DOJ's $22.3M IGF Asset Forfeiture Program Support contract awarded to Deloitte Consulting LLP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,298,000 ($22.3M)

Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2013-09-30

End Date: 2014-09-30

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $61.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ASSET FORFEITURE PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR FBI

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20530, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $22.3 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ASSET FORFEITURE PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR FBI Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. The contract duration was 365 days. 3. Awarded under the Offices, Boards and Divisions for the Department of Justice. 4. The contract was awarded on September 30, 2013, and ended on September 30, 2014. 5. The contract type was labor hours. 6. The base contract value was $6.1M, with a potential value of $22.3M.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's base value was $6.1M, with a potential to reach $22.3M, indicating a significant scope for services. Benchmarking this against similar administrative management consulting contracts for federal agencies is challenging without more granular data on the specific services provided. However, the wide range between base and potential value suggests flexibility in service delivery or scope adjustments during the contract period. The per-unit cost is not readily available for a direct comparison.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 3 bidders indicates a moderate level of competition for this service. A competitive bidding process generally helps in achieving fair market prices and ensuring that the government receives the best value for its investment.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down costs through market forces, ensuring that federal funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from enhanced administrative and management support for its asset forfeiture program. Services delivered likely improved the efficiency and effectiveness of the IGF program. The contract's impact is primarily within the federal government's administrative functions. Workforce implications are related to the consulting services provided by Deloitte.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep given the large difference between base and potential contract value.
Limited transparency on specific performance metrics and outcomes achieved.
The contract's single-year duration might indicate a need for ongoing services or a pilot program.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a fair process.
Multiple bidders participated, suggesting market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
The contract supported a critical function within the Department of Justice.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant part of federal spending, with agencies frequently procuring expertise to manage complex programs and operations. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve looking at other large-scale consulting contracts awarded to support federal law enforcement or administrative functions.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract involved small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. The award to a large firm like Deloitte suggests it was likely competed on a scale that favored larger prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if any small business participation occurred through subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms would typically involve contract performance reviews by the Department of Justice contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are tied to the delivery of services as outlined in the contract statement of work. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible.

Related Government Programs

FBI Asset Forfeiture Program
Department of Justice Administrative Support Contracts
Federal Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for significant scope expansion from base to potential value.
Limited public information on specific performance outcomes.
Single-year duration may not align with long-term program needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $22.3 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. IGF::OT::IGF ASSET FORFEITURE PROGRAM SUPPORT FOR FBI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-30. End: 2014-09-30.

What specific services did Deloitte Consulting LLP provide under this contract?

The contract, NAICS code 541611, specifies 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' While the exact deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such services typically encompass areas like strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, program management support, and policy development. For the IGF Asset Forfeiture Program, this could have involved optimizing operational workflows, enhancing data management, advising on compliance, or supporting the strategic direction of forfeiture activities within the FBI and DOJ.

How does the potential contract value of $22.3M compare to the base value of $6.1M?

The significant difference between the base value ($6.1M) and the potential value ($22.3M) suggests that the contract allowed for substantial growth or flexibility in the scope of services. This could be due to options for additional work, task orders for evolving needs, or performance incentives. Such a wide variance warrants scrutiny to understand the drivers of this potential increase and ensure it aligns with actual program requirements and provides good value for taxpayer money. It might indicate a need for more detailed planning or a phased approach to service delivery.

What is the track record of Deloitte Consulting LLP with the Department of Justice?

Deloitte Consulting LLP is a major federal contractor with a long history of serving various government agencies, including the Department of Justice. They have been awarded numerous contracts across a wide range of services, from IT modernization to management consulting and financial services. Their extensive experience suggests a strong understanding of federal procurement processes and agency needs. However, as with any large contractor, specific contract performance and any associated issues would need to be reviewed on a contract-by-contract basis.

What does the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' category entail for federal agencies?

This category, defined by NAICS code 541611, covers establishments primarily engaged in providing operating advice and assistance on matters of management to other firms from a wide range of management disciplines. This includes the expertise in areas such as administrative management, human resources, marketing, operations, and strategic planning. For federal agencies, these services are crucial for improving efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability in program execution, policy implementation, and overall organizational performance.

How does the contract's duration of 365 days impact its assessment?

A 365-day duration for a contract with a potential value of $22.3M suggests a focused, potentially project-based engagement rather than a long-term, ongoing support requirement. This timeframe might be suitable for specific initiatives, assessments, or the implementation of particular solutions. However, if the underlying need for these consulting services is continuous, a single-year contract could lead to frequent re-procurement efforts, potentially increasing administrative costs and disrupting service continuity. It raises questions about whether this was a pilot program or if follow-on contracts were anticipated.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Deloitte LLP (UEI: 014127109)

Address: 1725 DUKE ST, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,298,000

Exercised Options: $22,298,000

Current Obligation: $22,298,000

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ08C1657

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline