DoD's $177M Engineering Services Contract with AXIENT LLC Awarded via Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $177,340,677 ($177.3M)

Contractor: Axient LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-03-16

End Date: 2020-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,659 days

Daily Burn Rate: $106.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF RANGE TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806

State: Alabama Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $177.3 million to AXIENT LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF RANGE TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $177.3 million for engineering services. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 3. Contract duration spans over 4 years, from March 2016 to September 2020. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can pose cost control challenges. 5. The primary sector is Engineering Services, a critical component of defense operations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, while allowing flexibility, can lead to higher costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar CPFF engineering services contracts is necessary to assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' suggesting a competitive process was initiated but may have had specific exclusions. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through market forces.

Public Impact

Supports critical Department of the Air Force engineering and technical services. The large contract value indicates a significant investment in defense capabilities. Long-term nature of the contract suggests ongoing support requirements for defense systems. Potential for follow-on work or similar contracts in the engineering services domain.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is crucial for defense agencies requiring specialized technical expertise. Spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on project complexity and duration, but a $177M contract over four years represents a substantial commitment.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this large contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration and cost-plus nature necessitate robust oversight from the Department of Defense to ensure cost efficiency and performance. Regular audits and performance reviews are critical for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, al, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $177.3 million to AXIENT LLC. IGF::CT::IGF RANGE TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AXIENT LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $177.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-03-16. End: 2020-09-30.

What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Air Force's mission objectives?

The contract likely encompassed a range of engineering and technical support services essential for the Air Force's operational readiness and modernization efforts. This could include system design, development, testing, integration, and sustainment engineering for various platforms or programs. The specific contributions would align with the Air Force's strategic goals, such as enhancing aircraft performance, improving communication systems, or developing new defense technologies.

Given the CPFF structure, what measures were in place to control costs and ensure the government received fair value for the services rendered?

With a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract, the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. To ensure fair value, robust oversight mechanisms are crucial. This includes detailed cost accounting standards, regular audits of contractor expenditures, performance metrics tied to the fixed fee, and clear limitations on allowable costs. Effective negotiation of the fee and continuous monitoring of project scope and efficiency are key to mitigating cost overruns.

How did the 'exclusion of sources' in the full and open competition impact the overall competitiveness and final pricing of the contract?

The 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain potential bidders were deliberately excluded based on specific criteria, possibly related to security, capability, or prior performance. This could limit the number of competitive bids received, potentially impacting the final price and the range of innovative solutions available. A thorough review would be needed to understand the justification for these exclusions and their effect on market competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 9

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 360A QUALITY CIRCLE, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806

Business Categories: Category Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $203,286,000

Exercised Options: $203,286,000

Current Obligation: $177,340,677

Actual Outlays: $5,560,278

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 11

Total Subaward Amount: $452,480,129

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADS329

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-03-16

Current End Date: 2020-09-30

Potential End Date: 2021-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-12-22

More Contracts from Axient LLC

View all Axient LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending