Department of Energy awards $1.6M for IT policy and strategy support to Autonomic Integra LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $1,603,100 ($1.6M)
Contractor: Autonomic Integra LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2025-09-03
End Date: 2026-09-02
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: IT
Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) ORDER ISSUED UNDER POLICY, STRATEGY, AND GOVERNANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (PSGSS) 2.0 BPA # 89303025AIM000022 ESTABLISHED UNDER GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (MAS) CONTRACT 47QTCA21D00BH FOR
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $1.6 million to AUTONOMIC INTEGRA LLC for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) ORDER ISSUED UNDER POLICY, STRATEGY, AND GOVERNANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (PSGSS) 2.0 BPA # 89303025AIM000022 ESTABLISHED UNDER GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (MAS) CONTRACT 47QTCA21D00BH FOR Key points: 1. Contract focuses on IT policy, strategy, and governance, aligning with federal digital modernization goals. 2. Awarded under a GSA MAS BPA, suggesting a streamlined procurement process for IT services. 3. The contract duration of one year with a time-and-materials pricing model allows for flexibility. 4. Autonomic Integra LLC is the sole awardee for this specific BPA call. 5. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, indicating a focus on specialized capabilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $1.6 million for one year of IT policy and strategy support appears within a reasonable range for specialized federal IT services. Benchmarking against similar GSA MAS contracts for policy and strategy consulting would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The time-and-materials pricing model, while flexible, requires careful monitoring to ensure costs remain aligned with the scope of work and do not escalate unexpectedly.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This BPA call was issued under a full and open competition BPA (PSGSS 2.0). While the initial BPA was competed broadly, this specific call was awarded to a single vendor, Autonomic Integra LLC. The level of competition for the underlying BPA is a positive indicator, but the specifics of how this particular call was evaluated and why only one vendor was selected are not detailed here. Further information on the evaluation criteria and any competitive range would be beneficial.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition for the BPA suggests that taxpayers benefit from a broad market solicitation, potentially leading to competitive pricing and a wider pool of qualified vendors. However, the single award for this specific call warrants scrutiny to ensure the best value was achieved.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy benefits from expert support in shaping its IT policies and strategies. Services delivered will contribute to the effective governance and modernization of the agency's IT infrastructure. The contract's impact is primarily national, focusing on federal IT policy development. Workforce implications are likely to involve specialized IT policy analysts and strategists, potentially augmenting existing government staff.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics for this specific BPA call.
- Potential for cost overruns with time-and-materials contract if not closely managed.
- Limited transparency on the specific evaluation process for this individual call under the BPA.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under a GSA MAS BPA, indicating adherence to established procurement standards.
- Contract supports critical IT policy and strategy functions for a major federal agency.
- One-year duration allows for reassessment and potential re-competition.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Information Technology sector, specifically focusing on IT policy, strategy, and governance. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies increasingly relying on external expertise for complex policy development and strategic planning. This contract aligns with broader government initiatives like the Federal Data Strategy and IT modernization efforts, where effective policy frameworks are crucial for efficient and secure technology adoption.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing specialized expertise, and the procurement process did not prioritize small business participation for this particular award. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore minimal for this specific contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. As a BPA call under a GSA MAS contract, it benefits from the initial GSA oversight of the parent BPA. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, but detailed performance reporting and specific oversight mechanisms for this call would require further inquiry.
Related Government Programs
- GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS)
- Policy, Strategy, and Governance Support Services (PSGSS) 2.0 BPA
- Federal IT Policy Development
- IT Strategy Consulting
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to T&M pricing model.
- Limited visibility into specific performance metrics for this BPA call.
- Sole awardee for this specific call under a broader BPA.
Tags
it-services, policy-support, strategy-consulting, department-of-energy, gsa-mas, blanket-purchase-agreement, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, district-of-columbia, computer-systems-design-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $1.6 million to AUTONOMIC INTEGRA LLC. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) ORDER ISSUED UNDER POLICY, STRATEGY, AND GOVERNANCE SUPPORT SERVICES (PSGSS) 2.0 BPA # 89303025AIM000022 ESTABLISHED UNDER GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (GSA) MULTIPLE AWARD SCHEDULE (MAS) CONTRACT 47QTCA21D00BH FOR
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AUTONOMIC INTEGRA LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $1.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-03. End: 2026-09-02.
What is the track record of Autonomic Integra LLC in delivering similar IT policy and strategy support services to federal agencies?
Autonomic Integra LLC has a history of providing IT consulting and support services to various federal agencies. Their experience often includes areas such as IT strategy, enterprise architecture, cybersecurity policy, and program management. To assess their track record for this specific contract, a review of past performance evaluations, contract awards, and client testimonials related to policy and strategy development would be necessary. Examining their success in similar engagements, particularly those involving complex federal IT environments and policy formulation, is crucial for understanding their capability to meet the Department of Energy's needs effectively. Information on their past performance on time-and-materials contracts would also be relevant.
How does the awarded amount of $1.6 million for one year of service compare to market rates for similar IT policy and strategy support?
The awarded amount of $1.6 million for one year of IT policy and strategy support is a significant investment. To benchmark this value, one would typically compare it against similar contracts awarded by other federal agencies or within the private sector for comparable services. Factors influencing market rates include the complexity of the policy areas, the level of expertise required, the geographic location of the support, and the specific deliverables. Given this is a time-and-materials contract, the actual cost will depend on the hours worked and the rates negotiated. A detailed analysis would involve examining the labor categories and their associated rates against GSA Schedule pricing and industry benchmarks for senior IT policy and strategy consultants.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate the success of this contract?
Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this BPA call are not detailed in the provided data. However, for IT policy and strategy support contracts, typical KPIs often revolve around the timely delivery of policy documents, strategic plans, and governance frameworks that meet defined requirements. Other metrics might include the quality and clarity of recommendations, the successful implementation of proposed strategies, adherence to budget and schedule for specific project milestones, and stakeholder satisfaction. The effectiveness of the contractor in facilitating inter-agency collaboration on policy matters and contributing to the agency's overall IT modernization goals would also be critical evaluation points. The Department of Energy's contracting officer and program managers would establish and monitor these KPIs.
What is the historical spending pattern for IT policy and strategy support services at the Department of Energy?
Historical spending patterns for IT policy and strategy support services at the Department of Energy (DOE) can be analyzed by examining previous contract awards for similar services. This would involve looking at contracts awarded over the past several fiscal years, identifying the agencies or offices within DOE that procured these services, the types of contracts used (e.g., BPA calls, task orders, standalone contracts), the contractors involved, and the total amounts obligated. Understanding these patterns can reveal trends in agency needs, preferred procurement methods, and the typical scale of such engagements. For instance, a consistent pattern of awarding multi-million dollar contracts for policy and strategy support might indicate a sustained need for external expertise in these areas.
What are the potential risks associated with a time-and-materials contract for policy and strategy services?
Time-and-materials (T&M) contracts, while offering flexibility, carry inherent risks, particularly for policy and strategy services. A primary risk is the potential for cost escalation if the scope of work is not clearly defined or if project duration extends beyond initial estimates. Without fixed deliverables tied to specific prices, there's a risk that contractor effort could exceed expectations, leading to higher-than-anticipated costs for the government. Effective oversight, including detailed tracking of labor hours, rigorous review of invoices, and clear communication regarding project scope and progress, is essential to mitigate these risks. The absence of a ceiling price on T&M contracts necessitates vigilant management to ensure value for money.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 101 LAKEFOREST BLVD, STE 375, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20877
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $8,462,412
Exercised Options: $1,605,228
Current Obligation: $1,603,100
Actual Outlays: $471,775
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89303025AIM000022
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-03
Current End Date: 2026-09-02
Potential End Date: 2030-09-02 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Autonomic Integra LLC
- THE Purpose of This Contract IS to Acquire Scientific Support and Related Services for the Giss Facility in NEW York City, NY — $13.3M (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- IS&P Privacy Support — $6.0M (Department of Transportation)
- Privacy Management and Compliance Support Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Order for the Office of the Chief Information Officer (ocio) Privacy Management and Compliance Office (IM-42) — $2.5M (Department of Energy)
- Efast PA 25-010-C8, "application Support Services of the Radio Coverage Analysis System (rcas) for Spectrum Engineering Services Organization (AJW-19)" — $865.4K (Department of Transportation)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)