DoD's $16.7M Chilled Meats Contract with Tyson Foods Raises Questions on Competition and Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,774,813 ($16.8M)

Contractor: Tyson Foods Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-07-01

End Date: 2009-09-30

Contract Duration: 91 days

Daily Burn Rate: $184.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RESALE - CHILLED MEATS

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGDALE, WASHINGTON County, ARKANSAS, 72762

State: Arkansas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.8 million to TYSON FOODS INC. for work described as: RESALE - CHILLED MEATS Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Tyson Foods Inc. for chilled meats represents a significant expenditure. 2. Lack of competition is a major concern, potentially leading to inflated prices. 3. The firm fixed price contract offers some cost certainty but may not reflect market best prices. 4. Analysis of the sector suggests potential for greater competition and cost savings.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $16.7M for a 91-day period is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar bulk meat purchases by other agencies or private entities.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not available for competition, indicating a sole-source or limited source award. This significantly restricts price discovery and may prevent the government from securing the most favorable terms.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely results in higher costs for taxpayers, as market pressures that drive down prices are absent.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential food supplies due to a lack of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense's reliance on a single vendor for critical food items raises supply chain vulnerability concerns. Transparency in government procurement processes is crucial for public trust and efficient use of funds.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls under general line grocery merchant wholesalers, a sector where competitive bidding is typically robust. The value is significant for a short-term delivery order, suggesting substantial volume.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or considerations for small business participation in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The limited competition and lack of transparency raise concerns about the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms in ensuring the best value for taxpayer dollars.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

general-line-grocery-merchant-wholesaler, department-of-defense, ar, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.8 million to TYSON FOODS INC.. RESALE - CHILLED MEATS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TYSON FOODS INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Commissary Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-07-01. End: 2009-09-30.

What was the justification for not competing this contract, and what steps were taken to ensure a fair and reasonable price was negotiated?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION.' Without further documentation, the specific justification remains unclear. Agencies typically cite reasons like urgency, lack of available sources, or unique capabilities. However, for a commodity like chilled meats, a lack of competition is unusual and warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing was achieved through negotiation or benchmark analysis.

How does the per-unit cost of these chilled meats compare to market rates or other government contracts for similar products?

The data does not provide per-unit cost information, making a direct comparison difficult. The total contract value of $16.7M over 91 days suggests a significant volume. Benchmarking against industry prices for bulk chilled meats or other DoD commissary contracts would be necessary to assess cost-effectiveness. The absence of competition makes this benchmark analysis even more critical.

What is the potential impact on food supply chain resilience if a single vendor like Tyson Foods is relied upon for such a large volume of chilled meats?

Relying on a single vendor for a substantial portion of chilled meat supply can create supply chain vulnerabilities. Disruptions at Tyson Foods, whether due to operational issues, natural disasters, or labor disputes, could significantly impact the Department of Defense's ability to procure these essential items. Diversifying suppliers, even within limited competition scenarios, can enhance overall resilience.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Wholesale TradeGrocery and Related Product Merchant WholesalersGeneral Line Grocery Merchant Wholesalers

Product/Service Code: SUBSISTENCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2210 W OAKLAWN DR, SPRINGDALE, AR, 72762

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,774,813

Exercised Options: $16,774,813

Current Obligation: $16,774,813

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HDEC0105G3222

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-07-01

Current End Date: 2009-09-30

Potential End Date: 2009-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2019-06-07

More Contracts from Tyson Foods Inc.

View all Tyson Foods Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending