DOJ awards $46.5M for Enterprise Directory Design Support to General Dynamics IT

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,551,429 ($46.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2007-10-01

End Date: 2013-01-18

Contract Duration: 1,936 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: ENTERPRISE-WIDE DIRECTORY DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT FOR JMD/ESS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20530

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $46.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: ENTERPRISE-WIDE DIRECTORY DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT FOR JMD/ESS Key points: 1. Contract awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. for enterprise-wide directory design implementation. 2. The contract value is $46,551,429.20. 3. This is a competitive delivery order under a larger contract. 4. The period of performance spans from October 1, 2007, to January 18, 2013.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract was awarded as a Time and Materials (T&M) type, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The total award value of $46.5M over approximately 5 years suggests a moderate annual spend.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

This was a competitive delivery order, indicating that multiple vendors likely had the opportunity to bid. The competitive nature should have driven a reasonable price, but T&M contracts require diligent oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers are impacted by the $46.5M expenditure for IT support services. The effectiveness of this spending depends on the successful implementation of the directory design and its long-term value to the Department of Justice.

Public Impact

Enhances the Department of Justice's internal IT infrastructure and data management capabilities. Supports the operational efficiency of various offices and divisions within the DOJ. Potential for improved user access and security through a well-designed directory system. Long-term implications for IT modernization and data governance within the agency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost uncertainty.
Long performance period (over 5 years) increases risk of scope creep or obsolescence.
No specific small business participation noted.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process.
Supports critical IT infrastructure for a major federal agency.
Clear definition of services for directory design implementation.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector, particularly system design and integration, is a significant area of federal spending. Benchmarks for similar contracts vary widely based on scope, complexity, and duration, but $46.5M over 5 years for enterprise-wide directory support is substantial.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). There is no indication of small business subcontracting goals or participation in this specific delivery order.

Oversight & Accountability

As a competitive delivery order, there should be established oversight mechanisms within the Department of Justice to monitor performance and costs. The Time and Materials nature necessitates close scrutiny to ensure value for money and prevent overspending.

Related Government Programs

Computer Systems Design Services
Department of Justice Contracting
Offices, Boards and Divisions Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract.
Long contract duration increases risk of scope creep and potential obsolescence.
Lack of explicit small business participation noted.
Effectiveness dependent on successful implementation and long-term utility.
Requires diligent government oversight to ensure value for money.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $46.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. ENTERPRISE-WIDE DIRECTORY DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT FOR JMD/ESS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-10-01. End: 2013-01-18.

What was the specific scope of the 'Enterprise-Wide Directory Design Implementation Support' and how did it align with the DOJ's strategic IT goals?

The scope likely involved the planning, design, and initial implementation phases of a centralized directory service for the Department of Justice. This would typically encompass user authentication, access control, and resource management across various DOJ components. Alignment with strategic goals would depend on whether the DOJ prioritized data consolidation, enhanced security, or improved IT service delivery through such a system.

Given the Time and Materials contract type, what measures were in place to control costs and ensure the $46.5M award did not exceed its value?

Effective cost control for T&M contracts relies heavily on robust government oversight, including detailed monitoring of labor hours, rates, and material costs. Establishing clear ceilings, requiring detailed justifications for expenditures, and conducting regular performance reviews are crucial. The DOJ would need to ensure that the contractor's efforts were efficient and directly contributed to the defined project milestones to maximize value.

How did the competitive delivery order process ensure fair pricing and vendor performance for this significant IT support contract?

A competitive delivery order process allows multiple qualified vendors to propose solutions and pricing, fostering competition that typically drives down costs and improves service quality. The DOJ would have evaluated proposals based on technical merit, past performance, and price. Fair pricing is achieved through this competitive bidding, while vendor performance is managed through contract terms, service level agreements, and ongoing monitoring throughout the contract's duration.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Sterling Parent Inc. (UEI: 968838909)

Address: 4300 FAIR LAKES CT, FAIRFAX, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,551,429

Exercised Options: $46,551,429

Current Obligation: $46,551,429

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ05C1118

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline