DoD Awards Jacobs Engineering $10.1M for ZSCHEIGNER Remediation Services Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,122,747 ($10.1M)

Contractor: Jacobs Engineering Group Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-04-27

End Date: 2010-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,283 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: ZSCHEIGNER REMEDIATION

Place of Performance

Location: HOWELL, MONMOUTH County, NEW JERSEY, 07731

State: New Jersey Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $10.1 million to JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC for work described as: ZSCHEIGNER REMEDIATION Key points: 1. The contract value is $10.1 million, awarded to Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is 1283 days, ending in October 2010. 4. The NAICS code 562910 indicates Remediation Services, a specialized environmental sector. 5. The award type 'DO' and 'AW' are not standard federal award types and require clarification.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF), which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Without specific performance metrics or benchmarks for remediation services, assessing value is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition was used, which generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing. However, the effectiveness of this competition for specialized remediation services needs further review.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for environmental remediation services. The CPFF contract type necessitates close oversight to ensure cost efficiency and prevent unnecessary expenditures.

Public Impact

Environmental cleanup services are crucial for public health and safety. The remediation of ZSCHEIGNER site impacts the local environment in New Jersey. Government contracts for environmental services can be complex and require specialized expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

Remediation services fall under the environmental consulting and engineering sector. Spending in this sector is driven by regulatory compliance, infrastructure needs, and historical contamination cleanup. Benchmarks for similar remediation contracts would be valuable for comparison.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (ss=false, sb=false). This suggests the prime contractor is likely a large business, and subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not explicitly detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

The CPFF contract type requires robust oversight to manage costs and ensure performance. The unclear award types ('DO', 'AW') warrant further investigation into the specific oversight mechanisms in place.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

remediation-services, department-of-defense, nj, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $10.1 million to JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC. ZSCHEIGNER REMEDIATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-04-27. End: 2010-10-31.

What specific remediation activities were performed under this contract, and were they completed effectively and within budget?

The provided data does not detail the specific remediation activities or their outcomes. A Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract requires diligent oversight to ensure that costs are reasonable and that the fixed fee is earned through satisfactory performance. Without performance reports or completion data, assessing effectiveness and budget adherence is not possible from this dataset alone.

How did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers given the specialized nature of remediation services?

While full and open competition is a positive indicator for price discovery, its effectiveness for specialized services like remediation depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the quality of proposals received, and the evaluation criteria used. Without access to the solicitation and evaluation details, it's difficult to definitively assess if the competitive process yielded the best value, especially considering the CPFF structure which shifts some risk to the government.

What is the significance of the 'DO' and 'AW' award types, and what oversight mechanisms are in place for this contract?

The award types 'DO' and 'AW' are not standard federal award classifications and require clarification from the awarding agency. Their presence suggests potential non-standard contracting procedures or internal agency codes. Robust oversight would typically involve regular progress reports, cost audits, and performance reviews, especially crucial for CPFF contracts to manage risks and ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTNATURAL RESOURCES - OTHER SVCS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1111 S ARROYO PKY, PASADENA, CA, 28

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,122,747

Exercised Options: $10,122,747

Current Obligation: $10,122,747

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912QR04D0026

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-04-27

Current End Date: 2010-10-31

Potential End Date: 2010-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-05-10

More Contracts from Jacobs Engineering Group Inc

View all Jacobs Engineering Group Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending