DOE awards $26M non-competitive order to Leidos for West Valley environmental services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,048,953 ($26.0M)
Contractor: Leidos, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2005-02-18
End Date: 2010-07-16
Contract Duration: 1,974 days
Daily Burn Rate: $13.2K/day
Competition Type: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: INTEGRATIONAND EXECUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR THE WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Place of Performance
Location: WEST VALLEY, CATTARAUGUS County, NEW YORK, 14171
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $26.0 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: INTEGRATIONAND EXECUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR THE WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT Key points: 1. Leidos secured a significant $26M contract for environmental impact and decommissioning planning. 2. The award was non-competitive, raising questions about price discovery and market alternatives. 3. This contract addresses critical environmental remediation needs at the West Valley Demonstration Project. 4. The duration of the contract (1974 days) suggests a complex, long-term project.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $26M for environmental consulting services is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to market rates for similar complex environmental planning and decommissioning projects.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This was a non-competitive delivery order, meaning Leidos was selected without a bidding process. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers as market competition was bypassed.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in the government paying more than necessary for these specialized environmental services.
Public Impact
Environmental cleanup and decommissioning are crucial for public safety and ecological health. The West Valley site has a history of nuclear waste management challenges. Transparency in contracting for such sensitive projects is vital for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Non-competitive award
- Lack of price competition
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Addresses critical environmental needs
- Experienced contractor (Leidos)
Sector Analysis
Environmental consulting services, particularly those involving nuclear decommissioning, are highly specialized and often involve complex regulatory frameworks. Spending in this niche can vary significantly based on project scope and site-specific challenges.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific contract award, as it was a non-competitive delivery order to a large prime contractor.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Energy's oversight is critical for ensuring the effective and responsible execution of this environmental plan, especially given the non-competitive nature of the award.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Consulting Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for overpayment due to non-competitive award
- Risk of inadequate price discovery
- Dependency on a single contractor's capabilities
- Long-term environmental remediation complexities
Tags
environmental-consulting-services, department-of-energy, ny, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $26.0 million to LEIDOS, INC.. INTEGRATIONAND EXECUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND DECOMMISSIONING PLAN FOR THE WEST VALLEY DEMONSTRATION PROJECT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-02-18. End: 2010-07-16.
What specific factors justified the non-competitive award to Leidos for this environmental planning and decommissioning work?
The justification for a non-competitive award typically stems from unique capabilities, urgent needs, or situations where only one source can fulfill the requirement. For complex projects like nuclear site decommissioning, specialized expertise and prior involvement might be cited. However, without detailed documentation, it's difficult to ascertain the precise rationale and whether alternatives were thoroughly explored.
How will the Department of Energy ensure cost-effectiveness and value for money given the absence of a competitive bidding process?
The agency can implement robust oversight mechanisms, including detailed cost analysis, performance monitoring, and milestone-based payments. Regular reviews of contractor performance against established benchmarks and independent cost estimations can help mitigate risks associated with sole-source contracts. Strong contract management is essential to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.
What are the long-term environmental risks if the decommissioning plan and execution are not managed effectively under this contract?
Ineffective management could lead to prolonged environmental contamination, posing risks to groundwater, soil, and local ecosystems. Delayed cleanup increases the potential for radioactive material spread and worker exposure. Furthermore, inadequate planning could result in cost overruns and extended project timelines, increasing the overall financial burden and delaying the site's safe closure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Environmental Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&D › SPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NON-COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: DERQ24OH30299
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc. (UEI: 611641312)
Address: 1710 SAIC DRIVE, ROOM #8031, MCLEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,048,953
Exercised Options: $26,048,953
Current Obligation: $26,048,953
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS10F0076J
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-02-18
Current End Date: 2010-07-16
Potential End Date: 2010-07-16 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2014-01-09
More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.
- Science Operation and Maintenance Support for the United States Antarctic Program — $3.1B (National Science Foundation)
- Provide Funding for Clin 302 for Pre-Flight and In-Flight Services. Contract Number Dtfawa-05-C-00031, Lockheed Martin. POP 01/16/08-03/31/08 — $1.9B (Department of Transportation)
- THE Facilities Development and Operations Contract(fdoc) Specifies Technical, Managerial, and Adminstrative Work Needed to Ensure the Availablitity, Integrity, and Reliability of Missionoperations Facilites Supporting National Aeronautics and Space Administration (nasa) Human Space Flight (HSF) Programs Requiring Mission Operations Support. the Objective of This Contract IS to Consolidate Efforts Across the Facilities Covered Under Fodoc in Order to Maximize Synergy for Hardware and Software Development, Modification, Sustaining. Maintenance, Reconfiguration, and Operations for the Purpose of Reducing Cost Without Compromising Facility Functionality and Performance. Nasa Will Collaborate With the Contractor on Developing Procedural and Technical Innovations That Improve Quality, Ensure Customer Satisfaction and Reduce Cost. Mission Operations Facilities Currently Support the Space Shuttle Programand the International Space Station Progra, Including International Partner and Commmercial Visiting Vehicles. Mission Operations Facilities Supporting the Cnstellation Program(cxp) ARE Continuously Under Development in Concert With CXP Formulation and Implementation. Fdoc Applies to the Facilities of These Three Programs, and ANY Other HSF Program Requiring Mission Operations Facility Support. in Addition, Future Mission Operations Facilities and Capabilities ARE Within the Technical Scope of This SOW, and Fdoc Worlk Associated With These Facilities Will BE Enabled Through Idiq — $1.3B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- National Airspace System (NAS) Implementation Support Contract (nisc). Provides Engineering and Technical Support Services to FAA Organizations Responsible for NAS Transformation, Integration and Implementation in the Areas of Implementation and Integration Planning, Transition Planning, Engineering Support, Environmental Support, Automation Support and Other Engineering and Technical Disciplines AS Required. TAS::69 8107::TAS — $1.1B (Department of Transportation)
- Itssc Task Order for Systems — $1.1B (Social Security Administration)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)