USDA's $12.7M BPA Call for Computer Peripherals Awarded to Government Acquisitions Inc. in FY06

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,680,687 ($12.7M)

Contractor: Government Acquisitions Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Agriculture

Start Date: 2006-09-28

End Date: 2007-09-30

Contract Duration: 367 days

Daily Burn Rate: $34.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Sector: IT

Official Description: FY 06 BPA CALL.

Place of Performance

Location: CINCINNATI, HAMILTON County, OHIO, 45202

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Agriculture obligated $12.7 million to GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS INC for work described as: FY 06 BPA CALL. Key points: 1. The contract was awarded for computer peripheral equipment, a common IT need. 2. Government Acquisitions Inc. secured the award, but specific market share is unknown. 3. The contract's duration and value suggest a moderate level of risk. 4. Spending in the IT sector is substantial, making this a typical procurement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12.7M over 367 days is substantial. Without specific unit pricing or comparison data, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money against similar contracts for peripheral equipment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This suggests some competition occurred, but the exclusion of certain sources may have limited the full competitive landscape and potentially impacted price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The $12.7M expenditure represents taxpayer funds used for essential IT equipment. The limited competition aspect warrants scrutiny to ensure the best possible price was achieved.

Public Impact

Federal agencies rely on such contracts for essential IT hardware. The award supports the operational needs of the Department of Agriculture. Procurement of computer peripherals is a recurring government expense. The specific equipment procured impacts agency productivity and efficiency.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Limited competition method
Lack of detailed pricing data for benchmarking
Awarded in FY06, older data may not reflect current market prices

Positive Signals

Awarded to support a specific agency need
Contract duration is defined

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically computer peripheral equipment. Government spending on IT hardware is a significant portion of the federal budget, with benchmarks varying widely based on equipment type and volume.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would involve reviewing the justification for excluding sources and ensuring the contract terms were met. The agency's Office of the Chief Financial Officer would likely be involved in financial oversight.

Related Government Programs

Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing
Department of Agriculture Contracting
Office of the Chief Financial Officer Programs

Risk Flags

Limited competition
Lack of detailed pricing data
Older contract data (FY06)
No small business participation indicated

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Agriculture awarded $12.7 million to GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS INC. FY 06 BPA CALL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Agriculture (Office of the Chief Financial Officer).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-09-28. End: 2007-09-30.

What was the specific justification for excluding sources in this full and open competition?

The justification for excluding sources is not provided in the data. Typically, such exclusions require a documented rationale, such as specific technical requirements, existing infrastructure compatibility, or unique capabilities. Understanding this reason is crucial for assessing the fairness and completeness of the competition.

How does the per-unit cost of the procured peripherals compare to market rates from the same period?

Without specific unit cost data and the exact types of peripherals purchased, a direct comparison to market rates from FY06 is not possible. Benchmarking would require detailed product specifications and pricing information from that era to assess if the government received competitive pricing.

What was the overall effectiveness of the procured computer peripherals in meeting the Department of Agriculture's needs?

The provided data does not contain information on the effectiveness or performance of the procured peripherals. Effectiveness would be assessed through user feedback, system performance metrics, and whether the equipment met the intended operational requirements of the Office of the Chief Financial Officer.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Computer and Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing › Other Computer Peripheral Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 231 W 4TH ST, CINCINNATI, OH, 45202

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: AG3142B060035

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline