CFPB Spends $24.4M on Management Consulting Services via BPA Call with PwC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,433,098 ($24.4M)

Contractor: Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP

Awarding Agency: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Start Date: 2012-09-28

End Date: 2015-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,005 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES SERVICE CONTRACT CODING: CRITICAL

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20552

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau obligated $24.4 million to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES SERVICE CONTRACT CODING: CRITICAL Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $24.4 million for management consulting. 2. Awarded to a single, well-known vendor, PwC. 3. Potential for concentrated risk due to single vendor. 4. Services fall under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value is substantial. Without specific task orders or comparable benchmarks, assessing the pricing's excellence is difficult. The BPA Call structure suggests potential for competitive pricing across individual orders, but the overall value requires scrutiny.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition via a BPA Call. This method allows for competitive pricing on individual task orders, but the initial BPA setup's pricing and the overall vendor selection process are key to price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds totaling $24.4 million were allocated for these consulting services, necessitating careful oversight to ensure value for money.

Public Impact

Consumers may benefit from improved agency operations funded by these services. Transparency in how consulting funds are utilized is crucial for public trust. The use of a BPA Call indicates a structured approach to acquiring services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Benchmarks for similar large-scale consulting engagements vary widely based on scope and agency, but $24.4 million represents a significant investment.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a factor (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests the primary award was not structured to benefit small businesses directly.

Oversight & Accountability

The use of a BPA Call implies a framework for oversight. However, detailed oversight of individual task orders and performance metrics is essential to ensure accountability and prevent waste.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, consumer-financial-protection-bureau, dc, bpa-call, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau awarded $24.4 million to PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP. IGF::CT::IGF MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES SERVICE CONTRACT CODING: CRITICAL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-09-28. End: 2015-06-30.

What specific management challenges did the CFPB aim to address with this $24.4 million contract, and how were the consulting services tailored to meet those needs effectively?

The contract data does not specify the exact management challenges. However, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' typically address areas like organizational efficiency, strategic planning, process improvement, and operational effectiveness. The effectiveness would be measured by the successful implementation of recommendations and the achievement of defined agency goals related to these areas.

Given the full and open competition, what was the competitive landscape like for the initial BPA, and how did the pricing structure ensure value for money across multiple task orders?

While the initial BPA was awarded under full and open competition, the specific details of the bidding process and the resulting pricing structure are not provided. A well-structured BPA Call should include competitive pricing mechanisms for task orders, potentially through tiered rates or competitive bidding for larger orders, to ensure ongoing value for money.

What mechanisms were in place to monitor the performance and impact of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's consulting services to ensure they delivered tangible benefits to the CFPB and, by extension, consum

The provided data lacks specific details on performance monitoring. Typically, agencies use performance work statements, key performance indicators (KPIs), regular progress reports, and formal reviews to track contractor performance and impact. The success of the contract hinges on robust oversight and clear metrics for evaluating the delivered value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 TYSON BLVD 9TH FL, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,433,125

Exercised Options: $24,433,098

Current Obligation: $24,433,098

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: CFP12Z00015

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-09-28

Current End Date: 2015-06-30

Potential End Date: 2015-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-15

More Contracts from Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP

View all Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP federal contracts →

Other Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Contracts

View all Consumer Financial Protection Bureau contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending