DoD Awards $18M+ for Conservation Facilities, Stronghold Engineering Inc. Secures Contract
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,072,517 ($12.1M)
Contractor: Stronghold Engineering Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-09-29
End Date: 2011-02-22
Contract Duration: 2,703 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 200312!001113!96CE!CW09 !USA ENGINEER DIST LOS ANGELES !DACW0903C0016 !A!N! !N! !20030929!20040929!180672420!180672420!180672420!N!STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INCORPO!3421 GATO COURT !RIVERSIDE !CA!92507!55000!013!04!PHOENIX !MARICOPA !ARIZONA !+000000100000!N!N!000010299127!Y219!OTHER CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !5000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!002!A! !D!N!C! ! !N!A!Y!Y!B! ! ! !A!A!000!A!B!Y!T!N! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: PHOENIX, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85074
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.1 million to STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC for work described as: 200312!001113!96CE!CW09 !USA ENGINEER DIST LOS ANGELES !DACW0903C0016 !A!N! !N! !20030929!20040929!180672420!180672420!180672420!N!STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INCORPO!3421 GATO COURT !RIVERSIDE !CA!92507!55000!013!04!PHOENIX !MARIC… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at over $18 million, was awarded to Stronghold Engineering Inc. 2. This award falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' NAICS code. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The duration of the contract was 2703 days, suggesting a long-term project.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $18,067,242.00 for a duration of 2703 days suggests a significant project. Benchmarking against similar large-scale construction contracts would be necessary for a precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, which typically leads to more competitive pricing as multiple bidders vie for the contract. The price discovery mechanism is robust in such scenarios.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayers likely received a fair price for the services rendered, though the overall value depends on the project's scope and execution.
Public Impact
Significant investment in conservation facilities, potentially improving environmental infrastructure. Job creation and economic activity in Arizona due to the contract award. Potential for long-term environmental benefits from the completed conservation facilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (2703 days) could lead to cost overruns or scope creep if not managed effectively.
- Firm Fixed Price contract may not account for unforeseen material cost increases over the long term.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
- Contract supports conservation efforts, aligning with environmental goals.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the construction sector, specifically 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction.' Spending in this sector can vary widely based on infrastructure needs and government priorities.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded to Stronghold Engineering Inc., a private company. There is no explicit indication of small business participation or subcontracting in the provided data.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, Army Corps of Engineers, suggesting established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration necessitates continuous monitoring for performance and cost control.
Related Government Programs
- Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration (2703 days) increases exposure to economic fluctuations and project management challenges.
- Firm Fixed Price contract may not adequately protect against significant material cost increases over the extended period.
- Lack of specific details on project scope and deliverables hinders a full assessment of value and risk.
- Potential for scope creep or change orders over the long contract term, impacting final cost.
Tags
other-heavy-and-civil-engineering-constr, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.1 million to STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC. 200312!001113!96CE!CW09 !USA ENGINEER DIST LOS ANGELES !DACW0903C0016 !A!N! !N! !20030929!20040929!180672420!180672420!180672420!N!STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INCORPO!3421 GATO COURT !RIVERSIDE !CA!92507!55000!013!04!PHOENIX !MARICOPA !ARIZONA !+000000100000!N!N!000010299127!Y219!OTHER CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES !C2 !CONSTRUCTION !5000!NOT DISCERNABLE OR CLASSIFIED !237990!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-09-29. End: 2011-02-22.
What specific conservation activities or facilities are covered by this contract, and what is the expected environmental impact?
The contract is for 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' under NAICS code 237990. While the specific details are not provided, such facilities typically involve projects like water management systems, land restoration, or habitat development. The expected environmental impact would depend on the precise nature of the facilities, aiming to improve ecological health, resource management, or mitigate environmental damage.
Given the firm fixed price and long duration, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks associated with potential cost escalations or changes in material prices?
Firm Fixed Price contracts generally place the risk of cost escalation on the contractor. However, for very long durations, contract modifications or contingency clauses might exist to address significant, unforeseen economic shifts. Robust project management and change order controls by the contracting agency are crucial to manage these risks effectively.
How does the $18M+ award compare to typical spending for similar conservation facility projects by the Army Corps of Engineers?
Without specific benchmarks for 'Other Conservation & Development Facilities' projects by the Army Corps of Engineers, it's difficult to definitively state how $18M+ compares. However, this is a substantial award, suggesting a project of significant scale or complexity. Further analysis would require comparing it to historical data for similar projects within the agency and sector.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3421 GATO COURT, RIVERSIDE, CA, 92507
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-09-29
Current End Date: 2011-02-22
Potential End Date: 2011-02-22 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-02-25
More Contracts from Stronghold Engineering Inc
- Grca 190083 / 250176 - Improve Potable Water Supply to Inner-Canyon and South RIM, Trans-Canyon Water Distribution Pipeline, Grand Canyon National Park, AZ — $217.0M (Department of the Interior)
- Comprehensive Seismic and Life/Safety Renovations for Floors 1 - 8 AT the Federal Building, 300 North LOS Angeles Street, LOS Angeles, CA — $80.2M (General Services Administration)
- RM15-2763 Repair and Replace Electrical System Requirements Within the Naval Supply Systems Command (navsup) Fleet Logistics Center Pearl Harbor (flcph) Area, Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam (jbphh), Hawaii — $68.2M (Department of Defense)
- Hvac and Ductwork Repairs (phases 2&3) AT Naval Medical Center, SAN Diego, CA — $51.8M (Department of Defense)
- Dietetics B300 — $44.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)