Transportation Information Project Support contract awarded to CSRA LLC for over $45.8 million

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $45,846,021 ($45.8M)

Contractor: Csra LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2008-04-29

End Date: 2011-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $41.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: IT

Official Description: TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION PROJECT SUPPORT (TRIPS) CONTRACT DTRT57-06-D-30004 TASK ORDER 4 FOR CONTRACT YEAR 3, MAY 1, 2008 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2009 WITH COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (CSC)

Place of Performance

Location: CAMBRIDGE, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02142

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $45.8 million to CSRA LLC for work described as: TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION PROJECT SUPPORT (TRIPS) CONTRACT DTRT57-06-D-30004 TASK ORDER 4 FOR CONTRACT YEAR 3, MAY 1, 2008 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2009 WITH COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (CSC) Key points: 1. The contract provides IT support services for the Department of Transportation. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of approximately three years indicates a medium-term commitment. 4. The base contract value is substantial, requiring careful performance monitoring. 5. The NAICS code 541519 points to a broad range of computer-related services. 6. The contract was awarded as a delivery order, a common method for task-specific needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific service details and comparable market rates for IT support services in 2008. The reported value of over $45.8 million for a three-year period suggests a significant investment. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables and service levels against industry standards and other government IT contracts of similar scope and duration from that period to assess if the pricing was competitive and represented good value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This typically suggests a robust bidding process with the potential for multiple offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature of the award is expected to drive price discovery and potentially lead to more favorable pricing for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition contracts.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality services, maximizing the value of public funds.

Public Impact

The Department of Transportation benefits from enhanced IT project support, crucial for its operational efficiency. Services delivered likely include IT consulting, system development, and maintenance, supporting various transportation initiatives. The geographic impact is national, as the Department of Transportation's operations span across the United States. The contract supports a workforce of IT professionals, contributing to the technology sector's employment.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader Information Technology services sector, specifically focusing on computer-related services. The market for IT support and consulting services for government agencies is substantial and highly competitive. Contracts like this are essential for agencies to maintain and upgrade their technological infrastructure. Benchmarking would involve comparing the contract's value and scope to other IT support contracts awarded to large system integrators by federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) was not a specific set-aside for this contract. Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if CSRA LLC chose to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans, it's difficult to assess the direct impact on the small business ecosystem, though large prime contracts can sometimes create downstream opportunities.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Transportation's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

transportation, it-services, computer-related-services, department-of-transportation, immediate-office-of-the-secretary-of-transportation, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, large-contract, it-project-support, federal-contract, information-technology, massachusetts

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $45.8 million to CSRA LLC. TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION PROJECT SUPPORT (TRIPS) CONTRACT DTRT57-06-D-30004 TASK ORDER 4 FOR CONTRACT YEAR 3, MAY 1, 2008 THROUGH APRIL 30, 2009 WITH COMPUTER SCIENCES CORPORATION (CSC)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CSRA LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $45.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-04-29. End: 2011-04-30.

What was the specific nature of the 'Other Computer Related Services' provided under this contract?

The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is a broad category encompassing a wide range of IT services not classified elsewhere. For the TRIPS contract, this likely included services such as IT consulting, systems integration, custom software development, IT infrastructure management, and potentially data analysis or support for specific transportation information systems. Without the detailed task order statements, the precise services remain general, but they would have been tailored to support the Department of Transportation's immediate and evolving IT needs during the contract period (2008-2011).

How does the $45.8 million contract value compare to similar IT support contracts awarded by the Department of Transportation around 2008?

Comparing the $45.8 million value requires context regarding the specific IT needs and the duration of similar contracts. In the 2008-2011 timeframe, federal agencies were increasingly investing in IT modernization and support. A contract of this magnitude for three years suggests a significant scope, potentially encompassing enterprise-wide IT support or major project implementation. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify other DOT contracts for IT project support or general IT services awarded during the same period, noting their duration, specific services, and total value to determine if this award was within the expected range for comparable services.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided summary data. However, for an IT support contract of this nature, typical KPIs would likely include metrics related to system uptime, response times for issue resolution, project completion rates, adherence to security protocols, and user satisfaction. SLAs would define the acceptable performance thresholds for these KPIs, often with associated remedies or penalties for non-compliance. These would have been crucial elements defined in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) to ensure the contractor, CSRA LLC, met the Department of Transportation's performance expectations.

What is the track record of CSRA LLC (and its predecessor/successor entities) in performing similar federal IT support contracts?

CSRA LLC, and its predecessor entities (like CSC's government IT services business which was acquired by SRA International, later forming CSRA), has a long history of performing IT support and services for various U.S. federal agencies. They have been involved in numerous large-scale IT contracts across defense, civilian, and intelligence sectors. Their track record generally includes experience in areas like IT modernization, cybersecurity, cloud migration, and application development. Performance on specific contracts can vary, and a detailed review of past performance evaluations and contract close-out reports would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability for this particular TRIPS contract.

Were there any notable risks or challenges identified during the performance of this contract?

Without access to contract performance reports, contract modifications, or any associated contract disputes, it is difficult to identify specific risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this TRIPS contract. However, common risks for large IT support contracts include scope creep, budget overruns, technical challenges in integrating systems, cybersecurity threats, and contractor performance issues. The duration of the contract (three years) also presents a risk of technology obsolescence if not managed proactively. Any significant issues would likely be documented in contract modification histories or performance reviews.

How has spending on IT project support services by the Department of Transportation evolved since this contract was awarded?

Since the award of this TRIPS contract (which concluded in 2011), the Department of Transportation, like all federal agencies, has seen significant evolution in IT spending. There has been a pronounced shift towards cloud computing, agile development methodologies, data analytics, and cybersecurity investments. Spending patterns have likely increased overall due to technological advancements and growing data needs, but with a greater emphasis on modernizing legacy systems, adopting Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) models, and enhancing digital services for the public. The nature of 'project support' has also evolved, incorporating more specialized skills in areas like AI, machine learning, and advanced data science.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesOther Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: OTHER (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (3)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Computer Sciences Corporation (UEI: 009581091)

Address: 7700 HUBBLE DR, LANHAM SEABROOK, MD, 20706

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,846,021

Exercised Options: $45,846,021

Current Obligation: $45,846,021

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DTRT5706D30004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-04-29

Current End Date: 2011-04-30

Potential End Date: 2011-04-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-03-01

More Contracts from Csra LLC

View all Csra LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending