USAID's $16.3M contract for specialized court reform in Indonesia awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,330,221 ($16.3M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2005-12-28

End Date: 2010-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,495 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.9K/day

Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: TAS::72 1000::TAS INDONESIA SPECIALIZED COURT REFORM&STRENGTHENING ACTIVITY

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $16.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: TAS::72 1000::TAS INDONESIA SPECIALIZED COURT REFORM&STRENGTHENING ACTIVITY Key points: 1. Contract awarded via competitive delivery order, suggesting a degree of market vetting. 2. The contract duration of approximately 4 years indicates a substantial, long-term project. 3. Focus on administrative and management consulting services points to capacity building and institutional support. 4. The 'Time and Materials' contract type can pose cost control challenges if not closely monitored. 5. Awarded to a single contractor, Booz Allen Hamilton, highlighting their role in this specific initiative. 6. The project's geographic focus on Indonesia suggests a targeted international development effort.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific performance metrics or comparable projects. The 'Time and Materials' pricing structure, while flexible, can lead to higher costs if not managed diligently. The total award amount of $16.3 million over nearly five years suggests a significant investment in court reform, but its cost-effectiveness hinges on the successful achievement of program objectives and the efficiency of service delivery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded as a 'COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER,' indicating it was likely competed under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract. While the specific number of bidders for this particular delivery order isn't detailed, the 'full-and-open' competition designation implies that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and technical solutions, aiming to secure the most value for the government's investment.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Indonesian judicial system and its personnel, who will receive support in court reform and strengthening. Services delivered include administrative management and general management consulting, aimed at improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the courts. The geographic impact is concentrated within Indonesia, specifically targeting its legal and judicial institutions. Workforce implications may include training and capacity building for local judicial staff, as well as potential engagement of international consultants.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to the 'Time and Materials' contract type if not strictly managed.
Measuring the long-term impact and success of court reform activities can be complex and may take years to fully materialize.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant reform effort could limit alternative perspectives or solutions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a vetted selection of the contractor.
The substantial duration indicates a commitment to achieving meaningful, long-term improvements in the Indonesian judicial system.
The focus on specialized court reform addresses a critical area for governance and rule of law.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management and administrative consulting. The global market for such services is vast, with governments frequently engaging consultants for complex reform initiatives, institutional strengthening, and technical assistance. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other USAID or international development agency contracts focused on legal sector reform, governance, or public administration improvements in developing nations.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans is not explicitly provided in the data. As this was a competitive delivery order, it's possible that larger prime contractors like Booz Allen Hamilton may engage small businesses for specific components of the work, but this is not guaranteed without further details on subcontracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Agency for International Development (USAID), likely through a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) responsible for monitoring performance, costs, and adherence to contract terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed programmatic oversight reports are typically internal to the agency.

Related Government Programs

USAID Rule of Law Programs
International Court Modernization Initiatives
Governance and Anti-Corruption Programs
Public Sector Management Consulting Contracts

Risk Flags

Time and Materials contract type may lead to cost overruns.
Measuring the success of long-term reform initiatives can be challenging.
Potential for political or cultural resistance to reform within the target country.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $16.3 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. TAS::72 1000::TAS INDONESIA SPECIALIZED COURT REFORM&STRENGTHENING ACTIVITY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-28. End: 2010-01-31.

What specific metrics were used to evaluate Booz Allen Hamilton's performance on this contract?

The provided data does not include specific performance metrics or evaluation criteria used for this contract. Typically, USAID contracts include a Performance Work Statement (PWS) outlining deliverables and standards, with performance assessed against these requirements. For a court reform project, metrics might include improvements in case processing times, reduction in case backlogs, enhanced judicial training completion rates, or increased public trust in the judiciary. Without access to the PWS and subsequent performance reports, a detailed assessment of Booz Allen Hamilton's performance is not possible based solely on the award data.

How does the $16.3 million cost compare to similar court reform initiatives in other countries?

Directly comparing the $16.3 million cost to similar court reform initiatives globally is difficult without detailed project scopes, durations, and specific objectives. However, international development projects focused on legal and judicial reform can vary significantly in cost based on the size of the country, the depth of the reforms needed, the number of personnel involved, and the duration of the program. For a nearly five-year initiative in a country like Indonesia, $16.3 million represents a substantial but not necessarily outlier investment, especially if it involves extensive training, systemic changes, and technological upgrades. Broader comparisons would require analyzing budgets of similar World Bank, UN, or other bilateral aid agency projects.

What are the primary risks associated with implementing court reform in a foreign country like Indonesia?

Implementing court reform in a foreign country like Indonesia presents several risks. Political instability or shifts in government priorities can disrupt reform efforts. Cultural resistance to change within the judiciary itself can impede progress. Corruption within the existing system may undermine reform initiatives or lead to their manipulation. Logistical challenges, including infrastructure limitations and geographic dispersion, can complicate program delivery. Furthermore, ensuring the sustainability of reforms after external funding ends requires strong local ownership and capacity building. Finally, measuring the tangible impact of reforms on justice delivery and public trust can be complex and subject to various external factors.

What was the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by USAID prior to this contract?

The provided data focuses on a single contract and does not offer historical spending patterns for USAID in the 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS code 541611) category. To analyze historical spending, one would need access to comprehensive contract databases that track awards over multiple fiscal years. Such an analysis would reveal trends in the volume and value of consulting services procured by USAID, potentially identifying periods of increased or decreased investment in this area, and highlighting key contractors or types of services frequently sought.

How effective has Booz Allen Hamilton been in delivering similar international development or governance projects?

Assessing Booz Allen Hamilton's overall effectiveness in similar international development or governance projects requires reviewing their past performance on contracts with agencies like USAID, the Department of State, or other international bodies. While Booz Allen Hamilton is a large, established contractor with a broad portfolio, their success varies by project. Factors to consider include contract award history, any reported performance issues or contract disputes, and publicly available performance evaluations or Inspector General reports related to their international work. Without specific data on this contractor's track record in Indonesian court reform or comparable governance initiatives, a definitive statement on their effectiveness is speculative.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,330,221

Exercised Options: $16,330,221

Current Obligation: $16,330,221

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: AIDAFPI000400005

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline