Department of Energy awarded $72.2M for Inertial Confinement Fusion research and development to General Atomics
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $72,228,496 ($72.2M)
Contractor: General Atomics
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2001-03-30
End Date: 2010-05-05
Contract Duration: 3,323 days
Daily Burn Rate: $21.7K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: DEVELOP, FABRICATE, AND DELIVER TARGETS, TARGET COMPONENTS AND TARGET TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF THE INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION PGM
Place of Performance
Location: LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90001
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $72.2 million to GENERAL ATOMICS for work described as: DEVELOP, FABRICATE, AND DELIVER TARGETS, TARGET COMPONENTS AND TARGET TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF THE INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION PGM Key points: 1. Contract focused on developing and delivering targets and technology for a specific fusion program. 2. Long-term contract spanning nearly a decade, indicating a sustained need for these specialized services. 3. Sole-source award suggests unique capabilities or limited market availability for the required technology. 4. Cost-plus-fixed-fee structure allows for cost reimbursement plus a predetermined profit, potentially leading to cost overruns if not managed carefully. 5. The contract's duration and cost point to significant investment in a high-priority research area. 6. Performance period ended in 2010, offering historical data for analysis rather than current market comparison.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $72.2 million over approximately 9 years represents a substantial investment in specialized research and development. Without comparable sole-source contracts for similar inertial confinement fusion target development, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure, while common for R&D, carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not rigorously monitored. Benchmarking against other large-scale R&D projects within the Department of Energy or similar scientific endeavors would be necessary for a more robust comparison.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating that the Department of Energy determined General Atomics possessed unique capabilities or proprietary technology essential for the Inertial Confinement Fusion Program. The absence of a competitive bidding process means that price discovery through market forces was not utilized. This approach is typically justified when only one source can fulfill the requirement, often due to specialized expertise, intellectual property, or critical national security needs.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to competitively bid contracts, as the government lacks the leverage of multiple bidders vying for the contract.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the researchers and institutions involved in the Inertial Confinement Fusion Program, advancing scientific understanding and technological capabilities. Services delivered include the development, fabrication, and delivery of specialized targets and related technology crucial for fusion experiments. The geographic impact is primarily within California, where General Atomics is located, and potentially at national laboratories where the targets are utilized. Workforce implications include employment for highly skilled scientists, engineers, and technicians in specialized fields of physics and engineering.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract structure can incentivize cost overruns if not closely managed.
- Sole-source award limits competitive pressure, potentially impacting price efficiency.
- Long contract duration (over 9 years) increases the risk of scope creep or evolving requirements not being optimally addressed without re-competition.
Positive Signals
- Focus on a critical national research program (Inertial Confinement Fusion) indicates alignment with strategic scientific goals.
- Award to a known entity (General Atomics) suggests a reliance on established expertise for a complex technological challenge.
- The contract's completion implies that the required targets and technology were successfully developed and delivered, meeting program objectives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on advanced physical sciences related to nuclear fusion. The Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) program is a significant area of scientific inquiry with potential long-term energy applications. Spending in this niche R&D area is often characterized by long project timelines, high technical risk, and substantial investment. Comparable spending benchmarks would likely be found within other large-scale physics research initiatives or advanced technology development programs funded by government agencies.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have involved small business set-asides, as indicated by the 'sb': false parameter. General Atomics is a large corporation, and the nature of the specialized R&D likely required significant infrastructure and expertise not typically found in small businesses. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans to small businesses, but given the specialized nature of the work, it's possible that opportunities for small businesses were limited.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Given the R&D nature and long duration, regular progress reviews, technical evaluations, and financial audits would be expected. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) programs
- Department of Energy Fusion Energy Sciences
- Advanced Scientific Research Contracts
- Inertial Confinement Fusion Research
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award requires justification
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee pricing carries cost overrun risk
- Long contract duration may indicate evolving requirements or lack of market alternatives
Tags
research-and-development, inertial-confinement-fusion, department-of-energy, general-atomics, sole-source, cost-plus-fixed-fee, california, large-contract, technology-development, physics, national-program
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $72.2 million to GENERAL ATOMICS. DEVELOP, FABRICATE, AND DELIVER TARGETS, TARGET COMPONENTS AND TARGET TECHNOLOGY IN SUPPORT OF THE INERTIAL CONFINEMENT FUSION PGM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $72.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2001-03-30. End: 2010-05-05.
What was the specific technology or target developed under this contract?
The contract focused on the development, fabrication, and delivery of targets and target components for the Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) Program. While the exact specifications are not detailed in the provided data, ICF targets are typically small, precisely engineered capsules containing fusion fuel (deuterium and tritium). These targets are designed to be compressed and heated by high-energy drivers (like lasers or particle beams) to initiate a fusion reaction. The 'target technology' likely encompassed advancements in materials, fabrication techniques, and the overall design of these complex microstructures to improve fusion yield and efficiency.
How does the $72.2 million cost compare to other ICF research contracts?
Comparing the $72.2 million cost requires context on the scope and duration of other ICF contracts. This contract spanned approximately 9 years (March 2001 to May 2010), averaging around $8 million per year. Major ICF facilities like the National Ignition Facility (NIF) involve costs in the billions of dollars for construction and ongoing operations. However, this specific contract was for the development and delivery of targets, a critical but specialized component. Without access to a database of similar target-specific R&D contracts, a direct benchmark is difficult. It represents a significant, but not unprecedented, investment for a dedicated research and development effort within the broader ICF landscape.
What are the risks associated with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract for R&D?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts, like the one awarded to General Atomics, carry specific risks, particularly in research and development. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor is reimbursed for all allowable costs incurred, plus a predetermined fixed fee representing profit. If costs escalate beyond initial estimates due to unforeseen technical challenges, scope changes, or inefficient management, the government bears the financial burden. While the fixed fee provides some cost certainty regarding profit, it doesn't cap the total contract cost. Effective oversight, rigorous cost tracking, and clear definition of work are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure value for money.
Why was this contract awarded on a sole-source basis?
The sole-source award suggests that the Department of Energy identified General Atomics as the only responsible source capable of meeting the specific requirements for developing and delivering targets and technology for the Inertial Confinement Fusion Program. This could be due to proprietary technology, unique manufacturing capabilities, extensive prior experience with the specific program, or intellectual property rights held by General Atomics. Sole-sourcing bypasses the competitive bidding process, which is typically reserved for situations where competition is not feasible or not in the government's best interest, often due to the specialized and unique nature of the required goods or services.
What is the historical spending trend for Inertial Confinement Fusion targets by the Department of Energy?
Analyzing the historical spending trend for ICF targets requires a broader dataset than provided. This single contract represents a significant outlay ($72.2M over 9 years) for target development. However, it's just one piece of the larger ICF ecosystem, which includes major facility operations (like NIF), driver technology research, and theoretical physics. To understand trends, one would need to examine aggregate spending across multiple contracts and fiscal years related to ICF target fabrication and R&D. It's likely that spending fluctuates based on research priorities, technological advancements, and the lifecycle stage of major ICF facilities. This contract's duration suggests a period of focused investment in target technology.
What are the potential long-term implications of this R&D for energy production?
The long-term implications of research into Inertial Confinement Fusion (ICF) targets are profound, aiming to unlock a potentially clean, abundant, and sustainable energy source. Successful development of efficient and reliable fusion targets is critical for achieving 'ignition' – the point where a fusion reaction produces more energy than is required to initiate it. If ICF technology matures into a viable power generation method, it could significantly reduce reliance on fossil fuels, mitigate climate change, and provide energy security. This contract represents a foundational step in that decades-long scientific endeavor, contributing to the knowledge base and technological capabilities necessary for future fusion power plants.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Energy R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Contractor Details
Address: 3550 GENERAL ATOMICS COURT, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $72,228,496
Exercised Options: $72,228,496
Current Obligation: $72,228,496
Timeline
Start Date: 2001-03-30
Current End Date: 2010-05-05
Potential End Date: 2010-05-05 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-11-29
More Contracts from General Atomics
- CVN 79 Emals Long Lead Time Material — $1.7B (Department of Defense)
- 200310!000495!1700!A8050 !naval AIR Warfare Center, Aircra!n6833503c0205 !A!N! !N! !20030728!20041028!067638957!067638957!859181984!n!general Atomics !3550 General Atomics Court!san Diego !ca!92121!66000!073!06!san Diego !SAN Diego !california!+000004883000!n!n!000107026822!1710!aircraft Landing Equipment !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!2000!not Discernable or Classified !336413!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!y!u!2!002!b! !A!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $928.2M (Department of Defense)
- CVN 78 Production Emals — $710.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200411!001061!1700!A8050 !naval AIR Warfare Center, Aircra!n6833504c0167 !A!N! !N! ! !20040402!20090403!067638957!067638957!859181984!n!general Atomics !3550 General Atomics Court!san Diego !ca!92121!37800!029!34!lakehurst AIR Engine!ocean !NEW Jersey!+000016000000!n!n!000145621824!1710!aircraft Landing Equipment !a1c!other Aircraft Equipment !223 !cvn(x) !541710!A!A!3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1g!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!b!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! !Y! ! !0001! ! — $590.2M (Department of Defense)
- CVN 81 Emals Pre-Production Planning — $511.0M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)