YouthBuild Global Inc. contract for technical assistance awarded $22M over 6 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,062,250 ($22.1M)

Contractor: Youthbuild Global, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Labor

Start Date: 2015-12-31

End Date: 2021-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,008 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF YOUTH BUILD 2015 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: SOMERVILLE, MIDDLESEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02144

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Labor obligated $22.1 million to YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF YOUTH BUILD 2015 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value of $22.1M over its lifecycle suggests a significant investment in program support. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified vendors. 3. Performance period spanning over six years allows for sustained program development and impact. 4. The 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' NAICS code points to a focus on operational and strategic support. 5. The contract's duration and value may indicate a need for specialized expertise in youth development program management. 6. The absence of small business set-aside suggests the primary focus was on best value regardless of business size.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The total award of $22.1 million over approximately six years averages to about $3.7 million per year. Benchmarking this against similar technical assistance contracts for large federal programs is challenging without more specific data on the scope of services. However, the duration and scale suggest a substantial need for administrative and management consulting. The contract type (Time and Materials) can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored, which warrants a 'fair' assessment of value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' implying that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but this method generally fosters price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for achieving competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition as it typically drives down costs and ensures the government receives the best possible value for its investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely participants in the YouthBuild program, who receive enhanced support and services through the technical assistance provided. The contract delivers administrative management and general management consulting services to support the operational effectiveness of the YouthBuild initiative. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, supporting YouthBuild programs across various locations in the United States. Workforce implications include the potential for job creation within YouthBuild Global, Inc. and indirectly within the programs they support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The Time and Materials contract type carries inherent risk of cost escalation if not managed diligently.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the technical assistance.
The significant contract value necessitates robust oversight to ensure funds are used efficiently and effectively.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process.
The long performance period (over 6 years) indicates a sustained commitment and potential for long-term program impact.
The contract supports a program (YouthBuild) aimed at positive social outcomes for young people.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. The market for these services is vast, with numerous firms capable of providing administrative and management support. Federal spending in this category often supports program implementation, policy analysis, and operational efficiency across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend heavily on the specific nature and scale of the technical assistance required for the YouthBuild program.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the competition was open to businesses of all sizes, and the award was made based on the best overall value proposition. While there's no explicit subcontracting requirement mentioned, large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to engage small businesses in their supply chain, which could indirectly benefit the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for this contract would typically involve the Department of Labor's contracting officers and program managers responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving payments. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are tied to the contractor's performance against stated objectives and deliverables. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Labor Youth Programs
Job Corps
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Programs
Federal Grants Management Support
Technical Assistance Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data hinders effectiveness assessment.
Need for robust oversight to ensure efficient use of significant funds.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Labor awarded $22.1 million to YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF YOUTH BUILD 2015 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is YOUTHBUILD GLOBAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Labor (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2015-12-31. End: 2021-06-30.

What specific technical assistance services were provided under this contract?

The contract falls under NAICS code 541611 (Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services). This typically includes services such as strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, program management support, and general administrative consulting. For the YouthBuild program, this likely translated into support for program operations, grant management, participant tracking, reporting, and potentially guidance on best practices for youth development and workforce training initiatives. The specific deliverables would be detailed in the contract's Statement of Work (SOW), which is not provided here but would outline the exact tasks, expected outcomes, and reporting requirements for YouthBuild Global, Inc.

How does the $22.1 million award compare to similar technical assistance contracts for youth development programs?

Direct comparison is difficult without knowing the precise scope and duration of services for other youth development technical assistance contracts. However, $22.1 million over six years represents an average annual value of approximately $3.7 million. This figure suggests a substantial and ongoing need for support for the YouthBuild program. Larger, more complex federal initiatives often receive significant funding for technical assistance to ensure effective implementation and reach. The value indicates a significant federal investment in ensuring the success and efficiency of the YouthBuild program through expert support.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the success of YouthBuild Global, Inc.'s technical assistance?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, KPIs for technical assistance contracts focus on the effectiveness and efficiency of the support provided. For YouthBuild, these might include metrics related to improved program outcomes for participants (e.g., job placement rates, educational attainment), enhanced operational efficiency of local YouthBuild grantees, successful implementation of program initiatives, timely and accurate reporting, and satisfaction levels of program staff receiving the assistance. These KPIs would be formally defined in the contract's SOW and performance work statement.

What is the track record of YouthBuild Global, Inc. in managing federal contracts of this size and scope?

Information on the specific track record of 'YouthBuild Global, Inc.' in managing federal contracts of this size is not detailed in the provided data. However, the fact that they were awarded a $22.1 million contract through full and open competition suggests they met the government's requirements and demonstrated capability. Further investigation into their past performance ratings, previous federal awards, and any documented issues or successes would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their track record. The duration of this contract (over 6 years) also implies a level of trust and satisfactory performance over time.

What risks are associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract of this magnitude?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like this one, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. Since payment is based on the direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and the cost of materials, there is a potential for costs to escalate beyond initial estimates if the scope of work is not well-defined or if efficiencies are not maintained. For a contract of $22.1 million, robust oversight is crucial to monitor labor hours, ensure reasonable material costs, and prevent scope creep. The government must actively manage the contractor's effort to mitigate the risk of overspending and ensure value for money.

How has federal spending on YouthBuild programs evolved over time?

The provided data focuses on a single contract awarded in 2015. To understand the evolution of federal spending on YouthBuild programs, one would need to analyze historical budget allocations and contract awards specifically for the YouthBuild initiative across different fiscal years. This would involve examining appropriations for the program, the number and value of grants and contracts awarded annually, and trends in participation and outcomes. Such an analysis would reveal whether funding has increased, decreased, or remained stable, and how it correlates with program performance and policy priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: DOL-ETA-15-R-00093

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 58 DAY ST STE 300, SOMERVILLE, MA, 02144

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $23,276,468

Exercised Options: $23,276,468

Current Obligation: $22,062,250

Actual Outlays: $7,216,865

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline