Avanza LLC awarded $9.48M for administrative management consulting, with a significant portion allocated to Virginia

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,483,264 ($9.5M)

Contractor: Avanza LLC

Awarding Agency: Corporation for National and Community Service

Start Date: 2024-04-15

End Date: 2027-04-14

Contract Duration: 1,094 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: BUDGETARY OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22044

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Corporation for National and Community Service obligated $9.5 million to AVANZA LLC for work described as: BUDGETARY OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value of $9.48M for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Services are categorized under NAICS code 541611, indicating a focus on management consulting. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Avanza LLC, the contractor, will provide support to the Corporation for National and Community Service. 5. The contract duration is 1094 days, spanning from April 15, 2024, to April 14, 2027. 6. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which sets a ceiling on the total cost. 7. The award was made as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $9.48M for administrative management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services provided to federal agencies of this size would offer further insight into value for money. The Firm Fixed Price structure helps control costs, but the specific deliverables and their associated costs would be key to a definitive value assessment. The contract's alignment with the Corporation for National and Community Service's mission needs to be considered in the overall value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The fact that it was competed suggests that multiple companies likely vied for this opportunity. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government, as contractors are incentivized to offer competitive pricing and innovative solutions to win the award.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and a wider range of qualified service providers. This process helps ensure that government funds are used efficiently by fostering a market-driven approach to service acquisition.

Public Impact

The Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) will benefit from enhanced administrative operations and management consulting support. Services delivered will likely improve the efficiency and effectiveness of CNCS programs and initiatives. The geographic impact is primarily focused on Virginia, where the contractor is located and services may be delivered. The contract supports the administrative functions of a federal agency, indirectly impacting the workforce involved in national and community service programs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if deliverables are not clearly defined within the Firm Fixed Price structure.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical administrative support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
The specific impact on small businesses is not detailed, as this contract was not set aside for small businesses.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
Contract duration of nearly three years allows for sustained support and potential for relationship building.
Contractor Avanza LLC has secured this award, indicating they meet the government's requirements.

Sector Analysis

The administrative management and general management consulting services sector is a significant part of the federal procurement landscape, supporting various government functions. This contract falls within the professional services category, which is characterized by a wide range of specialized expertise. Spending in this sector is often driven by the need for efficiency improvements, strategic planning, and operational support within federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other contracts for similar consulting services awarded to agencies of the CNCS's size and scope.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Therefore, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless Avanza LLC voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist and are being utilized.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program officials within the Corporation for National and Community Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the Firm Fixed Price contract type, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon budget. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases where contract awards are reported. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Support Services
Management and Consulting Services
Federal Agency Operations Support
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues if contractor capabilities are overestimated.
Risk of cost overruns if scope is not tightly managed, despite FFP.
Lack of specific small business subcontracting requirements noted.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Corporation for National and Community Service awarded $9.5 million to AVANZA LLC. BUDGETARY OPERATIONS SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AVANZA LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Corporation for National and Community Service (Corporation for National and Community Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-04-15. End: 2027-04-14.

What is Avanza LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly in administrative management consulting?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that Avanza LLC has a history of receiving federal contracts. While specific details on their performance across all contracts require deeper analysis, their ability to secure this $9.48M award suggests they have met the necessary qualifications and demonstrated capability. Further investigation into past performance reviews, contract modifications, and any reported issues on previous federal engagements would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record in administrative management and general management consulting services. It is important to assess if their past performance aligns with the requirements and expectations for this current contract with the Corporation for National and Community Service.

How does the $9.48M contract value compare to similar administrative management consulting contracts awarded by the federal government?

The $9.48M contract value for administrative management and general management consulting services is a substantial award. To benchmark its value effectively, it should be compared against contracts of similar scope, duration, and complexity awarded to other federal agencies. Factors such as the specific services required, the level of expertise needed, and the geographic location of service delivery influence pricing. A comprehensive comparison would involve analyzing the per-unit costs, if applicable, or the overall cost per year for similar consulting engagements. Without specific comparable data points, it is challenging to definitively state whether this contract represents excellent, good, or fair value, but its size suggests a significant operational support requirement.

What are the primary risks associated with this Firm Fixed Price contract for administrative support?

The primary risks associated with this Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for administrative support revolve around potential scope creep and contractor performance. While FFP contracts offer cost certainty, they can incentivize contractors to cut corners if not properly managed, potentially impacting service quality. Conversely, if the scope of work is not precisely defined, the government might face challenges in ensuring all necessary tasks are completed without additional cost. Another risk is the contractor's ability to maintain consistent performance over the nearly three-year duration. Any disruption in service or failure to meet performance standards could impact the Corporation for National and Community Service's operations. Robust oversight and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks.

How effective is full and open competition in ensuring competitive pricing for administrative consulting services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing for administrative consulting services. By allowing all responsible sources to submit proposals, the government maximizes the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive offers. This process encourages contractors to submit their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. The presence of multiple bidders creates a market dynamic where price is a significant factor, pushing down costs and potentially leading to better value for the taxpayer. While other factors like technical merit and past performance are also considered, the competitive pressure inherent in full and open competition is a key driver of favorable pricing.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the Corporation for National and Community Service?

Analyzing the historical spending patterns of the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS) for administrative management and general management consulting services is crucial for context. Understanding how much CNCS has spent on similar services in previous years, the types of contracts awarded (e.g., FFP, T&M), and the contractors they have engaged can reveal trends and potential areas for cost savings or efficiency gains. For instance, a significant increase in spending on consulting services might warrant further investigation into the necessity and effectiveness of these expenditures. Conversely, consistent or decreasing spending could indicate stable operational needs or successful cost management. This contract's $9.48M value should be viewed against this historical backdrop to assess its proportionality and justification.

What are the implications of this contract being awarded as a Delivery Order?

The fact that this contract was awarded as a Delivery Order (DO) implies it is a task order issued under a pre-existing indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar contract vehicle. This means that the underlying contract vehicle itself likely went through a competitive process, and this DO represents a specific order for services placed against that established agreement. The implications are that the terms, conditions, and potentially pricing structures were established when the parent contract was awarded. This method can streamline the acquisition process for specific needs, but it also means that the competition for this particular $9.48M award might have been limited to the awardees of the parent IDIQ contract, rather than a completely open competition for this specific task.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6201 SQUIRES HILL DR, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22044

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,483,264

Exercised Options: $9,483,264

Current Obligation: $9,483,264

Actual Outlays: $5,905,874

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA19D00B0

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline