DOE awards $28M for enriched uranium recovery, raising questions on competition and value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,000,846 ($28.0M)

Contractor: Bwxt Nuclear Operations Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 2011-09-29

End Date: 2019-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,831 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ENRICHED URANIUM RECOVERY SERVICES FOR Y-12 SITE OFFICE - YSO.

Place of Performance

Location: LYNCHBURG, LYNCHBURG CITY County, VIRGINIA, 24502

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $28.0 million to BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC. for work described as: ENRICHED URANIUM RECOVERY SERVICES FOR Y-12 SITE OFFICE - YSO. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty but may not incentivize efficiency. 3. Long contract duration of over 7 years suggests a need for stable, long-term services. 4. The contractor, BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc., has a significant presence in the nuclear sector. 5. Lack of competition is a key risk indicator for potential overpayment. 6. The contract falls under 'All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing,' a broad category.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specialized service. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the $28 million awarded represents a fair market price. The firm-fixed-price contract type offers predictability but doesn't inherently guarantee cost-effectiveness compared to other pricing models. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of work and unit costs to similar, competitively procured services, if available.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed among multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when only one vendor possesses the necessary specialized capabilities or when urgent circumstances preclude a competitive process. The absence of competition means that BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. was the only entity considered, which can limit opportunities for price negotiation and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be at a disadvantage as the lack of competition prevents the government from leveraging market forces to secure the best possible price. This can lead to higher overall costs for the services rendered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of Energy, which receives essential enriched uranium recovery services for the Y-12 Site Office. The services delivered are critical for nuclear materials management and site remediation. The geographic impact is localized to the Y-12 National Nuclear Security Complex in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The contract supports specialized jobs within the nuclear industry, particularly in chemical manufacturing and nuclear operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the 'All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing' sector, a broad category that includes specialized processes like enriched uranium recovery. The nuclear services market is highly specialized, with a limited number of qualified contractors. Spending in this niche is often driven by government requirements related to national defense and energy production. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of enriched uranium recovery and the limited number of players.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. Furthermore, the 'ss': false indicates it is not a small business prime award. Consequently, the primary contract is awarded to a large business. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans or their impact on the small business ecosystem. However, large sole-source contracts often have limited subcontracting opportunities for small businesses unless specifically mandated.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Energy's contracting and program management offices. Given the nature of the services, specific oversight related to nuclear safety and material handling would be paramount. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source award, making public scrutiny of the procurement process challenging. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-energy, enriched-uranium-recovery, y-12-site-office, bwxt-nuclear-operations-group, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, chemical-manufacturing, nuclear-services, virginia, definitive-contract, national-security

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $28.0 million to BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC.. ENRICHED URANIUM RECOVERY SERVICES FOR Y-12 SITE OFFICE - YSO.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BWXT NUCLEAR OPERATIONS GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-09-29. End: 2019-06-30.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data does not include the specific justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are justified when only one responsible source is available to meet the government's needs, often due to unique capabilities, specialized knowledge, or urgent requirements. For enriched uranium recovery services at a site like Y-12, the justification likely centers on BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc.'s unique expertise, existing infrastructure, and security clearances required for handling such sensitive materials. A formal Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) would normally be required and publicly accessible, detailing these reasons.

How does the firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type impact cost control for enriched uranium recovery?

A Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract establishes a ceiling price that the contractor must not exceed, regardless of the actual costs incurred. This provides the government with cost certainty and shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. For enriched uranium recovery, where material costs and processing complexities can vary, an FFP contract incentivizes the contractor to manage its own costs efficiently to maximize profit. However, it can also lead to higher initial pricing as the contractor may build in a contingency for unforeseen expenses. The effectiveness of FFP in this context depends on the contractor's ability to accurately estimate costs and the government's ability to define the scope of work precisely.

What is BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Energy and similar contracts?

BWXT Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. (BWXT) is a major player in the nuclear industry and has a long-standing relationship with the Department of Energy (DOE). They are known for their work in nuclear fuel production, component manufacturing, and services for government facilities, including the Y-12 National Nuclear Security Complex. Their extensive experience in handling nuclear materials and operating within secure government sites suggests a strong technical capability and a history of performance. However, specific details on past performance metrics, any disputes, or prior contract issues would require a deeper dive into contract databases and performance reports.

Are there any comparable contracts for enriched uranium recovery services that could serve as a benchmark?

Finding direct, publicly available comparable contracts for enriched uranium recovery services is challenging due to the highly specialized nature of the work and the limited number of entities capable of performing it. Most such services are likely procured through sole-source or limited-competition contracts by agencies like the DOE or the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA). Benchmarking would likely involve comparing unit costs for specific recovery processes, waste treatment, or material handling against internal DOE cost estimates, historical data from similar sites, or data from international nuclear agencies, rather than standard commercial market rates.

What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration contract (over 7 years) for these services?

A long-duration contract, such as this one spanning over seven years (from Sep 2011 to Jun 2019), carries several potential risks. Firstly, the technology and best practices in enriched uranium recovery could evolve significantly over this period, potentially making the contracted services or methods outdated. Secondly, the fixed pricing, while offering certainty, might not reflect future market fluctuations or efficiencies gained through technological advancements. Thirdly, a long-term commitment can create vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers if performance issues arise or better alternatives become available. Lastly, the government's needs or priorities might shift over such a long timeframe, requiring costly contract modifications.

How does the 'All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing' classification impact the understanding of this contract's scope?

The classification 'All Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing' (NAICS code 325188) is very broad and encompasses a wide range of chemical production processes that don't fit into more specific categories. For enriched uranium recovery, this classification highlights the chemical processing aspect of the service. However, it doesn't fully capture the nuclear-specific complexities, security requirements, and regulatory oversight involved. This broad classification can make it difficult to compare spending or performance with more narrowly defined chemical manufacturing contracts, as it groups together diverse industrial activities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingBasic Chemical ManufacturingAll Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: BWX Technologies, Inc. (UEI: 968037221)

Address: 2016 MOUNT ATHOS RD, LYNCHBURG, VA, 24504

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,638,566

Exercised Options: $28,000,846

Current Obligation: $28,000,846

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-09-29

Current End Date: 2019-06-30

Potential End Date: 2019-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-03-12

More Contracts from Bwxt Nuclear Operations Group, Inc.

View all Bwxt Nuclear Operations Group, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending