GSA Awards $42.1M Contract for SC Courthouse Construction to Caddell Construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $42,102,460 ($42.1M)

Contractor: Caddell Construction CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2000-05-15

End Date: 2001-07-21

Contract Duration: 432 days

Daily Burn Rate: $97.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCTION OF US COURTHOUSE, COLUMBIA, SC

Place of Performance

Location: COLUMBIA, RICHLAND County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29201

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $42.1 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. for work described as: CONSTRUCTION OF US COURTHOUSE, COLUMBIA, SC Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value of $42.1 million is a significant investment in federal infrastructure. 3. The project duration of 432 days indicates a substantial construction timeline. 4. The absence of small business participation is noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $42.1 million for a courthouse construction project requires comparison to similar projects to fully assess value. Benchmarking against regional construction costs for similar-sized public buildings would provide better context.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. The price discovery mechanism relies on the bids received from multiple qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for this infrastructure project, with the expectation of a durable and functional federal courthouse.

Public Impact

Provides a new federal courthouse facility for the District of South Carolina. Supports local economic activity through construction jobs and material procurement. Enhances the presence of federal judicial services in Columbia, SC.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Construction projects for federal courthouses fall under the broader government construction sector. Spending benchmarks for such facilities vary widely based on size, complexity, and location. This project's value appears within a typical range for a mid-sized federal building.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that this award did not involve small businesses, either as prime contractors or potentially through subcontracting. Further investigation may be needed to understand if small business participation was sought or achieved.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal building construction. Oversight would typically involve monitoring project progress, quality, and adherence to contract terms to ensure taxpayer funds are used effectively.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

general-services-administration, sc, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $42.1 million to CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.. CONSTRUCTION OF US COURTHOUSE, COLUMBIA, SC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CADDELL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2000-05-15. End: 2001-07-21.

What was the benchmark cost per square foot for this courthouse construction compared to similar federal courthouses?

Without specific details on the square footage and detailed cost breakdowns, a precise benchmark per square foot is difficult to establish. However, the total award of $42.1 million for a federal courthouse suggests a significant investment. Further analysis would require access to project plans and cost data to compare against GSA's historical data for similar facilities.

What were the key factors that led to the selection of Caddell Construction Co., Inc. as the winning bidder?

Under full and open competition, the selection of Caddell Construction Co., Inc. was likely based on a combination of factors including the lowest price offered, technical qualifications, past performance, and adherence to all solicitation requirements. The contracting agency, GSA, would have evaluated proposals against pre-defined criteria to determine the best value.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure cost savings for taxpayers on this courthouse project?

The full and open competition process is designed to encourage multiple bids, thereby fostering price competition and potentially leading to cost savings. The extent of savings is relative to the initial cost estimates and the number and competitiveness of the bids received. A benchmark analysis of the final award price against estimated costs would indicate the effectiveness of the competition.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 2700 LAGOON PARK DRIVE, MONTGOMERY, AL, 02

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Timeline

Start Date: 2000-05-15

Current End Date: 2001-07-21

Potential End Date: 2001-07-21 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-02-27

More Contracts from Caddell Construction CO., Inc.

View all Caddell Construction CO., Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending