ARRA Funds $15.1M for Air Traffic Control Tower Construction in Pennsylvania

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,097,725 ($15.1M)

Contractor: Daniel J Keating CO

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2009-10-15

End Date: 2013-09-06

Contract Duration: 1,422 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: TAS::69 1304::TAS RECOVERY ACT CONSTRUCTION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ARRA::YES::ARRA

Place of Performance

Location: NARBERTH, MONTGOMERY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19072

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $15.1 million to DANIEL J KEATING CO for work described as: TAS::69 1304::TAS RECOVERY ACT CONSTRUCTION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ARRA::YES::ARRA Key points: 1. The contract awarded $15.1 million for industrial building construction. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this contract. 3. The project spanned nearly four years, indicating potential for scope creep or delays. 4. The sector is construction, specifically industrial building. 5. The contract was awarded under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA).

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $15.1 million for a control tower is difficult to benchmark without specific project details. However, the duration of nearly four years suggests a complex project where costs could escalate.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was employed, which generally promotes competitive pricing. The award amount reflects the outcome of this competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for infrastructure development under the ARRA stimulus program, aiming for economic recovery.

Public Impact

Modernization of air traffic control infrastructure enhances safety and efficiency. ARRA funding aimed to stimulate the economy through construction projects. The project's completion contributes to the nation's transportation network.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long project duration (1422 days) may indicate cost overruns or delays.
ARRA projects can sometimes face pressure for rapid deployment, potentially impacting thoroughness.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a potentially efficient use of funds.
Construction of critical infrastructure aligns with economic stimulus goals.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the industrial building construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project scale and complexity. ARRA funding specifically targeted infrastructure projects to boost economic activity.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses participated in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight of ARRA funds was a significant concern. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would have been responsible for monitoring this project's progress and expenditures.

Related Government Programs

Industrial Building Construction
Department of Transportation Contracting
Federal Aviation Administration Programs

Risk Flags

Long project duration
Potential for cost overruns
ARRA funding oversight challenges
Lack of detailed cost breakdown for benchmarking

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $15.1 million to DANIEL J KEATING CO. TAS::69 1304::TAS RECOVERY ACT CONSTRUCTION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER ARRA::YES::ARRA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DANIEL J KEATING CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-15. End: 2013-09-06.

What was the final cost compared to the initial bid or estimated cost?

The provided data shows the awarded amount ($15.1M) but not the initial bid or estimate. Comparing these would reveal if the project stayed within budget or experienced cost growth during its nearly four-year duration, offering insight into cost control effectiveness.

Were there any performance issues or contract modifications during the project?

The duration of 1422 days (nearly 4 years) for a construction project of this nature might suggest potential delays or scope changes. Investigating contract modifications or performance reports would clarify if the project encountered significant challenges impacting its timeline or cost.

How does the cost per square foot or per unit of functionality compare to similar control tower projects?

Benchmarking the cost against similar air traffic control tower projects would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the tower's size, features, and complexity, a direct per-unit cost comparison is not feasible, making it difficult to assess cost-effectiveness definitively.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 134 N NARBERTH AVE, NARBERTH, PA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $125,431,567

Exercised Options: $28,395,725

Current Obligation: $15,097,725

Timeline