DOJ's $22.3M Deloitte contract for management consulting services awarded under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,282,500 ($22.3M)

Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2013-11-13

End Date: 2014-09-30

Contract Duration: 321 days

Daily Burn Rate: $69.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 22314, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $22.3 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a large, established firm, indicating a focus on experience and capability. 2. The fixed-price contract type suggests a defined scope and predictable costs for the government. 3. Awarded by the Department of Justice, specifically the FBI, highlighting a need for specialized administrative support. 4. The contract duration of 321 days points to a project-based engagement rather than long-term support. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 indicates a focus on general management consulting. 6. The contract was awarded in November 2013, with an end date in September 2014, suggesting a completed project.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $22.3 million for approximately one year of administrative management and general management consulting services appears to be within a reasonable range for a large federal agency like the FBI. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services awarded to large firms by agencies of similar size and scope would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. However, without specific details on the deliverables and the complexity of the services provided, it is difficult to definitively assess the value for money. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates one award, but the competition process itself suggests that multiple proposals were likely received and evaluated. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensures that the government has access to a range of qualified contractors.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to more competitive pricing, which is beneficial for taxpayers by ensuring that government funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which received administrative management and general management consulting services. These services likely aimed to improve the operational efficiency and management practices within the FBI. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, where the FBI operates. The contract supported the professional workforce within the consulting firm, Deloitte Consulting LLP, and potentially internal FBI staff involved in the project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true impact and success of the consulting services.
The broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' can sometimes lead to scope creep if not tightly managed.
Reliance on a single large contractor for critical consulting needs could pose a risk if the contractor's performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty and incentivizes efficient delivery.
The contractor, Deloitte Consulting LLP, is a well-established firm with a track record in government contracting.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, with agencies frequently engaging consultants to address complex operational, strategic, and administrative challenges. The market for these services is competitive, featuring a mix of large, established firms and smaller specialized companies. Federal spending in this area often benchmarks against private sector rates, adjusted for government-specific requirements and procurement processes.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a large contract awarded to a major consulting firm, it is unlikely that significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses were mandated or a primary focus, unless specified within the contract's statement of work. This suggests that the primary benefits of this contract were realized by the prime contractor, with limited direct impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the contracting officers and program managers within the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. As a completed contract, final reviews and close-out procedures would have been followed. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS, which provide basic information on contract value, type, and parties involved. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Commercialization
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Federal Bureau of Investigation Operations Support
Department of Justice Administrative Services

Risk Flags

Contract awarded to a single large vendor.
Limited information on specific performance metrics.
Scope of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' can be broad.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $22.3 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. IGF::CT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-11-13. End: 2014-09-30.

What specific management consulting services were delivered under this contract?

The contract's NAICS code (541611) indicates 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services.' While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such services typically encompass areas like organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, operational efficiency assessments, and policy development support. Given the award to the FBI, these services likely focused on enhancing the bureau's internal administrative functions, improving resource allocation, streamlining workflows, or supporting specific management initiatives aimed at increasing effectiveness and efficiency in law enforcement support operations.

How does the $22.3 million contract value compare to similar FBI or DOJ consulting contracts?

Without access to a comprehensive database of historical FBI and DOJ consulting contracts with detailed scopes of work, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $22.3 million for approximately 10 months of comprehensive management consulting services for a major federal law enforcement agency is within the expected range for large-scale engagements. Contracts of this nature often involve significant analytical work, strategic recommendations, and implementation support. The value reflects the complexity of the agency's operations and the expertise required from a contractor like Deloitte. Further analysis would require benchmarking against contracts with similar NAICS codes, contract durations, and agency sizes.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?

The provided data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, for management consulting contracts, KPIs might include improvements in process efficiency (e.g., reduced cycle times), cost savings achieved, successful implementation of recommended strategies, enhanced organizational clarity, or improved stakeholder satisfaction. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to quantitatively assess the contract's performance and the value derived by the FBI. A thorough review of the contract's statement of work and performance reports would be necessary to identify these metrics.

What is Deloitte Consulting LLP's track record with the Department of Justice and FBI?

Deloitte Consulting LLP is a major federal contractor with a significant history of providing a wide range of services to various government agencies, including the Department of Justice (DOJ) and its components like the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Their track record generally includes large-scale IT modernization, management consulting, financial management, and cybersecurity services. While this specific contract was awarded in 2013, Deloitte has continued to secure numerous contracts with the DOJ and FBI in subsequent years, indicating a sustained relationship and perceived capability by these agencies. Their extensive experience in the public sector suggests a familiarity with government procurement processes and operational requirements.

Were there any identified risks or challenges during the performance of this contract?

The provided summary data does not explicitly detail any risks or challenges encountered during the performance of this specific contract. However, general risks associated with large management consulting engagements for federal agencies can include scope creep, difficulties in integrating recommendations into existing bureaucratic structures, resistance to change from internal staff, and challenges in accurately measuring the impact of consulting interventions. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract implies that the contractor bore the primary financial risk associated with cost overruns, provided the scope remained unchanged. Any significant deviations or issues would typically be documented in contract performance reports or modification records.

How does the $22.3M award compare to the total federal spending on management consulting services?

The $22.3 million awarded for this specific contract represents a fraction of the total federal spending on management consulting services, which typically amounts to billions of dollars annually across all agencies. Federal agencies frequently utilize management consultants to address complex issues, improve efficiency, and implement new strategies. While this contract is substantial for a single engagement, it is one of many within the broader federal consulting landscape. The FBI's need for such services underscores the ongoing demand within government for specialized expertise to navigate administrative and operational challenges, contributing to the overall significant federal expenditure in this category.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Deloitte LLP (UEI: 014127109)

Address: 1725 DUKE ST, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,282,500

Exercised Options: $22,282,500

Current Obligation: $22,282,500

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJJ08C1657

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline