DoD Awards $13.7M Facilities Support Services Contract to Chugach McKinley, Inc. in Alaska
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,679,633 ($13.7M)
Contractor: Chugach Mckinley, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2003-06-24
End Date: 2005-09-30
Contract Duration: 829 days
Daily Burn Rate: $16.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: FORT WAINWRIGHT, FAIRBANKS NORTH STAR County, ALASKA, 99703
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.7 million to CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded for facilities support services in Alaska. 2. Chugach McKinley, Inc. is the contractor. 3. The contract was not available for competition. 4. This award falls under the Facilities Support Services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value is $13.7 million over approximately 2.7 years. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar services in Alaska, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration and value suggest a significant service requirement.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was designated as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a limited competition approach. This likely means only one source was considered, potentially impacting price discovery and the ability to secure the most competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competitive award. The specific impact is unknown without further analysis of the pricing justification.
Public Impact
Essential facilities support services provided to the Department of the Army in Alaska. Potential impact on local employment and businesses through contract execution. Ensures operational readiness of military facilities through consistent service provision.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition raises concerns about potential overpricing.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes value assessment challenging.
- Contract duration is substantial, requiring ongoing oversight.
Positive Signals
- Provides critical support services to military operations.
- Contract awarded to a company with a presence in Alaska.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing maintenance, repair, and operational support for government facilities. Spending in this sector can vary significantly based on geographic location, facility type, and service scope.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this award.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants scrutiny to ensure proper justification and that taxpayer funds are used efficiently. Robust oversight is needed to monitor performance and costs throughout the contract's life.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition may lead to inflated costs.
- Lack of transparency in pricing justification.
- Potential for vendor lock-in.
- No small business participation noted.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, ak, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.7 million to CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHUGACH MCKINLEY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.7 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2003-06-24. End: 2005-09-30.
What was the specific justification for limiting competition on this contract, and how was the pricing determined to be fair and reasonable?
The justification for limiting competition is not provided in the data. Typically, such limitations require a detailed rationale, such as unique capabilities or urgent needs. The pricing determination would normally involve cost analysis or comparison to market data, but without that information, it's difficult to assess its fairness and reasonableness.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source or limited-competition contract for facilities support services in a remote location like Alaska?
Risks include higher costs due to lack of competitive pressure, potential for vendor complacency, and limited options if performance issues arise. In remote locations, logistical challenges can also exacerbate costs and impact service delivery, making robust contract management crucial.
How effectively does this contract ensure the continuous and reliable operation of critical Army facilities in Alaska?
The contract's effectiveness hinges on the contractor's performance and the agency's oversight. While the award aims to ensure operational readiness, the limited competition and lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data make it difficult to definitively assess effectiveness. Ongoing monitoring is key.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: TRANSPORT, TRAVEL, RELOCATION › MOTOR POOL OR PACKING/CRATING
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Chugach Alaska Corporation (UEI: 071844021)
Address: 560 EAST 34TH AVENUE, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2003-06-24
Current End Date: 2005-09-30
Potential End Date: 2007-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-01-29
More Contracts from Chugach Mckinley, Inc.
- Federal Contract — $228.0M (Department of Defense)
- 200401!041002!1700!BW10C !naval Surface Warfare Center, Da!n0017804c2072 !A!N! !Y! ! !20031001!20080930!038522876!038522876!071844021!n!chugach Mckinley, Inc !560 East 34TH Avenue !anchorage !ak!99503!21008!099!51!dahlgren !king George !virginia !+000000416000!n!n!000008334538!d301!adp Facility Operation & Maintenance Services !S1 !services !000 !* !541513!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!b!f!n!n!z!b!n!u!1!001!n!5a!z!y!z! ! !n!a!n!n!e! ! ! !D!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! !N00178!0001! ! — $79.5M (Department of Defense)
- Provide Vocational and Academic Services to Youth Ages 16 to 24 OLD — $52.2M (Department of Labor)
- Federal Contract — $43.0M (Department of Defense)
- Construct Gateway Center — $32.2M (Department of Health and Human Services)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)