DOE's $3.8M Public Relations Contract Awarded to Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc. for Water Power Technologies
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $3,817,287 ($3.8M)
Contractor: Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2023-12-01
End Date: 2026-12-15
Contract Duration: 1,110 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE), STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH SUPPORT SERVICES (SEOSS) FOR WATER POWER TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE (WPTO)
Place of Performance
Location: PITTSBURGH, ALLEGHENY County, PENNSYLVANIA, 15203
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $3.8 million to RACK-WILDNER & REESE, INC. for work described as: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE), STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH SUPPORT SERVICES (SEOSS) FOR WATER POWER TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE (WPTO) Key points: 1. Contract aims to enhance strategic engagement and outreach for the Water Power Technologies Office. 2. Focus on public relations and strategic communication services for a key renewable energy sector. 3. Awarded under a Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a streamlined procurement process. 4. Contract duration extends over three years, suggesting a need for sustained support. 5. The Time and Materials pricing structure requires careful monitoring of labor hours and rates. 6. Small business participation is not explicitly mandated, warranting further investigation into subcontracting opportunities.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $3.8 million over approximately three years for public relations support appears within a reasonable range for specialized government outreach. However, without specific benchmarks for similar Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) outreach efforts or detailed task breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing model necessitates diligent oversight to ensure costs remain aligned with the scope of work and market rates for public relations services. Comparing this to other agency-wide public relations contracts could provide a more robust benchmark.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was competed under a Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call, which typically implies a competitive process among pre-qualified vendors. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, the use of a BPA Call suggests that multiple firms likely had the opportunity to bid. This level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive offers. The BPA mechanism itself is designed to facilitate efficient procurement while maintaining a degree of competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the BPA Call process is beneficial for taxpayers, as it helps to drive down costs through market forces and encourages vendors to offer their best pricing and services to secure the award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Department of Energy's Water Power Technologies Office, which will receive enhanced communication and engagement support. The contract will facilitate the dissemination of information regarding advancements in water power technologies, potentially increasing public awareness and support for renewable energy. Geographic impact is national, as the WPTO's mission and the technologies it supports have broad implications for U.S. energy independence and environmental goals. Workforce implications are primarily related to the contractor's personnel, but increased public understanding could indirectly support the growth of the water power sector workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual labor hours and costs incurred.
- Lack of specific details on the number of bidders or the evaluation criteria used in the BPA Call process limits a full assessment of the competitive landscape.
- The absence of explicit small business set-aside requirements raises questions about opportunities for smaller firms to participate in this contract.
Positive Signals
- The contract was competed under a Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call, suggesting a structured and potentially efficient procurement process.
- The award to Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc. indicates a selection based on qualifications and potentially competitive pricing within the BPA framework.
- The contract duration of over three years suggests a stable and predictable need for these services, allowing for strategic planning and execution by the contractor.
Sector Analysis
The public relations and strategic communications sector is vital for government agencies to effectively convey their missions, research findings, and policy initiatives. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry, specifically focusing on advertising and public relations. The market for government public relations services is competitive, with numerous firms vying for contracts across various agencies. The Department of Energy, particularly its renewable energy offices, relies on such services to build public trust, disseminate research, and garner support for its technological advancements.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by 'ss': false. While the BPA Call mechanism might allow for subcontracting opportunities, the primary awardee is not a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if specific subcontracting goals were established or if small businesses are expected to participate in fulfilling the contract requirements. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore neutral to potentially limited unless subcontracting is actively pursued.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers within the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE). The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure necessitates rigorous monitoring of labor hours, rates, and direct costs to ensure compliance and prevent overspending. Transparency will depend on the agency's reporting practices for BPA calls and task orders. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Public Relations Contracts
- Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Support Services
- Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) Outreach Programs
- Federal Strategic Engagement and Outreach Contracts
- Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing structure.
- Limited transparency on the specific competitive process within the BPA Call.
- Lack of explicit small business participation requirements.
Tags
department-of-energy, eere, wpto, public-relations, strategic-outreach, time-and-materials, competed, bpa-call, professional-services, pennsylvania, federal-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $3.8 million to RACK-WILDNER & REESE, INC.. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY (DOE), OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND RENEWABLE ENERGY (EERE), STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT AND OUTREACH SUPPORT SERVICES (SEOSS) FOR WATER POWER TECHNOLOGIES OFFICE (WPTO)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RACK-WILDNER & REESE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $3.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-12-01. End: 2026-12-15.
What is the track record of Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc. in performing similar federal public relations contracts?
Information regarding Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc.'s specific track record with federal public relations contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing their past performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), previous federal awards, and client testimonials. Understanding their experience with energy-related agencies or similar scientific/technical outreach programs would be particularly relevant. Without this data, it's difficult to definitively assess their capability and past success in fulfilling government requirements for strategic engagement and outreach services.
How does the awarded amount of $3.8 million compare to similar public relations contracts for federal energy agencies?
The $3.8 million contract value for strategic engagement and outreach support services for the Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Public relations and strategic communication services for federal agencies can vary significantly based on scope, duration, and specific deliverables. Contracts for large-scale public awareness campaigns, crisis communications, or extensive stakeholder engagement might command higher values. Conversely, smaller, more focused outreach efforts would be less expensive. To assess value, this contract should be compared to other DOE or similar energy-focused agency contracts for similar services, considering factors like the number of personnel, duration, and specific communication channels utilized.
What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for public relations services?
The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for public relations services is the potential for cost overruns if not meticulously managed. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for actual labor hours and material costs incurred. This can lead to increased expenditures if tasks take longer than anticipated, if labor rates are higher than expected, or if scope creep occurs without adequate controls. For public relations, defining and controlling the 'time' spent on activities like strategy development, content creation, media relations, and event management can be challenging, making robust oversight crucial to ensure efficiency and prevent unnecessary costs for the government.
How effective is the Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call mechanism in ensuring competitive pricing for public relations services?
The Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call mechanism is designed to streamline the procurement process for commonly purchased goods and services while maintaining a degree of competition. For public relations services, a BPA Call typically involves pre-qualified vendors who have already undergone an initial vetting process. When a specific need arises, an "order" or "call" is issued against the BPA, allowing these qualified vendors to compete. This approach can lead to competitive pricing because multiple vendors are invited to submit proposals for each specific task order. However, the overall competitiveness can depend on the number of vendors on the BPA, the clarity of the task order requirements, and the evaluation criteria used for selecting the winning bid among the BPA holders.
What is the historical spending pattern for public relations and outreach support within the Water Power Technologies Office?
Historical spending patterns for public relations and outreach support within the Water Power Technologies Office (WPTO) are not provided in the current data. To establish such a pattern, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded by WPTO or its parent organizations (like EERE or DOE) for similar services. This analysis would involve identifying the total amount spent on these services over several fiscal years, the types of contracts used (e.g., T&M, fixed-price), the primary contractors, and the duration and scope of those contracts. Understanding historical spending can help contextualize the current $3.8 million award, identify trends, and assess whether current spending aligns with past investment levels or represents a significant shift.
What are the potential implications of this contract on the advancement of water power technologies?
This contract's primary implication for the advancement of water power technologies lies in its focus on strategic engagement and outreach. By enhancing communication efforts, the contract aims to increase public awareness, foster stakeholder support, and potentially attract further investment and talent to the water power sector. Effective public relations can help translate complex technological developments into understandable benefits for the public and policymakers, thereby building a stronger foundation for research, development, and deployment initiatives. Improved outreach can also facilitate knowledge sharing among researchers, industry partners, and international collaborators, accelerating innovation and the adoption of new water power solutions.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Advertising, Public Relations, and Related Services › Public Relations Agencies
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Solicitation ID: 89243423QEE000092
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2325 E CARSON ST FL 2, PITTSBURGH, PA, 15203
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $4,805,389
Exercised Options: $4,805,389
Current Obligation: $3,817,287
Actual Outlays: $3,464,561
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 89243423AEE000009
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-12-01
Current End Date: 2026-12-15
Potential End Date: 2026-12-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-02
More Contracts from Rack-Wildner & Reese, Inc.
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (eere) Office of the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary (pdas), Strategic Engagement and Outreach Support Services — $6.9M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (eere), Strategic Engagement and Outreach Support Services (seoss) for Building Technologies Office (BTO) — $4.6M (Department of Energy)
- Order for the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation (cmei), Strategic Engagement and Outreach Support Services (seoss), Office of Electricity — $2.4M (Department of Energy)
- Order for the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Critical Minerals and Energy Innovation (cmei), Strategic Engagement and Outreach Support Services (seoss), Office of the Under Secretary for Science — $1.9M (Department of Energy)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Eere, Strategic Engagement and Outreach Support Services (seoss) for Geothermal Technologies Office (GTO) — $1.5M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)