DoD's $48.6M sustainment contract with URS Federal Services Inc. awarded under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $48,569,354 ($48.6M)

Contractor: URS Federal Services Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-10-15

End Date: 2014-04-30

Contract Duration: 2,023 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FOCUSED SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: GERMANTOWN, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20876

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $48.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC. for work described as: FOCUSED SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT Key points: 1. Contract value of $48.6M over its period of performance suggests a significant investment in sustainment services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a broad market solicitation and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The contract's duration of over 5 years (October 2008 - April 2014) allowed for long-term planning and execution. 4. The 'MD' contract type (likely Materiel/Maintenance/Supply) points to a focus on logistical support and readiness. 5. The 'AW' designation of 'DO' (Definitive contract, Other than cost-reimbursement) suggests a fixed-price or time-and-materials structure. 6. The presence of 6 bids indicates a healthy level of interest from potential contractors.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $48.6M contract is challenging without specific service details or comparable contract data. However, the duration of over five years suggests a substantial commitment. The time and materials pricing structure, while flexible, can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Further analysis would require understanding the specific sustainment activities performed and their associated labor rates and material costs compared to industry standards.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition,' meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The fact that 6 bids were received indicates a competitive environment for this particular sustainment requirement. A higher number of bidders generally suggests a more robust competition, which can lead to better pricing and terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition and multiple bids likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition scenario.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from the sustainment services, ensuring operational readiness of critical assets. Services provided likely include maintenance, repair, logistics, and supply chain management for military equipment. The contract's geographic impact is not specified but likely supports Army operations within a designated region. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for personnel with specialized sustainment and technical skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not closely monitored for scope creep and efficiency.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the contractor's efficiency and effectiveness.
The broad nature of 'sustainment' requires detailed understanding of services to ensure value for money.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process that should yield fair pricing.
Multiple bids (6) indicate market interest and a degree of contractor availability for these services.
The long-term nature of the contract allows for stable support and potential for relationship building with the contractor.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically focusing on sustainment services. Sustainment is a critical component of defense spending, encompassing the maintenance, repair, and logistical support required to keep military platforms and equipment operational. The market for defense sustainment is substantial, involving numerous contractors specializing in various aspects of equipment lifecycle management. This contract represents a portion of the broader spending on maintaining military readiness and operational capability.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB=false) and does not specify subcontracting goals. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless URS Federal Services Inc. actively engaged small businesses as subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and administrative contracting officer within the Department of the Army. Performance monitoring, invoice review, and compliance checks are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) contracts
Military equipment maintenance contracts
Aerospace sustainment services
Government IT sustainment contracts
Base Operations Support (BOS) contracts

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type requires careful monitoring to control costs.
Lack of specific performance metrics hinders objective evaluation.
Scope of 'sustainment' is broad and requires detailed definition for value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $48.6 million to URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC.. FOCUSED SUSTAINMENT CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is URS FEDERAL SERVICES INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $48.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-10-15. End: 2014-04-30.

What specific types of equipment or systems did this sustainment contract cover?

The provided data does not specify the exact equipment or systems covered under this sustainment contract. 'Sustainment' is a broad term that can encompass a wide range of activities, including maintenance, repair, overhaul, logistics, and supply chain management for various military assets. These could range from vehicles and aircraft to communication systems or weapons platforms. Without more detailed contract documentation, the precise scope of services remains undefined. Understanding the specific assets supported is crucial for evaluating the contract's true value and necessity.

How does the awarded amount of $48.6 million compare to similar sustainment contracts for comparable military assets?

Direct comparison of the $48.6 million award to similar sustainment contracts is difficult without knowing the specific assets and services involved. Sustainment costs vary significantly based on the complexity, age, and operational tempo of the equipment. For instance, sustaining aging aircraft fleets typically incurs higher costs than maintaining ground vehicles. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify contracts for similar platforms (e.g., specific aircraft models, vehicle types) with comparable service durations and scope (e.g., full logistics support vs. depot-level maintenance). The 'MD' PSC code suggests materiel/maintenance/supply, which is broad.

What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate URS Federal Services Inc.'s performance under this contract?

The provided summary data does not include information on the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate URS Federal Services Inc.'s performance. Typically, government contracts include performance standards related to response times, repair turnaround times, availability rates, quality of work, and adherence to schedules. The effectiveness of the oversight mechanisms and the contracting officer's representative (COR) would be critical in monitoring these metrics. Without access to the contract's statement of work (SOW) and performance reports, assessing the contractor's actual performance quality is not possible from this data alone.

What was the historical spending trend for this specific sustainment requirement prior to this contract award?

The provided data focuses solely on this specific contract (ID: not provided, but implied by the data points) awarded in October 2008. It does not offer any historical spending context for this particular sustainment requirement before this award. To understand historical spending trends, one would need to access procurement records for the preceding years, identifying any previous contracts, their values, durations, and awarded contractors for the same or similar sustainment services. This would reveal whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable over time for this requirement.

Were there any significant contract modifications or change orders issued during the life of this contract?

The summary data does not indicate whether there were significant contract modifications or change orders issued during the life of this contract (October 15, 2008 - April 30, 2014). Such modifications, if substantial, could alter the original scope, duration, or total cost. Analyzing contract modification history is essential for a complete understanding of the final cost and the evolution of the requirement. Accessing the contract's official file or modification logs would be necessary to determine if significant changes occurred.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM Global II, LLC (UEI: 043271568)

Address: 175 ADMIRAL COCHRANE DR, ANNAPOLIS, MD, 03

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,569,354

Exercised Options: $48,569,354

Current Obligation: $48,569,354

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DAAE0798DT060

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline