DoD's $194.8M contract for basic research with Orlando Technology Inc. awarded in 2000
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,107,109 ($12.1M)
Contractor: General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2000-07-17
End Date: 2011-03-09
Contract Duration: 3,887 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: 200010!5700!000152!GR15 !AFRL/MNK !F0863000C0013 !A!*!* !20000717!20000417!064811599!064811599!194860813!N!4R854!ORLANDO TECHNOLOGY INC !4565 COMMERCIAL DRIVE SUIT!NICEVILLE !FL!32578!48750!091!12!NICEVILLE !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !0001!+000000562000!N!N!000000000000!AC51!RDTE/WEAPONS-BASIC RESEARCH !A6 !AMMUNITION !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!2!004!B!* !Z!N!Z!* !* !N!C!*!A!A!A!A!A!A!* !*!N!A!C!N!*!*!*!*!*!
Place of Performance
Location: NICEVILLE, OKALOOSA County, FLORIDA, 32578
State: Florida Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC. for work described as: 200010!5700!000152!GR15 !AFRL/MNK !F0863000C0013 !A!*!* !20000717!20000417!064811599!064811599!194860813!N!4R854!ORLANDO TECHNOLOGY INC !4565 COMMERCIAL DRIVE SUIT!NICEVILLE !FL!32578!48750!091!12!NICEVILLE !OKA… Key points: 1. The contract value of $194.8M for basic research in ammunition is substantial. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 3887 days (over 10 years) indicates a long-term project. 4. The sector is R&D, specifically focused on weapons and ammunition.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract was awarded in 2000 and completed in 2011. Without current benchmarks or more detailed cost breakdowns, assessing its pricing against similar contracts is difficult. The 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' note for the Product Service Code adds to the uncertainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery. However, the long duration and specialized nature of the research might have limited the number of truly competitive bids.
Taxpayer Impact: While competition was intended to ensure value, the long-term nature and potential for evolving requirements make a definitive taxpayer impact assessment challenging without further data.
Public Impact
Long-term investment in defense research may yield future technological advancements. The focus on ammunition research has direct implications for national security. The extended contract period suggests a sustained commitment to this research area.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific details on research outcomes and deliverables.
- Potential for cost overruns in long-term R&D projects.
- Difficulty in assessing value for money retrospectively.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition.
- Significant investment in a critical defense R&D area.
- Long-term commitment to technological advancement.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on weapons and ammunition. Defense R&D spending benchmarks can vary widely based on the specific technology and threat landscape.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates the awardee is ORLANDO TECHNOLOGY INC. There is no explicit information provided regarding small business participation or subcontracting in this data snippet.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, with oversight likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. The long duration necessitates ongoing oversight to ensure progress and fiscal responsibility.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of scope creep and cost overruns.
- Lack of specific deliverable details makes value assessment difficult.
- Classified or indiscernible research area hinders transparency.
- Retrospective assessment of pricing and value is challenging due to age.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, fl, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.1 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.. 200010!5700!000152!GR15 !AFRL/MNK !F0863000C0013 !A!*!* !20000717!20000417!064811599!064811599!194860813!N!4R854!ORLANDO TECHNOLOGY INC !4565 COMMERCIAL DRIVE SUIT!NICEVILLE !FL!32578!48750!091!12!NICEVILLE !OKALOOSA !FLORIDA !0001!+000000562000!N!N!000000000000!AC51!RDTE/WEAPONS-BASIC RESEARCH !A6 !AMMUNITION !3000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !8731!3!*!*!*!B!A!*!A !N!U!
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2000-07-17. End: 2011-03-09.
What were the key technological advancements or deliverables achieved through this $194.8M contract over its 10+ year duration?
The provided data does not detail the specific technological advancements or deliverables. The contract's purpose was 'RDTE/WEAPONS-BASIC RESEARCH' with a focus on 'AMMUNITION'. Without access to contract performance reports or final outcome assessments, it's impossible to quantify the specific achievements or their impact on the 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' research area.
How did the 'full and open competition' process ensure optimal pricing for this long-term, specialized R&D effort?
Full and open competition theoretically allows multiple bidders to propose solutions, driving down prices. However, for specialized R&D with long timelines, the initial scope might be broad, and the true cost-effectiveness is realized over time. The 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' structure suggests that while the fee was fixed, the cost of performance could fluctuate, making retrospective price assessment challenging.
Given the contract's completion in 2011, what is the current relevance and effectiveness of the research conducted under this award?
The effectiveness and relevance of research completed over a decade ago are difficult to ascertain without knowing the specific outcomes and how they align with current defense needs. Basic research aims to expand knowledge, and its direct application might not be immediate. The 'NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED' nature of the research further complicates assessing its current impact or effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)
Address: 4565 COMMERCIAL DRIVE SUIT, NICEVILLE, FL, 01
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2000-07-17
Current End Date: 2011-03-09
Potential End Date: 2011-03-09 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-06
More Contracts from General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.
- FY 10 Requirements for Family of Munitions - Hydra-70 2.75-Inch Rocket System — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of FY 14-18 Hydra-70 Rocket System. This Requirement Includes Rockets, Warheads, Motors and Containers, Which Will BE Produced IAW a Government-Provided TDP — $815.7M (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of Active Protection Systems and CLS Support for the Bradley Fighting Vehicle — $383.5M (Department of Defense)
- Vehicle SET (P/N 13004403) — $347.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200602!700012!1700!m67854!commanding General !M6785406D7004 !A!N! !N!0001 ! !20051107!20060530!003567125!003567125!001381284!n!general Dynamics Armament and !128 Lakeside AVE !burlington !vt!05401!10675!007!50!burlington !chittenden !vermont !+000073387414!n!n!000000000000!5810!communications Security Equip and Comps !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !334220!E! !5!B!S! ! !D!20060530!B! ! !n!a!a!u!j!2!002!n!2a!z!n!z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !z!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! !1727!M67854!0001! ! — $320.5M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)