DOJ's DEA Spends $13.6M on Computer Systems Design Services with Primus Solutions, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $13,655,067 ($13.7M)

Contractor: Primus Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2009-01-01

End Date: 2010-12-31

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: 09D, EXCERCISE OF OPTION PERIOD I.

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22152

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $13.7 million to PRIMUS SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: 09D, EXCERCISE OF OPTION PERIOD I. Key points: 1. The contract for computer systems design services was awarded to Primus Solutions, LLC. 2. The total value of the contract is $13.6 million. 3. This contract was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. The sector is Information Technology (IT) services. 5. The contract duration is approximately two years.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $13.6 million for two years of computer systems design services appears high without competitive benchmarking. The lack of competition makes it difficult to assess if the pricing is fair and reasonable compared to market rates for similar services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This method limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely led to a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive bidding process, impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding. The DEA's reliance on a single vendor for critical IT services could pose a risk. Lack of transparency in the procurement process hinders public scrutiny of spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is highly competitive, with numerous vendors offering computer systems design. A $13.6 million contract over two years for these services, especially when not competed, warrants scrutiny against industry benchmarks.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether Primus Solutions, LLC is a small business. The lack of competition suggests that small businesses may not have had an opportunity to bid on this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The non-competitive nature of this award raises questions about the oversight of the procurement process and whether all available options were explored to ensure the best value for the government.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

computer-systems-design-services, department-of-justice, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $13.7 million to PRIMUS SOLUTIONS, LLC. 09D, EXCERCISE OF OPTION PERIOD I.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRIMUS SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $13.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-01-01. End: 2010-12-31.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?

The justification for not competing the contract is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source awards require a detailed justification, such as a critical need or lack of qualified sources. Without this, it's impossible to assess the price determination process and ensure it aligns with fair market value.

What are the risks associated with awarding a $13.6 million contract without competition for IT services?

The primary risks include potential overpayment due to the absence of competitive pressure, vendor lock-in, and reduced innovation. The government may not be receiving the best possible solution or price, and the DEA could become overly reliant on Primus Solutions, limiting future flexibility.

How effective is this contract in meeting the DEA's computer systems design needs compared to a competitive procurement?

The effectiveness cannot be fully assessed without knowing the specific requirements and the vendor's performance. However, a competitive procurement process generally leads to better outcomes by fostering innovation and ensuring the government selects the most capable and cost-effective solution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (UEI: 076637073)

Address: 6303 IVY LANE STE 130, GREENBELT, MD, 04

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,655,067

Exercised Options: $13,655,067

Current Obligation: $13,655,067

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJDEA08C0017

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-01-01

Current End Date: 2010-12-31

Potential End Date: 2010-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-03-13

More Contracts from Primus Solutions, LLC

View all Primus Solutions, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending