Department of Energy's $45M ITES Contract with PROLOGIC, INC. Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $44,957,044 ($45.0M)
Contractor: Prologic, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2004-07-12
End Date: 2010-04-30
Contract Duration: 2,118 days
Daily Burn Rate: $21.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT (ITES) SERVICES
Place of Performance
Location: MORGANTOWN, MONONGALIA County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26505
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $45.0 million to PROLOGIC, INC. for work described as: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT (ITES) SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $44.96M over its life. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market engagement. 3. Risk appears moderate given the contract type and duration. 4. Sector is IT Services, specifically Computer Facilities Management.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF), which can lead to higher costs if not managed effectively. Benchmarking against similar ITES contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the CPAF structure means the final price is influenced by performance incentives.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing. The CPAF structure requires careful oversight to ensure cost efficiency.
Public Impact
Ensures continued IT infrastructure management for the Department of Energy. Supports critical federal IT operations through specialized services. Potential for cost overruns due to the CPAF contract type. Long contract duration (2004-2010) may indicate stable but potentially outdated service models.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPAF contract type can incentivize cost growth.
- Long contract duration may limit adoption of newer technologies.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Provides essential IT services to a federal agency.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT Services sector, specifically Computer Facilities Management. Spending benchmarks for similar contracts vary widely based on scope and agency needs, but $45M over six years for comprehensive management is within a typical range for large federal IT support.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not a direct participant in this contract award (ss=false, sb=false). This suggests the prime contractor did not subcontract to small businesses or the contract was structured to preclude their involvement.
Oversight & Accountability
The CPAF structure necessitates robust oversight to ensure performance objectives are met and costs are controlled. The long duration of the contract also implies a need for ongoing review to ensure continued relevance and value.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Facilities Management Services
- Department of Energy Contracting
- Department of Energy Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure can lead to higher costs.
- Long contract duration (2004-2010) poses risk of technological obsolescence.
- No indication of small business participation.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics and cost breakdowns hinders full assessment.
Tags
computer-facilities-management-services, department-of-energy, wv, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $45.0 million to PROLOGIC, INC.. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING SUPPORT (ITES) SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROLOGIC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $45.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2004-07-12. End: 2010-04-30.
What was the specific performance criteria that determined the award fee, and how effectively were these criteria managed to ensure value for money?
The specific performance criteria for the award fee are not detailed in the provided data. Effective management of these criteria is crucial for a CPAF contract to ensure the contractor is incentivized for efficiency and quality, rather than just cost reimbursement. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the government received optimal value.
Given the contract's duration from 2004 to 2010, what was the risk of technological obsolescence in the IT services provided?
A contract spanning six years, especially in the rapidly evolving IT sector, carries a significant risk of technological obsolescence. The Department of Energy would need strong contract management to ensure PROLOGIC, INC. was incorporating updated technologies and methodologies, or that the services remained relevant despite the timeframe.
How did the 'Full and Open Competition' process ensure the most effective and cost-efficient IT facilities management services were selected?
Full and Open Competition theoretically maximizes the pool of potential bidders, increasing the likelihood of competitive pricing and innovative solutions. The effectiveness in this case depends on the specific evaluation criteria used during the bidding process and how well they aligned with the agency's needs for Computer Facilities Management Services.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation ID: DE-RP26-03NT41820
Offers Received: 11
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Undersea Sensor Systems Inc (UEI: 349084822)
Address: 1000 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, FAIRMONT, WV, 26554
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $44,957,044
Exercised Options: $44,957,044
Current Obligation: $44,957,044
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2004-07-12
Current End Date: 2010-04-30
Potential End Date: 2010-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-08-09
More Contracts from Prologic, Inc.
- Pocket J 08 Production — $11.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)