USAID's $39.6M Education Contract with EDC Faces Scrutiny for Value and Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,601,187 ($39.6M)

Contractor: Education Development Center, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Agency for International Development

Start Date: 2013-01-01

End Date: 2018-07-31

Contract Duration: 2,037 days

Daily Burn Rate: $19.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF BASA PILIPINAS PROJECT

Plain-Language Summary

Agency for International Development obligated $39.6 million to EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF BASA PILIPINAS PROJECT Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Education Development Center, Inc. (EDC) for educational support services totaled $39.6 million. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. However, the contract type (Cost Plus Fixed Fee) can sometimes lead to higher costs if not managed tightly. 4. The lack of small business participation is noted, which could be a missed opportunity for economic inclusion.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type, while allowing flexibility, can be less cost-efficient than fixed-price contracts if not rigorously overseen. Benchmarking against similar educational support service contracts is needed to fully assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This process generally supports price discovery, but the specific cost outcomes depend on the rigor of the evaluation and negotiation.

Taxpayer Impact: While competition was present, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure warrants careful monitoring to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently and effectively for the intended educational outcomes.

Public Impact

Impacts educational development programs funded by USAID. Affects the beneficiaries of educational support services in the Philippines. Involves a significant financial commitment from the U.S. government. Raises questions about the efficiency of educational aid delivery.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the 'Educational Support Services' sector, often managed by agencies like USAID to implement development goals. Spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on program scope, location, and duration, but $39.6M represents a substantial investment.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates no small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the prime contractor, EDC, did not subcontract with small businesses for this award, potentially limiting opportunities for smaller entities in this significant contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would typically be managed by the Agency for International Development (USAID) through contract officers and technical monitors. The effectiveness of this oversight is crucial, especially with a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract, to ensure funds are used appropriately and objectives are met.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

educational-support-services, agency-for-international-development, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Agency for International Development awarded $39.6 million to EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF BASA PILIPINAS PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Agency for International Development (Agency for International Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-01-01. End: 2018-07-31.

What specific educational outcomes were achieved with the $39.6 million investment, and how do they compare to the program's initial objectives?

Assessing the value requires a detailed review of the program's performance metrics against its stated goals. Without specific outcome data, it's difficult to definitively state the return on investment. However, the contract's duration and cost suggest a significant scope, implying a substantial effort to achieve educational improvements.

Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate cost overruns and ensure the government received the best possible price?

Cost Plus Fixed Fee contracts necessitate robust oversight to control costs. Mechanisms typically include detailed cost reporting, regular audits, and strong negotiation by the contracting officer. The fixed fee provides an incentive for the contractor to manage costs efficiently, but the government bears the direct cost risk.

How effectively did the full and open competition process translate into competitive pricing and optimal contractor performance for this educational support project?

Full and open competition generally promotes competitive pricing by allowing a wide range of qualified bidders. However, the ultimate success in achieving optimal pricing and performance depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria, and the negotiation process. The contract's final cost and EDC's performance would provide the best indicators.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational ServicesEducational Support ServicesEducational Support Services

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAININGEDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: SOL-492-12-000019

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 43 FOUNDRY AVENUE, WALTHAM, MA, 02453

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,680,000

Exercised Options: $39,680,000

Current Obligation: $39,601,187

Actual Outlays: $100,000

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 13

Total Subaward Amount: $6,451,848

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2013-01-01

Current End Date: 2018-07-31

Potential End Date: 2018-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-05-18

More Contracts from Education Development Center, Inc.

View all Education Development Center, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Agency for International Development Contracts

View all Agency for International Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending