Department of Energy awards $26.6M for Engineering Support Services to CAS-Navarro Joint Venture
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,629,740 ($26.6M)
Contractor: Cas-Navarro Joint Venture, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2010-11-19
End Date: 2015-11-30
Contract Duration: 1,837 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 17
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: TAS::89 0321::TAS TO PROVIDE INCREMENTAL FUNDING FOR THE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES.
Place of Performance
Location: LAKEWOOD, JEFFERSON County, COLORADO, 80401
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $26.6 million to CAS-NAVARRO JOINT VENTURE, LLC for work described as: TAS::89 0321::TAS TO PROVIDE INCREMENTAL FUNDING FOR THE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES. Key points: 1. The contract is for advisory and assistance engineering, scientific, and technical support. 2. CAS-Navarro Joint Venture is the awardee for this time and materials contract. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. This award represents a significant investment in engineering services for the Department of Energy.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $26.6 million over five years appears reasonable for specialized engineering support. However, without specific task details or performance metrics, a precise value assessment is difficult. Benchmarking against similar long-term A&A contracts would provide better context.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and ensures fair market value. The exclusion of sources, if justified, should be clearly documented.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure services at the best possible price. The total value of $26.6 million will be spent on essential engineering support.
Public Impact
Supports critical engineering and technical functions within the Department of Energy. The contract duration of five years suggests a need for sustained support. Awarded through a competitive process, aiming for cost-effectiveness. Potential for follow-on work or expansion based on performance.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics for value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns with Time and Materials contract type.
- Justification for 'exclusion of sources' needs review.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Long-term contract indicates sustained need and potential stability.
- Supports critical government functions.
Sector Analysis
The Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330) is crucial for government operations, providing specialized expertise. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on agency needs, project complexity, and economic conditions. This $26.6M award is a moderate-sized contract for this type of service.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate if small businesses were involved as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be crucial to ensure the effective delivery of engineering services and manage costs under the Time and Materials contract. The Department of Energy's contracting office is responsible for monitoring performance and compliance.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Time and Materials contract type increases cost risk.
- Potential for scope creep without clear task definitions.
- Need for strong government oversight to ensure performance and cost control.
- Justification for 'exclusion of sources' requires scrutiny.
- Limited visibility into specific deliverables and performance metrics.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-energy, co, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $26.6 million to CAS-NAVARRO JOINT VENTURE, LLC. TAS::89 0321::TAS TO PROVIDE INCREMENTAL FUNDING FOR THE ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE ENGINEERING, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CAS-NAVARRO JOINT VENTURE, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-11-19. End: 2015-11-30.
What specific engineering, scientific, and technical support tasks are included under this contract, and how do they align with the Department of Energy's strategic objectives?
The contract provides 'Advisory and Assistance Engineering, Scientific and Technical Support Services.' While the specific tasks are not detailed here, they likely encompass a range of support functions critical to DOE's mission, such as research support, technical analysis, program management assistance, and safety engineering. Alignment with strategic objectives would depend on the specific projects and initiatives these services support, requiring a deeper dive into task orders.
Given the Time and Materials contract type, what measures are in place to control costs and prevent potential overruns for this $26.6 million award?
Time and Materials (T&M) contracts carry inherent risks of cost overruns. Effective cost control relies on robust oversight, including detailed monitoring of labor hours and rates, strict adherence to ceilings, and clear definition of work scope. The Department of Energy should have established procedures for reviewing and approving T&M expenditures, potentially including independent government cost estimates and regular performance reviews to ensure value for money.
How does the 'exclusion of sources' clause in the full and open competition impact the potential for innovation and cost savings compared to a completely unrestricted competition?
Excluding sources, even within a full and open framework, can limit the pool of potential bidders and potentially reduce competitive pressure. If the exclusion is based on specific, justifiable criteria (e.g., unique capabilities, security requirements), it might be necessary. However, it could inadvertently exclude innovative solutions or more cost-effective providers. The justification for such exclusions should be transparent and rigorously assessed to ensure it serves the government's best interest.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 17
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12110 PECOS ST STE 210, WESTMINSTER, CO, 80234
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,936,263
Exercised Options: $26,936,263
Current Obligation: $26,629,740
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DEEE0002282
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-11-19
Current End Date: 2015-11-30
Potential End Date: 2015-11-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-06-07
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)