DoD's $74.8M Bottled Water Contract Awarded to Composite Analysis Group, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $74,802,130 ($74.8M)

Contractor: Composite Analysis Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-09-02

End Date: 2010-05-25

Contract Duration: 1,726 days

Daily Burn Rate: $43.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Place of Performance

Location: NORCROSS, GWINNETT County, GEORGIA, 30093

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $74.8 million to COMPOSITE ANALYSIS GROUP, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant spending on bottled water highlights potential for cost savings in commodity procurement. 2. The contract's duration and value suggest a substantial, long-term need for this essential resource. 3. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources indicates a complex procurement history. 4. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs, but monitoring is crucial for value. 5. Lack of small business participation warrants further investigation into contracting opportunities.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $74.8 million over five years for bottled water appears high for a commodity. Benchmarking against similar large-scale water procurement contracts is necessary to determine if the pricing is competitive.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The procurement method 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' suggests a non-standard or potentially restrictive initial approach. This could limit price discovery and competition, potentially leading to higher costs.

Taxpayer Impact: The substantial award amount indicates a significant taxpayer investment. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient delivery is paramount to maximizing taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Ensures a consistent supply of a critical resource, particularly for military operations and personnel. The large contract value represents a significant portion of federal spending in this niche manufacturing sector. Potential for cost overruns if not managed effectively, impacting overall defense budget allocation. Raises questions about the necessity and scale of such a large contract for bottled water.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The bottled water manufacturing sector is generally characterized by high volume, low margin production. Federal contracts of this magnitude are significant within this sector, potentially influencing market dynamics and pricing for other large buyers.

Small Business Impact

The absence of small business participation in this contract is notable. Further analysis is needed to understand if opportunities were overlooked or if the contract's scale inherently favors larger entities.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'exclusion of sources' clause in the competition method warrants closer oversight to ensure fairness and prevent potential anti-competitive practices. Regular performance reviews and cost audits are essential.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

bottled-water-manufacturing, department-of-defense, ga, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $74.8 million to COMPOSITE ANALYSIS GROUP, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMPOSITE ANALYSIS GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $74.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-09-02. End: 2010-05-25.

What specific factors led to the exclusion of sources in the initial procurement phase, and how did this impact the final contract price?

The exclusion of sources suggests that certain vendors or methods were deemed unsuitable or unavailable for the initial bidding process. This limitation on the competitive pool could have resulted in less aggressive pricing from the outset. A thorough review of the justification for exclusion and the subsequent bidding process is needed to assess the true impact on taxpayer cost.

Given the high value and long duration, what are the primary risks associated with this contract's execution and cost-effectiveness?

Key risks include potential price escalation beyond initial projections, especially if market conditions for raw materials or distribution change significantly. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, reducing future negotiation leverage. Ensuring strict adherence to the firm fixed price and monitoring delivery quality are critical to mitigate these risks and maintain cost-effectiveness.

How effectively does this contract ensure the reliable and cost-efficient supply of bottled water compared to alternative procurement strategies?

The firm fixed price and long-term nature aim for reliability and predictable costs. However, the limited competition raises questions about optimal cost-efficiency. Alternative strategies, such as consolidating requirements, exploring regional distribution hubs, or leveraging existing commercial supply agreements, might offer better value if competition could be broadened.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingBeverage ManufacturingBottled Water Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Address: 1701 OAKBROOK DR STE D, NORCROSS, GA, 30093

Business Categories: Category Business, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Subchapter S Corporation, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DACW3303D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-09-02

Current End Date: 2010-05-25

Potential End Date: 2010-05-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2020-09-27

More Contracts from Composite Analysis Group, Inc.

View all Composite Analysis Group, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending