DoD awards $524.7M to Boeing for Navigation Systems, contract awarded without competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $524,692,748 ($524.7M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 1987-05-15

End Date: 2008-06-30

Contract Duration: 7,717 days

Daily Burn Rate: $68.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Defense

Place of Performance

Location: TUKWILA, KING County, WASHINGTON, 98108

State: Washington Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $524.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant award to a major defense contractor. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery. 3. Long contract duration suggests potential for cost overruns. 4. Focus on critical navigation systems for defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is substantial, but without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal. The fixed-price incentive structure aims to control costs, but the long duration and sole-source nature warrant scrutiny.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded sole-source, meaning there was no open competition. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as the contractor faces less pressure to offer the most competitive price.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a contract of this magnitude could result in millions of dollars in overspending compared to a competitively bid scenario.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competition. Reliance on a single contractor for critical defense systems poses a long-term risk. The extended contract period could lead to outdated technology if not managed carefully.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on navigation systems. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but often involves high costs due to specialized technology and limited suppliers.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded directly to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award necessitates robust oversight from the Department of Defense to ensure fair pricing and effective performance. Accountability for cost and schedule adherence is crucial given the contract's scale and duration.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

search-detection-navigation-guidance-aer, department-of-defense, wa, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $524.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $524.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1987-05-15. End: 2008-06-30.

What specific factors justified the sole-source award for these navigation systems, and were alternatives thoroughly explored?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs that only one contractor can meet. A thorough review would involve documenting why other potential sources were deemed unsuitable and exploring if any form of competition, even limited, was feasible to ensure the best value for the government.

How will the Department of Defense mitigate the risks associated with a long-term, sole-source contract to prevent cost overruns and ensure technological relevance?

Mitigation strategies include stringent performance metrics, regular cost reviews, and incorporating clauses for technological updates or competitive re-evaluation at key milestones. Robust oversight by contracting officers and technical experts is essential to monitor contractor performance and control costs throughout the contract's lifecycle.

What is the projected return on investment or strategic advantage gained by the government through this significant expenditure on navigation systems?

The strategic advantage lies in ensuring the operational readiness and effectiveness of defense platforms reliant on these advanced navigation systems. The return on investment is measured in enhanced mission success, improved situational awareness, and potentially reduced risk to personnel and assets in complex operational environments.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingNavigational, Measuring, Electromedical, and Control Instruments ManufacturingSearch, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Contractor Details

Address: MAIL STOP 40-72, SEATTLE

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $18,181,936

Exercised Options: $18,181,936

Current Obligation: $524,692,748

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 1987-05-15

Current End Date: 2008-06-30

Potential End Date: 2008-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-07-26

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending