GSA's $14.6M Contract with Northrop Grumman for IT Services: A Competitive Delivery Order Analysis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,634,489 ($14.6M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2001-11-15

End Date: 2005-11-30

Contract Duration: 1,476 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC for work described as: Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc. totals $14,634,489.23. 2. This was a competitive delivery order, suggesting a degree of market vetting. 3. The contract duration was 1476 days, ending in November 2005. 4. The sector appears to be Information Technology, a common area for federal spending. 5. The use of Time and Materials pricing warrants scrutiny for cost control.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Time and Materials pricing structure can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored. Benchmarking against similar IT service contracts from the early 2000s would be necessary for a definitive value assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

As a competitive delivery order, there was an expectation of price discovery through competition. However, the effectiveness of this competition is dependent on the number of bidders and the specific terms negotiated.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for IT services. The ultimate impact depends on the value delivered relative to the cost and the efficiency of the procurement process.

Public Impact

Federal agencies rely on contractors for essential IT services, impacting operational efficiency. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term need for these services. Procurement methods like competitive delivery orders aim to balance speed and cost-effectiveness for the government.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, which represents a significant portion of federal spending. Benchmarks for IT services vary widely based on complexity and duration, but consistent oversight is key.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to assess small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Accountability would involve monitoring performance, costs, and adherence to contract terms throughout its lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

general-services-administration, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14.6 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC. See the official description on USAspending.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2001-11-15. End: 2005-11-30.

What was the specific scope of work for these IT services, and how did it align with agency needs?

The provided data lacks details on the specific scope of work. Understanding the services rendered (e.g., software development, network maintenance, help desk support) is crucial for assessing value. Without this, it's difficult to determine if the $14.6M was efficiently spent or if the services truly met the agency's evolving technological requirements during the contract period.

Were there any performance issues or cost overruns associated with the Time and Materials pricing?

The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model carries inherent risks of cost escalation if not managed rigorously. While the contract was completed, the data doesn't reveal if Northrop Grumman exceeded initial estimates or if the agency actively managed labor hours and material costs to mitigate potential overspending. Post-contract reviews or performance reports would clarify this.

How effective was the competitive process in securing favorable pricing and terms for the government?

The contract was awarded via a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' suggesting multiple bids were considered. However, the effectiveness hinges on the number of competitors, the quality of their proposals, and the negotiation leverage GSA possessed. Without knowing the bid landscape or the final negotiated rates, it's challenging to definitively state how well this competitive process served taxpayer interests.

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Titan II Inc. (UEI: 016435559)

Address: 2411 DULLES CORNER PARK #, HERNDON, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,634,489

Exercised Options: $14,634,489

Current Obligation: $14,634,489

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS09K99BHD0009

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline

Start Date: 2001-11-15

Current End Date: 2005-11-30

Potential End Date: 2005-11-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2012-05-04

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc

View all Northrop Grumman Information Technology Inc federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending