DOE's $3.3B Argonne Lab contract with UChicago awarded without competition, spanning 7 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,303,434,240 ($3.3B)

Contractor: University of Chicago

Awarding Agency: Department of Energy

Start Date: 1999-10-08

End Date: 2006-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,549 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.3M/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: OPERATION OF ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60637

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Energy obligated $3.30 billion to UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO for work described as: OPERATION OF ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $3.3 billion over seven years. 2. Lack of competition raises questions about price discovery and potential value. 3. The primary risk lies in the absence of competitive pressure to optimize costs. 4. This falls under the Research and Development sector, specifically physical, engineering, and life sciences.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is 'COST NO FEE', which typically means the government reimburses costs but does not pay a fee. Without a competitive bidding process, it's difficult to assess if the costs are optimized or if the fee structure, if any, is reasonable compared to similar R&D contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as 'NOT COMPETED', indicating a sole-source or limited competition approach. This significantly limits price discovery as there is no benchmark from competing offers. The government relies heavily on the contractor's cost proposals and oversight.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers if efficiencies are not rigorously pursued and monitored by the agency.

Public Impact

Significant taxpayer funds are allocated to a single entity for a long duration. The public may have limited insight into the cost-effectiveness of the research conducted. The absence of competition could stifle innovation in how the laboratory is managed and operated.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract is within the Research and Development sector, specifically for physical, engineering, and life sciences. Federal spending in this area is crucial for innovation but requires careful oversight due to the often intangible nature of outcomes and the potential for cost overruns.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract award. The nature of operating a national laboratory typically involves large-scale infrastructure and expertise, often excluding smaller entities.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of Energy is the awarding and overseeing agency. Given the sole-source nature and cost-reimbursement structure, robust oversight is critical to ensure funds are used efficiently and effectively towards the stated research objectives.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-energy, il, dca, billion-dollar

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Energy awarded $3.30 billion to UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO. OPERATION OF ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.30 billion.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 1999-10-08. End: 2006-09-30.

How does the Department of Energy ensure cost efficiency and value for money in a sole-source, cost-reimbursement contract for operating a national laboratory?

The Department of Energy likely employs rigorous indirect cost rate audits, performance metrics tied to research milestones, and regular reviews of operational expenditures. They would also benchmark against industry standards and potentially conduct market research to ensure the contractor's proposed costs are reasonable, even without direct competition.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a 7-year, $3.3 billion contract without competition for managing a national laboratory?

The primary risks include a lack of incentive for cost savings, potential for scope creep without competitive pressure, and reduced innovation in management practices. There's also a risk that alternative, potentially more cost-effective, management approaches are not explored. The long duration exacerbates these risks.

How effective is this contract structure in achieving the intended research and development goals for Argonne National Laboratory?

The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the statement of work, the strength of the performance metrics, and the rigor of the DOE's oversight. While a sole-source award can ensure continuity and leverage specialized expertise, its effectiveness in driving innovation and efficiency is less guaranteed than a competitive process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: OPERATION OF GOVT OWNED FACILITYOPERATE GOVT OWNED BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST NO FEE (S)

Contractor Details

Address: 5801 SOUTH ELLIS AVENUE, CHICAGO, IL, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Educational Institution, Higher Education, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $105,863,476,199

Exercised Options: $119,780,338,397

Current Obligation: $3,303,434,240

Timeline

Start Date: 1999-10-08

Current End Date: 2006-09-30

Potential End Date: 2006-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-05-03

More Contracts from University of Chicago

View all University of Chicago federal contracts →

Other Department of Energy Contracts

View all Department of Energy contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending