Department of Labor's $61.6M Atlanta Job Corps Center Contract Awarded to Management & Training Corporation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $61,578,945 ($61.6M)
Contractor: Management & Training Corporation
Awarding Agency: Department of Labor
Start Date: 2004-10-27
End Date: 2014-07-17
Contract Duration: 3,550 days
Daily Burn Rate: $17.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OPERATION OF THE ATLANTA JOB CORPS CENTER
Place of Performance
Location: ATLANTA, FULTON County, GEORGIA, 30314
State: Georgia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Labor obligated $61.6 million to MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION for work described as: OPERATION OF THE ATLANTA JOB CORPS CENTER Key points: 1. The contract spans nearly a decade, indicating a long-term commitment to the service provider. 2. The absence of small business participation suggests a focus on larger, established entities. 3. The cost-plus incentive fee structure aims to align contractor performance with government objectives. 4. The significant duration and value warrant close monitoring for cost-effectiveness and service quality.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's cost-plus incentive fee structure makes direct pricing comparisons difficult without detailed performance data. The total award value of $61.6M over approximately 10 years suggests a substantial investment in the center's operation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the long duration may have limited subsequent competitive opportunities.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for the operation of the Atlanta Job Corps Center, providing vocational training and employment services.
Public Impact
Provides vocational training and employment services to individuals in the Atlanta area. Supports workforce development initiatives by equipping participants with job skills. The long-term nature of the contract impacts the stability of services for participants.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may reduce flexibility and opportunities for competitive re-evaluation.
- Lack of small business participation could limit diverse approaches and potentially higher costs.
- Cost-plus contracts can incentivize spending if not carefully managed.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition ensures a baseline level of market vetting.
- Incentive fee structure can drive performance improvements.
- Long-term contract provides service continuity for participants.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under the 'Other Technical and Trade Schools' category, which is part of the broader education and workforce development sector. Spending in this area is crucial for addressing skills gaps and promoting economic mobility.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this contract, which is a missed opportunity for fostering competition and potentially leveraging specialized services. Future contracts should explore avenues for small business inclusion.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration is responsible for overseeing this contract. Robust oversight is crucial to ensure the effective use of funds and the quality of services provided under the cost-plus incentive fee structure.
Related Government Programs
- Other Technical and Trade Schools
- Department of Labor Contracting
- Employment and Training Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to complacency.
- Cost-plus contracts can lead to cost overruns if not tightly managed.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Potential for service quality degradation over time without strong oversight.
Tags
other-technical-and-trade-schools, department-of-labor, ga, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Labor awarded $61.6 million to MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION. OPERATION OF THE ATLANTA JOB CORPS CENTER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Labor (Employment and Training Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $61.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-10-27. End: 2014-07-17.
What was the average annual cost per participant, and how does it compare to similar Job Corps centers?
Calculating the average annual cost per participant requires knowing the number of participants served over the contract's life. Without this data, a direct comparison is impossible. However, the total award of $61.6M over roughly 10 years suggests an average annual expenditure of approximately $6.16M. Benchmarking this against similar centers would reveal efficiency and value for money.
What specific performance metrics are tied to the incentive fee, and how has the contractor performed against them?
The effectiveness of the cost-plus incentive fee structure hinges on clearly defined performance metrics related to participant outcomes, such as job placement rates, retention, and wage levels. Without access to the contract's specific incentive clauses and performance reports, it's impossible to assess if the contractor has achieved these targets and if the incentive fee has driven desired results.
How has the long duration of this contract impacted the center's ability to adapt to changing workforce needs and technological advancements?
A nearly decade-long contract, while providing stability, can also create inertia. Adapting to evolving workforce demands and new technologies might be slower compared to shorter, more frequent contract cycles. This could potentially limit the relevance of the training provided if proactive adjustments aren't rigorously managed through contract modifications or performance reviews.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools
Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITY › OPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS INCENTIVE FEE (V)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 500 NORTH MARKETPLACE DR, CENTERVILLE, UT, 84014
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $61,578,945
Exercised Options: $61,578,945
Current Obligation: $61,578,945
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-10-27
Current End Date: 2014-07-17
Potential End Date: 2014-07-17 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-30
More Contracts from Management & Training Corporation
- TAS Code 151060 - Management and Operation of a Government-Owned, Contractor Operated, Correctional Institution in Taft, CA — $448.7M (Department of Justice)
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 7000 LOW Security Male Inmates — $360.8M (Department of Justice)
- Operation of Gary JC Center — $256.4M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of the Gary JCC — $220.1M (Department of Labor)
- Operation of Earle Clements JOB Corps Center — $175.1M (Department of Labor)
View all Management & Training Corporation federal contracts →
Other Department of Labor Contracts
- DOL Enterprise Operations and Maintenance Support Services — $291.2M (Peraton Enterprise Solutions LLC)
- Operation of Gary JC Center — $256.4M (Management & Training Corporation)
- Operation of the Gary JCC — $220.1M (Management & Training Corporation)
- Federal Contract — $178.1M (Career Systems Development Corporation)
- Operation of Earle Clements JOB Corps Center — $175.1M (Management & Training Corporation)