DOT's $12.5M IT Facilities Build Out Contract Awarded to Salient CRGT, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,472,847 ($12.5M)

Contractor: Salient Crgt, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2006-05-12

End Date: 2010-08-27

Contract Duration: 1,568 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: IT

Official Description: IT FACILITIES BUILD OUT

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22153

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $12.5 million to SALIENT CRGT, INC. for work described as: IT FACILITIES BUILD OUT Key points: 1. Contract focused on IT facilities build-out services, indicating a need for infrastructure support. 2. Awarded to a single contractor, raising questions about the extent of competition. 3. The contract duration of over four years suggests a significant, long-term project. 4. Services fall under 'Other Computer Related Services,' a broad category. 5. The contract was a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. Geographic location in Virginia may indicate a specific operational need.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this specific delivery order is challenging without knowing the total value of the parent contract vehicle and the specific services rendered. The raw dollar amount of $12.5 million for IT facilities build-out over approximately four years suggests a moderate investment. Without comparable contract data for similar IT infrastructure projects within the Department of Transportation or other agencies, a definitive value-for-money assessment is difficult. The pricing would need to be evaluated against industry standards for IT facility construction and maintenance.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, suggesting that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid on the task order under a pre-existing contract vehicle. The specific details of the competition, such as the number of bids received and the evaluation process, are not provided in the summary data. However, the 'competitive' designation implies a degree of market engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more favorable pricing compared to sole-source procurements.

Public Impact

The Department of Transportation benefits from enhanced IT facilities, crucial for its operations. Services delivered likely include the setup, maintenance, and upgrade of IT infrastructure. The geographic impact is centered in Virginia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may include IT specialists, construction crews, and project managers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the competitive process limits understanding of true price discovery.
The broad 'Other Computer Related Services' category could mask a wide range of costs and complexities.
The duration of the contract might lead to vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, indicating potential for good value.
The contract addresses a clear need for IT facilities build-out, supporting agency functions.
Salient CRGT, Inc. is a known entity in the federal IT contracting space.

Sector Analysis

The IT facilities build-out sector involves the design, construction, and maintenance of data centers, server rooms, and related IT infrastructure. This contract fits within the broader IT services market, which is a significant segment of federal spending. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large-scale IT infrastructure projects awarded by federal agencies, considering factors like square footage, technology deployed, and service level agreements.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Salient CRGT, Inc., is likely a large business. There is no direct information on subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem from this data alone. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities were mandated or utilized.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Transportation's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance metrics and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS, although detailed performance data may be limited. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

IT Infrastructure Modernization
Data Center Operations
Cloud Computing Services
Network Engineering
Telecommunications Services

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition if the parent contract vehicle had few bidders.
Risk of scope creep in long-term IT infrastructure projects.
Technology obsolescence over the contract duration.
Lack of detailed performance metrics in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $12.5 million to SALIENT CRGT, INC.. IT FACILITIES BUILD OUT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SALIENT CRGT, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Immediate Office of the Secretary of Transportation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-05-12. End: 2010-08-27.

What specific IT facilities build-out services were included under this contract?

The provided data categorizes this award under NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' and describes the purpose as 'IT FACILITIES BUILD OUT.' This broad classification suggests services could encompass a range of activities related to establishing or enhancing IT infrastructure. Potential services include the physical construction or renovation of data centers, server rooms, or network closets; installation of power and cooling systems; cabling infrastructure; physical security enhancements for IT equipment; and potentially the integration of hardware and software within these facilities. Without access to the full contract statement of work, the precise scope and deliverables remain generalized.

How does the $12.5 million cost compare to similar IT facilities build-out contracts?

Directly comparing the $12.5 million cost is challenging without specific details on the scope, duration, and technological requirements of the build-out. However, for context, federal spending on IT infrastructure can vary widely. Large-scale data center construction or major upgrades can run into tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. For a four-year delivery order, $12.5 million suggests a significant but not necessarily massive project, potentially focusing on a specific facility, a regional upgrade, or a particular set of IT infrastructure components. Benchmarking would require analyzing contracts with similar square footage, equipment specifications, and service-level agreements within the federal government.

What is the track record of Salient CRGT, Inc. with the Department of Transportation?

Salient CRGT, Inc. (now part of Peraton) has a substantial history of receiving federal contracts, including with the Department of Transportation (DOT). The data shows this specific delivery order was awarded in 2006 and completed in 2010. Analyzing their broader contract history with DOT would reveal the types of services they have provided, their performance ratings (if available), and the total value of contracts awarded over time. A review of past performance evaluations and contract modifications would offer deeper insights into their reliability and effectiveness in fulfilling DOT's requirements.

What are the potential risks associated with a 'competitive delivery order' for IT facilities build-out?

While 'competitive delivery order' implies a degree of competition, potential risks can still exist. If the underlying contract vehicle itself was not broadly competed or had limited participants, the 'competition' for the delivery order might be constrained. Risks can include insufficient vendor pool leading to less optimal pricing, potential for scope creep if the initial requirements were not clearly defined, and challenges in ensuring consistent quality across different phases of the build-out. Furthermore, the long duration (over 4 years) increases the risk of technology obsolescence or changes in agency needs that may not be fully accommodated by the original terms.

How does the 'Other Computer Related Services' classification impact the understanding of this contract?

The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' is a broad category that encompasses a wide array of IT services not specifically defined under other codes. For this 'IT FACILITIES BUILD OUT' contract, it suggests the services likely extend beyond simple hardware or software installation. It could include IT consulting, systems integration, network design, and project management related to the physical IT infrastructure. The generality of this code means that the specific nature of the work, the expertise required, and the associated costs can vary significantly, making direct comparisons to more narrowly defined IT contracts more difficult.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 LEGATO RD STE 600, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,472,847

Exercised Options: $12,472,847

Current Obligation: $12,472,847

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F0913N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline