DOE's $32M mixed waste disposal contract awarded to EnergySolutions, LLC, with no competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $32,057,514 ($32.1M)

Contractor: Energysolutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 1999-11-15

End Date: 2004-07-19

Contract Duration: 1,708 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR DOE'S MIXED WASTE (LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WITH RCRA WASTE)

Place of Performance

Location: SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE County, UTAH, 84116

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $32.1 million to ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR DOE'S MIXED WASTE (LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WITH RCRA WASTE) Key points: 1. The contract's value of $32 million over its period of performance suggests a significant investment in specialized waste management. 2. The absence of competition for this contract raises questions about potential cost efficiencies and market responsiveness. 3. The long duration of the contract (over 5 years) indicates a sustained need for these disposal services. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to transfer cost risk to the contractor, but without competition, price validation is challenging. 5. The contract's focus on mixed low-level radioactive and RCRA waste highlights a critical environmental and safety requirement for the Department of Energy. 6. The contractor, EnergySolutions, LLC, is a key player in the nuclear waste management sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is difficult due to the lack of competitive bids. The $32 million awarded over approximately 5 years suggests an average annual spend of around $6.4 million. Without comparable contracts or market data from a competitive process, it's hard to definitively assess if this represents excellent value for money. The firm-fixed-price nature implies a negotiated price that, in a sole-source scenario, may not reflect the most cost-effective solution available in a broader market.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not competed. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source is available or when a compelling justification exists for excluding competition. The implications for price discovery are significant; without multiple bidders vying for the contract, there is less pressure to offer the most competitive pricing, potentially leading to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium for these services due to the lack of competitive bidding. The absence of multiple offers means the government did not benefit from the price reductions and innovations that typically arise from a competitive procurement process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Energy and its facilities requiring the safe and compliant disposal of hazardous and radioactive waste. The services delivered include the critical function of managing and disposing of mixed waste, which poses significant environmental and health risks. The geographic impact is primarily focused on the state of Utah, where the contractor's operations are located. The contract supports specialized jobs in the nuclear and hazardous waste management industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The nuclear waste management sector is highly specialized, characterized by stringent regulatory requirements, significant capital investment, and a limited number of qualified providers. Contracts in this area often involve long-term commitments due to the nature of the waste and the facilities required for its treatment and disposal. The Department of Energy is a major client in this sector, managing legacy waste from decades of nuclear research and production. Spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the unique nature of each waste stream and disposal requirement, but contracts of this magnitude are not uncommon for large-scale environmental remediation and disposal projects.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The nature of specialized hazardous waste disposal often favors larger, established companies with the necessary infrastructure, expertise, and regulatory compliance capabilities. This limits opportunities for small businesses to participate directly in such critical government contracts, although they might be involved further down the supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Energy's contracting and program management offices. Given the nature of the work, the Inspector General's office for the Department of Energy would likely have jurisdiction for audits and investigations related to waste management and contract compliance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract awards databases and reporting requirements, but the specifics of day-to-day oversight and performance monitoring are internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-energy, mixed-waste-disposal, radioactive-waste, hazardous-waste, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, energy-solutions-llc, utah, environmental-services, doe-em

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $32.1 million to ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC. DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR DOE'S MIXED WASTE (LOW LEVEL RADIOACTIVE MIXED WITH RCRA WASTE)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENERGYSOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $32.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-11-15. End: 2004-07-19.

What is the track record of EnergySolutions, LLC in handling mixed low-level radioactive and RCRA waste for the Department of Energy?

EnergySolutions, LLC has a significant history of providing waste management and disposal services, including for the Department of Energy. They are known for their expertise in handling complex waste streams, such as mixed radioactive and hazardous waste. Their involvement often spans various aspects of the nuclear lifecycle, from decommissioning to waste treatment and disposal. Specific to DOE, they have been involved in projects at various sites, managing large volumes of waste. Their long-standing presence in the industry suggests a capacity to meet the stringent regulatory and safety requirements associated with these materials. However, a detailed review of their performance on specific DOE contracts, including any past issues or commendations, would require deeper analysis of contract performance reports and agency evaluations.

How does the $32 million contract value compare to similar mixed waste disposal contracts awarded by the DOE or other federal agencies?

Comparing the $32 million value of this contract is challenging without more specific details on the scope of work and duration. However, large-scale mixed waste disposal projects for the DOE can range from tens of millions to billions of dollars, depending on the volume and complexity of the waste, and the required treatment and disposal technologies. Contracts for similar services, especially those involving long-term management of legacy waste, often represent substantial investments. Given that this contract spans over five years, the annual expenditure is approximately $6.4 million. This figure is moderate for the sector, but its true value comparison depends heavily on the specific services rendered and the market rates for those services, which are difficult to ascertain in a sole-source scenario.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical environmental services like mixed waste disposal?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for critical environmental services like mixed waste disposal include potential overpricing, reduced incentive for contractor efficiency, and a lack of innovation. Without competition, the government may not secure the most cost-effective solution, as the contractor faces less pressure to minimize costs. The absence of multiple bidders can also stifle the introduction of new technologies or more efficient processes that might be offered by other qualified firms. Furthermore, a sole-source award can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers or renegotiate terms in the future, especially in a highly specialized field where few alternatives exist. This can impact long-term cost management and service quality.

What is the historical spending pattern for mixed waste disposal services by the Department of Energy?

The Department of Energy has a long and substantial history of spending on mixed waste disposal services, driven by decades of nuclear weapons production and research. This spending is a core component of the DOE's Environmental Management (EM) program, which is responsible for cleaning up the nation's Cold War nuclear legacy. Historical spending has been in the billions of dollars annually, allocated across numerous contracts for characterization, treatment, storage, and disposal of various waste types, including low-level radioactive, transuranic, high-level radioactive, and mixed wastes. The patterns reflect the ongoing challenges of managing aging facilities and complex waste inventories, with significant investments directed towards developing and implementing safe disposal solutions. Spending can fluctuate based on program priorities, available funding, and the completion of major cleanup milestones.

How does the firm-fixed-price contract type influence cost control and risk for this mixed waste disposal contract?

A firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is designed to provide the contractor with a stable price for the scope of work, transferring most of the cost risk to the contractor. For mixed waste disposal, this means EnergySolutions, LLC is responsible for managing all costs associated with performing the services, including labor, materials, equipment, and overhead, to deliver the agreed-upon outcome within the fixed price. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs and operate efficiently to maximize profit. For the government, it offers budget predictability, as the total cost is known upfront. However, in a sole-source context, the 'firm' price might be higher than it would be in a competitive environment, as the contractor may build in a larger contingency to account for unforeseen risks without the pressure of competing bids.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Energy Solutions Performance Strategies Inc. (UEI: 078891647)

Address: 605 NORTH 5600 WEST, SALT LAKE CITY, UT, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $306,568

Exercised Options: $306,568

Current Obligation: $32,057,514

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-11-15

Current End Date: 2004-07-19

Potential End Date: 2004-07-19 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-09-20

More Contracts from Energysolutions, LLC

View all Energysolutions, LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending