DOT's FAA Spends $115.8M on Legacy Communications Equipment from Lockheed Martin

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $115,788,213 ($115.8M)

Contractor: Lockheed Martin Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2009-10-24

End Date: 2015-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,259 days

Daily Burn Rate: $51.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUMMARIZED LEGACY LINES FROM ACQUIRE

Place of Performance

Location: ROCKVILLE, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20850

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $115.8 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLC for work described as: SUMMARIZED LEGACY LINES FROM ACQUIRE Key points: 1. Significant spending on legacy equipment highlights potential for modernization. 2. Sole-source award to Lockheed Martin raises questions about competitive pricing. 3. Long contract duration (2009-2015) suggests outdated technology. 4. Lack of small business participation noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $115.8M over six years is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this represents fair market value compared to similar communications equipment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in a higher price than if multiple vendors had bid, impacting taxpayer funds.

Public Impact

Taxpayers funded a significant amount for potentially outdated communications equipment. The FAA's reliance on a single vendor for this duration may indicate a lack of strategic sourcing or market analysis. Future spending on similar legacy systems could be avoided through proactive technology refresh strategies.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Spending on 'Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing' falls under the broader IT and defense sectors. Benchmarks are difficult without specific equipment details, but large sole-source contracts for legacy items are generally a concern.

Small Business Impact

The contract explicitly states no small business participation (sb: false). This suggests opportunities were missed to engage smaller, innovative companies in providing communications equipment.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status and sole-source award warrant further review by oversight bodies to ensure the government received the best value and explored all competitive options.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-communications-equipment-manufactu, department-of-transportation, md, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $115.8 million to LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLC. SUMMARIZED LEGACY LINES FROM ACQUIRE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $115.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-10-24. End: 2015-12-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternatives considered?

The data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED' and awarded as a 'sole-source'. A thorough review would be needed to understand the specific justification, such as unique capabilities or lack of market availability. Without this information, it's impossible to definitively assess if alternatives were adequately explored or if this was the only viable option.

What is the current operational status and technological relevance of the 'legacy lines' procured under this contract?

The term 'legacy lines' strongly suggests the equipment is outdated. Its current operational status and relevance are critical for assessing ongoing value and potential risks. If the equipment is nearing end-of-life or unsupported, the FAA may face increased maintenance costs, security vulnerabilities, and operational inefficiencies, necessitating costly replacements.

How does the $115.8M expenditure compare to industry benchmarks for similar communications equipment over the 2009-2015 period?

Direct comparison is challenging due to the sole-source nature and 'legacy' designation. However, benchmark data for comparable, competitively procured communications systems during that timeframe would likely show a significant price difference. The absence of competition prevents a true market-based valuation, making it probable that this contract was less cost-effective than a competed one.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingCommunications Equipment ManufacturingOther Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 9211 CORPORATE BLVD, ROCKVILLE, MD, 20850

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,134,277,334

Exercised Options: $3,134,277,334

Current Obligation: $115,788,213

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-10-24

Current End Date: 2015-12-31

Potential End Date: 2015-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-03-05

More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Services, LLC

View all Lockheed Martin Services, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Transportation Contracts

View all Department of Transportation contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending