Army's APS-3 Afloat Mission Contract Exceeds $184M with KBR Wyle Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $184,336,668 ($184.3M)
Contractor: KBR Wyle Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2009-09-14
End Date: 2014-09-14
Contract Duration: 1,826 days
Daily Burn Rate: $101.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Engineering Services
Official Description: ARMY PREPOSISTIONED STOCKS-3 (APS-3) AFLOAT MISSION
Place of Performance
Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20170
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $184.3 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC for work described as: ARMY PREPOSISTIONED STOCKS-3 (APS-3) AFLOAT MISSION Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at over $184 million. 2. KBR Wyle Services, LLC is the sole awardee. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which can lead to higher costs. 4. Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) is the sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type allows for cost reimbursement plus an award fee, which can incentivize performance but also lead to higher overall spending compared to fixed-price contracts. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. However, the specific award mechanism (Delivery Order) and the CPAF structure may have influenced the final price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The substantial contract value indicates significant taxpayer investment. The CPAF structure necessitates careful oversight to ensure award fees are tied to demonstrable performance and value for money.
Public Impact
Supports critical Army prepositioned stocks, ensuring readiness. Long-term contract duration (5 years) indicates ongoing need. Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure. Impacts the logistics and sustainment capabilities of the Army.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- CPAF contract type can inflate costs.
- No small business participation noted.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition was utilized.
- Supports critical military mission.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under Engineering Services, a broad category often involving complex technical support and project management. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project scope and duration, but large-scale defense logistics contracts represent a significant portion of government engineering expenditures.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to small businesses, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or if subcontracting opportunities were made available.
Oversight & Accountability
The Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires robust oversight to ensure that award fees are justified by performance and that costs are reasonable. Monitoring the contractor's performance against established metrics and award criteria is crucial for accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF.
- Lack of small business participation.
- Contract duration is lengthy, requiring sustained oversight.
- Specific performance metrics for award fees not detailed.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $184.3 million to KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC. ARMY PREPOSISTIONED STOCKS-3 (APS-3) AFLOAT MISSION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KBR WYLE SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $184.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2009-09-14. End: 2014-09-14.
What specific engineering services were provided under this contract, and how did they directly contribute to the mission's success?
The contract likely encompassed a range of engineering services essential for managing and maintaining Army Prepositioned Stocks-3 (APS-3) Afloat Mission. This could include technical support, logistics planning, maintenance oversight, and potentially modifications or upgrades to equipment stored on vessels. The success hinges on ensuring these services maintained the readiness and operability of the prepositioned equipment for rapid deployment.
How were the award fees determined and what metrics were used to justify them, given the CPAF structure?
The determination of award fees under a CPAF contract is typically based on pre-defined performance objectives and metrics outlined in the contract. These could include factors like timeliness of support, quality of engineering services, cost control adherence, and overall mission support effectiveness. A thorough review of the contractor's performance against these specific criteria would be necessary to validate the awarded fees.
What is the long-term strategic value of maintaining APS-3 Afloat Mission, and how does this contract support that value?
The APS-3 Afloat Mission provides the Army with strategic depth and rapid deployment capabilities by pre-positioning essential equipment globally. This contract's value lies in ensuring that this critical asset remains mission-ready, maintained, and logistically supported. It underpins the ability to respond to contingencies and sustain operations without immediate resupply from the continental United States.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: KBR, Inc. (UEI: 784072626)
Address: 7000 COLUMBIA GATEWAY DR STE 100, COLUMBIA, MD, 21046
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $184,336,668
Exercised Options: $184,336,668
Current Obligation: $184,336,668
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W911SE07D0014
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2009-09-14
Current End Date: 2014-09-14
Potential End Date: 2014-09-14 12:09:00
Last Modified: 2018-07-24
More Contracts from KBR Wyle Services, LLC
- Bioastronautics Contract-Activities for the Health &productivity of Crews Working and Living in Space — $1.5B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- Fpds-Ng Mission Systems Operations Contract (msoc) — $1.0B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Engineering Services and Related Services to MSD and Related Organizations Throughout Gsfc, AS Required, for the Formulation, Design, Development, Fabrication, Integration, Testing, Verification, and Operations of Space Flight and Ground System Hardware and Software, Including Development and Validation of NEW Technologies to Enable Future Space and Science Missions. the Engineering Areas of Emphasis ARE Multidisciplinary With Concentration in the Mechanical Engineering Areas of Materials, Structural Analysis and Loads, Mechanical Design, Electromechanical Design, Thermal, Contamination and Coatings, Manufacturing and Integration and Test — $728.5M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200106!000121!1700!F7004 !marine Corps Logistics Base !M6700499C0002 !a!n!*!n!p00015 !20010228!20080930!041014242!041014242!139691877!n!honeywell Technology Solutions!7000 Columbia Gateway Driv!columbia !md!21046!35000!031!12!jacksonville !duval !florida !+000004292865!n!n!000000000000!j049!maint & Repair of Eq/Maintenance & Repair Shop EQ !a4a!combat Vehicles !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !811310!*!*!3! ! !C!*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !N!J!2!006!B! !C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $670.1M (Department of Defense)
- Mission Operations Management Services (moms) — $623.8M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)