GSA awards $10.9M contract to C&W Facility Services for facility support services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,919,109 ($10.9M)
Contractor: C&W Facility Services Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 1999-11-15
End Date: 2008-08-31
Contract Duration: 3,212 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: MASSACHUSETTS
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $10.9 million to C&W FACILITY SERVICES INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract awarded to C&W Facility Services Inc. for facility support. 2. The contract spans nearly nine years, indicating a long-term need. 3. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract value is substantial at over $10.9 million.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $10.9 million over 3212 days (approx. 8.8 years) averages to roughly $1.24 million per year. Without specific service details or benchmarks for facility services in Massachusetts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the duration suggests potential for economies of scale.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes price discovery. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by securing the best value through a competitive process.
Public Impact
Ensures continued operation of federal facilities through essential support services. Supports jobs within the facility services industry. The long duration of the contract provides stability for both the government and the contractor.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to price increases over time if not managed.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it hard to assess value for money.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to the extended period.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
- Contract provides essential services for government operations.
- Long-term award can lead to contractor expertise and efficiency.
Sector Analysis
Facility services encompass a broad range of support functions for buildings, including maintenance, cleaning, security, and operations. Spending in this sector is driven by the need to maintain government infrastructure and ensure operational continuity. Benchmarks are highly dependent on the specific services provided and geographic location.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Full and open competition does not inherently exclude small businesses, but their participation level is not specified here.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing federal real estate and facility management. Oversight would typically involve contract performance monitoring, invoice review, and ensuring compliance with contract terms.
Related Government Programs
- General Services Administration Contracting
- Public Buildings Service Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration.
- Lack of detailed service breakdown.
- Potential for service quality degradation over time.
- No explicit mention of small business participation.
Tags
general-services-administration, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $10.9 million to C&W FACILITY SERVICES INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is C&W FACILITY SERVICES INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 1999-11-15. End: 2008-08-31.
What specific facility services are included under this contract, and how do their costs compare to industry averages for similar services in Massachusetts?
The provided data lacks specifics on the exact services rendered. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, security) is needed. Comparing these line-item costs against regional benchmarks for facility management contracts would reveal if the $10.9 million award represents a fair price or if there are opportunities for cost savings through renegotiation or improved service delivery.
Given the nearly nine-year duration, what mechanisms are in place to mitigate risks associated with potential cost escalation or declining service quality over time?
Long-term contracts require robust oversight. Mechanisms to mitigate risk could include annual price adjustments tied to inflation indices (like CPI), performance-based payment structures, clear service level agreements with penalties for non-compliance, and regular performance reviews. The contract's fixed-price nature might limit direct cost escalation but could incentivize cost-cutting that impacts quality if not monitored.
How effectively did the 'full and open competition' process ensure the government received the best possible value for these facility services?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and price competition. Its effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation, the number and quality of bids received, and the evaluation criteria used. Without knowing the number of bidders or the evaluation process, it's difficult to definitively state effectiveness, but the method itself is a strong indicator of an intent to secure competitive pricing.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Contractor Details
Parent Company: UGL Limited (UEI: 757676945)
Address: 275 GROVE STREET, AUBURNDALE, MA, 04
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,371,157
Exercised Options: $4,371,157
Current Obligation: $10,919,109
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Timeline
Start Date: 1999-11-15
Current End Date: 2008-08-31
Potential End Date: 2008-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-07-08
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)