Wyandotte Technologies awarded $2M for technical services, with 6 bidders competing
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,028,045 ($2.0M)
Contractor: Wyandotte Technologies
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2021-05-01
End Date: 2026-04-30
Contract Duration: 1,825 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: OAK RIDGE, ANDERSON County, TENNESSEE, 37830
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $2.0 million to WYANDOTTE TECHNOLOGIES for work described as: TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 3. The duration of 1825 days suggests a long-term need for these technical services. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541690 points to specialized consulting services. 5. The award was made by the Department of Energy, suggesting a focus on energy-related technical support. 6. The contractor, Wyandotte Technologies, has secured this award in Tennessee.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total contract value of approximately $2 million over five years averages to about $400,000 annually. Without specific performance metrics or a detailed breakdown of services, it is difficult to benchmark the value for money definitively. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has negotiated a set price for the defined scope of work, which can be advantageous if the contractor manages costs effectively. Further analysis would require comparing the scope of services to similar contracts awarded to other firms.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and multiple bids were considered. The presence of six bidders suggests a reasonable level of competition for this requirement. A higher number of bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of technical solutions.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award is beneficial for taxpayers, as it likely resulted in a more favorable price than a sole-source or limited competition contract. The six bids indicate that taxpayer funds are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy benefits from specialized technical services to support its operations. The contract supports technical consulting services, likely contributing to energy research, development, or operational efficiency. The geographic impact is centered in Tennessee, where Wyandotte Technologies is based and likely where services will be performed. The contract may have implications for the technical workforce, potentially creating or sustaining jobs within Wyandotte Technologies.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of detailed performance metrics makes it hard to assess the true value and effectiveness of the services provided.
- The firm fixed-price contract could lead to cost overruns if the contractor's estimates are inaccurate or unforeseen issues arise.
- The specific nature of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' is broad and requires further definition to understand the precise deliverables.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust and fair bidding process.
- The firm fixed-price contract structure transfers cost risk to the contractor.
- The contract duration of five years indicates a stable, long-term need for the services, suggesting a well-defined requirement.
Sector Analysis
The contract falls under the 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' sector, a broad category encompassing specialized expertise. This sector is crucial for government agencies like the Department of Energy, which rely on external knowledge for complex projects and research. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized skills. Benchmarking spending in this area requires comparing the contract's scope and value against similar consulting engagements within the federal government and private sector.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus was on full and open competition. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Wyandotte Technologies, as the prime contractor, chooses to engage small businesses for subcontracting opportunities.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of Energy. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance reports may not always be publicly accessible. The Inspector General for the Department of Energy would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Energy Research and Development Contracts
- Federal Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
- Energy Sector Support Contracts
- Definitive Contracts
- Firm Fixed Price Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to fixed-price nature if estimates are inaccurate.
- Risk of scope creep if 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' are not clearly defined.
- Limited visibility into contractor's past performance without further data.
- Uncertainty regarding small business subcontracting opportunities.
Tags
department-of-energy, technical-services, consulting-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, wyandotte-technologies, tennessee, naics-541690, definitive-contract, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $2.0 million to WYANDOTTE TECHNOLOGIES. TECHNICAL SERVICES SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is WYANDOTTE TECHNOLOGIES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-05-01. End: 2026-04-30.
What is the track record of Wyandotte Technologies with the Department of Energy and other federal agencies?
Information regarding Wyandotte Technologies' specific track record with the Department of Energy and other federal agencies is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require accessing federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) to review past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes. Understanding their past performance is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute this current contract and for evaluating the overall risk associated with awarding them this $2 million agreement over five years.
How does the $2 million contract value compare to similar technical services contracts awarded by the Department of Energy?
The $2 million contract value for technical services over five years, averaging $400,000 annually, needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Without specific details on the scope of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services,' direct comparison is challenging. However, the Department of Energy frequently awards contracts for technical support, research, and consulting. A review of recent awards for similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541690) and contract types (Firm Fixed Price) within the DOE would reveal if this value is within the typical range. Factors like contract duration, complexity of services, and geographic location also influence pricing, making a precise comparison difficult without more granular data.
What are the primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price contract for technical services?
The primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price contract lie in potential cost overruns for the contractor if their initial estimates are inaccurate or if unforeseen technical challenges arise during the contract's five-year term. For the government, the risk is that the fixed price might not represent the best value if the contractor underperforms or if the scope of work needs significant adjustments, which could lead to change orders. Additionally, the broad nature of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' introduces a risk of scope creep or misinterpretation of deliverables if not clearly defined and managed throughout the contract lifecycle.
How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method in ensuring competitive pricing for technical services?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is generally effective in ensuring competitive pricing, especially when multiple bidders participate. By broadly advertising the requirement and allowing any qualified source to submit an offer, the government leverages market forces to drive down prices and encourage innovation. The fact that six bidders submitted proposals for this contract suggests a healthy level of competition. This approach typically yields better value for taxpayers compared to limited or sole-source procurements, as it forces contractors to offer their most competitive terms to win the award.
What is the historical spending trend for 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' by the Department of Energy?
Analyzing historical spending trends for 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' (NAICS 541690) by the Department of Energy (DOE) would provide context for this $2 million award. While specific historical data isn't provided, the DOE, like many large federal agencies, relies on external expertise for a wide range of scientific and technical challenges. Spending in this category can fluctuate based on agency priorities, research initiatives, and budget allocations. A trend analysis would involve examining annual spending on this NAICS code over several fiscal years to identify patterns, significant increases or decreases, and the average contract values awarded.
What are the potential implications of this contract on the small business ecosystem, given it's not a small business set-aside?
Since this contract was not set aside for small businesses and Wyandotte Technologies is not identified as a small business, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is limited unless subcontracting occurs. The primary benefit to small businesses would arise if Wyandotte Technologies actively seeks to subcontract portions of this work to qualified small business firms. Without explicit subcontracting goals or reporting requirements detailed in the award, it's uncertain how much of this $2 million will flow down to the small business sector. Agencies often encourage prime contractors to utilize small businesses, but the extent of this utilization varies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: 89243119RSC000025
Offers Received: 6
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 15 TURTLE DR, WYANDOTTE, OK, 74370
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,499,786
Exercised Options: $17,499,786
Current Obligation: $2,028,045
Actual Outlays: $1,729,332
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-05-01
Current End Date: 2026-04-30
Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-30
More Contracts from Wyandotte Technologies
- Support Service Contract — $24.5M (Department of Energy)
- Application Development, Modernization, and Enhancement Support — $6.8M (Department of Agriculture)
- THE Western Area Power Administration (wapa), Sierra Nevada Region (SNR) Requires Non-Personal Technical Support Services to Support Functional Areas of Mission Support, Facility and Property Management, Environmental Management, Power System Operati — $3.7M (Department of Energy)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)