DoD's $26.6M Food Service Contract with PRIDE INDUSTRIES: Long-Term, Non-Competitive Award

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,641,874 ($26.6M)

Contractor: Pride Industries

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2002-05-01

End Date: 2010-09-30

Contract Duration: 3,074 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: TRAVIS AFB, SOLANO County, CALIFORNIA, 94535

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.6 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant long-term contract value of $26.6 million. 2. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and potential cost savings. 3. Extended duration (2002-2010) suggests a stable, potentially entrenched relationship. 4. Focus on food services within the Department of the Air Force.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is substantial, but without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal. The lack of available benchmark data for similar contracts makes a direct comparison challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This was a sole-source award, meaning there was no competition. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition likely resulted in higher costs than could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long duration of the contract could indicate a lack of agility in adapting to changing service needs or market prices. Potential for reduced service quality if contractor faces no competitive pressure.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Sole-source award
Long contract duration
Lack of competition
No benchmark data

Positive Signals

Consistent service provider over an extended period

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the food services sector, a common area for government outsourcing. Benchmarks for food service contracts can vary widely based on location, scope, and service level, but competitive bidding typically drives efficiency.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors. The sole-source nature of the award limits opportunities for small businesses to compete for this prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The long duration and sole-source nature of this contract warrant review to ensure continued value and adherence to procurement regulations. Oversight should focus on performance metrics and justification for non-competitive awards.

Related Government Programs

Food Service Contractors
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Air Force Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for overpayment due to lack of competition
Lack of transparency in award justification
Extended contract duration without clear re-evaluation points
Absence of performance benchmark data for comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.6 million to PRIDE INDUSTRIES. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIDE INDUSTRIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Air Force).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2002-05-01. End: 2010-09-30.

What was the justification for awarding this food service contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was bypassed. Typically, such justifications involve unique capabilities, urgent needs, or a lack of available sources. Without this information, it's impossible to fully assess the necessity of the non-competitive approach and its potential impact on cost-effectiveness.

What performance metrics were used to evaluate PRIDE INDUSTRIES' service delivery over the contract's lifespan?

Evaluating performance metrics is essential for any long-term contract, especially sole-source ones. Key indicators would include food quality, timeliness of service, client satisfaction (e.g., from Air Force personnel), and adherence to safety and sanitation standards. Without documented performance data, it's difficult to ascertain if the $26.6 million was well-spent or if the contractor met expectations.

Could a competitive bidding process have yielded significant cost savings for the Department of Defense?

Given the $26.6 million value and the sole-source nature of this contract, it is highly probable that a competitive bidding process could have yielded significant cost savings. Competition inherently drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. The absence of this mechanism suggests that the government may have paid a premium for the food services provided.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Accommodation and Food Services › Special Food Services › Food Service Contractors

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 10030 FOOTHILLS BLVD, ROSEVILLE, CA, 03

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline