DoD's $28M environmental remediation contract awarded to Hydrogeologic, Inc. for Fort McClellan sites
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,081,584 ($28.1M)
Contractor: Hydrogeologic, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2014-09-04
End Date: 2020-09-02
Contract Duration: 2,190 days
Daily Burn Rate: $12.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF WORLDWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION CONTRACT TO PERFORM REMEDIATION AT FOUR SITES AT FORT MCCLELLAN&ANNISTON, AL
Place of Performance
Location: ANNISTON, CALHOUN County, ALABAMA, 36201
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.1 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF WORLDWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION CONTRACT TO PERFORM REMEDIATION AT FOUR SITES AT FORT MCCLELLAN&ANNISTON, AL Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value of $28.1 million covers remediation services over a period of approximately 6 years. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. 4. The contract was awarded as a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger indefinite-delivery contract vehicle. 5. The remediation services are to be performed at Fort McClellan, Alabama, addressing environmental concerns at four specific sites. 6. The contractor, Hydrogeologic, Inc., has experience in environmental remediation services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $28.1 million for environmental remediation at four sites over six years appears reasonable given the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar large-scale environmental cleanup contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts cost risk to the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if managed effectively. However, without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry standards for specific remediation activities, a definitive assessment of pricing efficiency is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which suggests that while the competition was broad, there might have been specific reasons for excluding certain sources initially. The presence of two bids indicates some level of competition, but the exact number of solicitations and proposals received would offer a clearer picture of the competitive landscape. A limited number of bidders can sometimes lead to less aggressive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, even with a limited number of bidders, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing and ensuring a wider pool of qualified contractors is considered.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Department of Defense and potentially the local community in Anniston, Alabama, through the cleanup of environmental contamination. The services delivered involve environmental remediation, likely addressing hazardous waste, soil, or groundwater contamination at former military sites. The geographic impact is localized to Fort McClellan and the surrounding Anniston, Alabama area. The contract supports jobs in the environmental services sector, including scientists, engineers, and remediation technicians.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen environmental conditions are encountered, despite the firm-fixed-price structure.
- The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation to understand its impact on competition and potential cost savings.
- Long-term effectiveness of remediation strategies needs ongoing monitoring.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract type transfers cost risk to the contractor.
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
- Contractor has specific expertise in environmental remediation.
Sector Analysis
Environmental remediation is a critical sector within the broader environmental services industry, which is driven by regulatory compliance and the need to address historical contamination. The market includes a range of companies specializing in hazardous waste management, site cleanup, and environmental consulting. Government contracts, particularly from agencies like the Department of Defense, represent a significant portion of this market due to the extensive landholdings and historical operations of military facilities.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, and the prime contractor, Hydrogeologic, Inc., is not listed as a small business. Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is likely minimal. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services or labor, contributing indirectly to the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the Department of the Army. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract implies that oversight will focus on ensuring the contractor meets the defined scope of work and performance standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific details of the remediation process might be less publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Environmental Remediation Services
- Department of Defense Cleanup Programs
- Superfund Site Remediation
- Military Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Environmental Actions
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Risk of unforeseen environmental conditions impacting cost and schedule.
- Need for ongoing monitoring to ensure long-term effectiveness of remediation.
Tags
environmental-remediation, department-of-defense, army, fort-mcclellan, alabama, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, remediation-services, hazardous-waste
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.1 million to HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF WORLDWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION CONTRACT TO PERFORM REMEDIATION AT FOUR SITES AT FORT MCCLELLAN&ANNISTON, AL
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is HYDROGEOLOGIC, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2014-09-04. End: 2020-09-02.
What is the track record of Hydrogeologic, Inc. in performing similar environmental remediation contracts for the Department of Defense?
Hydrogeologic, Inc. has a history of performing environmental services, including remediation, for various government agencies. Their specific track record with the Department of Defense on large-scale projects similar to the Fort McClellan contract would need to be reviewed through contract performance reports (e.g., CPARS) and past performance questionnaires. A review of their contract history would reveal the types of sites they have remediated, the technologies employed, and their success in meeting project deadlines and budget constraints. Understanding their experience with firm-fixed-price contracts of this magnitude is crucial for assessing their capability to manage this specific award effectively and mitigate potential risks.
How does the $28.1 million contract value compare to similar environmental remediation projects at military installations?
The $28.1 million contract value for remediating four sites at Fort McClellan over approximately six years needs to be benchmarked against comparable projects. Factors influencing cost include the type and extent of contamination (e.g., soil, groundwater, hazardous waste), the remediation technologies required, site accessibility, and regulatory requirements. Larger, more complex sites or those requiring advanced treatment methods typically incur higher costs. A comparative analysis with other DoD environmental cleanup contracts, considering the number of sites, the duration, and the specific remediation activities, would help determine if this contract represents good value for money. Without such a comparison, it's difficult to definitively assess its cost-effectiveness.
What are the primary environmental risks being addressed by this contract, and what remediation strategies are anticipated?
The primary environmental risks addressed by this contract are likely related to historical contamination at Fort McClellan, which may include hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants in soil, groundwater, or surface water. Specific risks could stem from past military training activities, storage of chemicals, or disposal practices. Anticipated remediation strategies could involve a range of techniques such as excavation and off-site disposal, in-situ treatment (e.g., bioremediation, chemical oxidation), containment systems (e.g., capping, slurry walls), or long-term monitoring. The exact strategies would be detailed in the contract's statement of work and depend on the specific contaminants and site conditions identified through environmental assessments.
What is the significance of the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type for this contract?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' award type suggests that the solicitation was initially open to all responsible sources, but certain sources were excluded prior to award. This exclusion could be based on various factors, such as past performance issues, lack of specific qualifications, or other pre-defined criteria. While it still aims for broad competition, the exclusion implies a narrowed field. The fact that only two bids were received could be a consequence of this exclusion or reflect the specialized nature of the services required. Understanding the rationale behind the source exclusion is key to assessing whether it potentially limited competition and impacted the final price achieved for the government.
What are the potential long-term implications of this remediation contract for the Fort McClellan site and the surrounding community?
The long-term implications of this remediation contract are primarily positive, focusing on environmental restoration and public health protection. By addressing contamination at Fort McClellan, the contract contributes to making the site safer for future use, whether that involves continued military operations, transfer to other government agencies, or civilian redevelopment. For the surrounding community in Anniston, Alabama, successful remediation reduces potential exposure pathways to hazardous substances, thereby safeguarding local ecosystems and human health. It also demonstrates the government's commitment to environmental stewardship and fulfilling its obligations under environmental laws.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Remediation and Other Waste Management Services › Remediation Services
Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT › NATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11107 SUNSET HILLS RD STE 400, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,081,584
Exercised Options: $28,081,584
Current Obligation: $28,081,584
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 14
Total Subaward Amount: $22,991,730
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W912DY10D0023
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2014-09-04
Current End Date: 2020-09-02
Potential End Date: 2020-09-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2022-02-17
More Contracts from Hydrogeologic, Inc.
- Racs II Region III Contract — $59.5M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- FY21 Norco HGL — $55.7M (Department of Defense)
- Remediation/Demolition of U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center (ccdc) and U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense (mricd) Facilities Group 2 Facilities Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland — $49.9M (Department of Defense)
- Performance Based Remediation Services — $48.6M (Department of Defense)
- APG Remediation/Demolition Group 1 — $37.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)