: TRAVIS AFB, SOLANO County, CALIFORNIA, 94535

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.2 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES for work described as: MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING MAINTENANCE Key points: 1. The contract's value of over $10 million for housing maintenance raises questions about cost-effectiveness given the lack of competition. 2. Awarding the contract on a sole-source basis limits opportunities for price discovery and potentially higher costs for taxpayers. 3. The duration of the contract (882 days) suggests a long-term need for these services, but the non-competitive nature warrants scrutiny. 4. The specific services provided under 'Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings' need further clarification to assess performance benchmarks. 5. The absence of small business set-aside flags indicates potential missed opportunities for smaller contractors in this sector. 6. The contract's performance context is within the Department of Defense, specifically the Air Force, highlighting a critical infrastructure need.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this $10.2 million contract is challenging without comparable sole-source awards for similar military housing maintenance services. The fixed-price nature suggests a defined scope, but the lack of competition prevents a robust assessment of whether the pricing reflects market rates or represents a fair value for the services rendered. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if taxpayers received the best possible price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis, indicating that the Department of Defense did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This typically occurs when only one source is capable of meeting the requirement, or in urgent situations. The lack of a competitive process means that price negotiation and market forces were not leveraged to ensure the most economical award.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there is no competitive pressure to drive down prices. This limits the government's ability to secure the best value for public funds.

Public Impact

Serves military personnel and their families by ensuring the maintenance and habitability of housing facilities. Directly impacts the quality of life for residents on military installations. The services are geographically focused on installations managed by the Department of the Air Force in California. Supports a workforce involved in building maintenance and repair services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to inflated costs.
Limited transparency in the selection of Pride Industries.
Potential for complacency in service delivery due to no competitive threat.

Positive Signals

Addresses a critical need for military family housing maintenance.
Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for a defined scope.
Long-term contract suggests a stable provider for essential services.

Sector Analysis

The military family housing maintenance sector is a critical component of defense infrastructure, ensuring the well-being of service members and their families. This contract falls under the broader building services industry, which includes a wide range of maintenance, repair, and operational support. While specific market size data for military housing maintenance is not readily available, the overall facilities management market is substantial. This contract represents a significant investment in maintaining government-owned or leased housing assets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. This suggests that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited, potentially concentrating the award with a larger entity. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and financial management offices, with potential involvement from the Air Force's Inspector General. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Accountability measures would be defined by the contract's performance work statement and reporting requirements, but the lack of competition reduces external accountability mechanisms.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Operations Support
Facilities Maintenance Services
Government Housing Programs

Risk Flags

Sole-source award limits price competition.
Lack of transparency in procurement justification.
Potential for cost overruns without competitive benchmarking.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.2 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES. MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING MAINTENANCE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIDE INDUSTRIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-05-01. End: 2009-09-29.

What specific services are included under 'Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings' for military family housing maintenance?

The classification 'Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings' (NAICS code 561790) is broad and can encompass a wide array of maintenance and repair activities. For military family housing, this typically includes routine upkeep, preventative maintenance, minor repairs to structural elements, plumbing, electrical systems, HVAC, and groundskeeping. It may also involve responding to resident maintenance requests and ensuring compliance with safety and habitability standards. The precise scope would be detailed in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS), which outlines specific tasks, deliverables, and performance metrics that Pride Industries is obligated to meet. Without the PWS, the exact nature of the services remains generalized.

Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis instead of being competed?

The contract was awarded on a 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' basis. This designation typically implies that the contracting agency, in this case, the Department of the Air Force, determined that only one responsible source was capable of providing the required services. Reasons for this can include unique capabilities, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling needs where competition is impractical, or if the requirement was previously fulfilled under a different contract vehicle that has since expired and cannot be re-competed in time. The specific justification for this sole-source award would be documented in the Justification and Approval (J&A) document, which is usually publicly available through contract databases, though often with redactions.

How does the $10.2 million contract value compare to similar military housing maintenance contracts?

Direct comparison of this $10.2 million contract value to similar military housing maintenance contracts is difficult without knowing the specific scope, duration, and geographic coverage of those other contracts. Military housing maintenance needs can vary significantly based on the age and type of housing, the number of units, and the specific services required (e.g., basic upkeep vs. comprehensive renovation). Furthermore, since this contract was awarded sole-source, its pricing may not be indicative of market rates achievable through competition. To provide a meaningful comparison, one would need to identify contracts with similar service requirements, contract types (e.g., firm-fixed-price), and geographic locations, ideally those awarded competitively.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large maintenance contract on a sole-source basis?

The primary risk associated with sole-source awards is the potential for higher costs due to the absence of competitive bidding. Without competing offers, the government may not achieve the best possible price or value. There's also a risk of reduced innovation and service quality, as the contractor may face less pressure to improve performance when there is no threat of losing the contract to a competitor. Furthermore, sole-source awards can raise concerns about fairness and transparency in the procurement process, potentially leading to perceptions of favoritism or inefficiency. Oversight and robust contract management become even more critical to mitigate these risks.

What is the historical spending pattern for military family housing maintenance by the Department of the Air Force?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for military family housing maintenance by the Department of the Air Force requires access to comprehensive federal procurement data over multiple fiscal years. This specific contract, valued at approximately $10.2 million and awarded in 2007 with an end date in 2009, represents a snapshot of spending during that period. To understand broader trends, one would need to aggregate spending data for similar services (e.g., facility maintenance, housing operations) across various Air Force installations and over several years. This would reveal whether spending in this category has increased or decreased, identify major contractors, and highlight any shifts in procurement strategies, such as a move towards or away from sole-source awards.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Other Services to Buildings and Dwellings

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: FA442706R0003

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10030 FOOTHILLS BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 03

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,234,510

Exercised Options: $10,234,510

Current Obligation: $10,223,207

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline