DOE awards $7M for Microsoft Unified Support, with Minburn Technology Group as prime
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $7,038,292 ($7.0M)
Contractor: Minburn Technology Group, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Energy
Start Date: 2025-06-26
End Date: 2026-06-25
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.3K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: MICROSOFT UNIFIED SUPPORT
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20585
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Energy obligated $7.0 million to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC for work described as: MICROSOFT UNIFIED SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value of $7.04M for one year of support. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Potential for future task orders and contract modifications. 4. Service category is 'Other Computer Related Services'. 5. Contract duration is one year, with a potential for extensions. 6. Prime contractor is Minburn Technology Group, LLC.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $7.04 million for one year of Microsoft Unified Support appears to be within a reasonable range for enterprise-level software support. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government contracts for comprehensive IT support services would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the scope of support (e.g., number of users, specific Microsoft products covered, response times), a precise value assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a defined cost for the services.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was open, specific sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation. The presence of 'full and open' suggests multiple bidders were likely considered. The specific exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to understand its impact on the competitive landscape and potential price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to better pricing and service offerings. The exclusion of sources, however, could potentially limit the number of competitive bids received, which might affect the ultimate cost savings for taxpayers.
Public Impact
The Department of Energy (DOE) will benefit from enhanced support for its Microsoft software environment. This contract ensures continued access to technical support, updates, and potentially proactive services for critical Microsoft products. The services delivered will support the operational continuity of DOE's IT infrastructure. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the DOE headquarters is located, but may extend to other DOE facilities nationwide.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- The 'Exclusion of Sources' clause in the competition type requires further clarification to ensure maximum taxpayer value.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of past support.
- The firm-fixed-price nature might lead to scope creep if not managed carefully, potentially increasing overall costs beyond the initial award.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- The contract duration of one year allows for periodic reassessment of needs and contractor performance.
Sector Analysis
The IT services sector, particularly enterprise software support, is a significant area of government spending. This contract falls under the broader category of computer-related services, which includes a wide range of IT support functions. The market for unified support for major software vendors like Microsoft is substantial, with numerous providers competing for these lucrative contracts. Government spending in this area is often driven by the need to maintain complex IT infrastructures and ensure the smooth operation of critical systems.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a primary set-aside consideration for this specific contract. This suggests that the prime contractor, Minburn Technology Group, LLC, is not a small business, and there is no explicit requirement for small business subcontracting in the data. The impact on the small business ecosystem would depend on whether Minburn Technology Group engages small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed here.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of Energy's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement and delivery terms. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Microsoft Enterprise Agreement Support
- IT Infrastructure Support Services
- Software Licensing and Maintenance Contracts
- Cloud Services Support
Risk Flags
- Competition Type: 'Exclusion of Sources' warrants further investigation.
- Scope Definition: Lack of detailed scope in provided data.
- Performance Metrics: No performance metrics provided for evaluation.
Tags
it-services, software-support, microsoft, department-of-energy, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, district-of-columbia, computer-related-services, enterprise-it
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Energy awarded $7.0 million to MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC. MICROSOFT UNIFIED SUPPORT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MINBURN TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Energy (Department of Energy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-06-26. End: 2026-06-25.
What is the specific scope of 'Microsoft Unified Support' covered under this contract?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of 'Microsoft Unified Support.' Typically, this type of support contract with Microsoft or its authorized partners covers a comprehensive range of services including technical support for various Microsoft products (e.g., Windows, Office 365, Azure, server products), access to expert resources, proactive services, and potentially training. The exact services, products, and service level agreements (SLAs) would be defined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW), which is not available in the provided data. Understanding the precise scope is crucial for evaluating the value and necessity of the $7.04 million award.
How does the $7.04 million contract value compare to similar Microsoft Unified Support contracts awarded by other federal agencies?
Benchmarking the $7.04 million contract value requires access to comparable contract data. Without specific details on the scope, duration, and service levels, direct comparisons are difficult. However, large federal agencies often spend millions annually on comprehensive Microsoft support. For instance, contracts for similar unified support can range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars depending on the agency's size, user base, and the breadth of Microsoft products utilized. A detailed analysis would involve comparing the per-user cost, per-product cost, and included service levels against other agency awards for similar support packages to determine if this award represents good value for money.
What specific 'sources' were excluded in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type, and why?
The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that while the solicitation was broadly advertised, certain potential sources were intentionally excluded from consideration prior to or during the solicitation process. The specific reasons for exclusion are not provided in the data. Common reasons for excluding sources can include prior performance issues, failure to meet specific technical qualifications, or in some cases, a determination that a limited number of sources can meet unique requirements. Understanding the rationale behind the exclusion is important for assessing whether the competition was truly as open as possible and if taxpayer value was potentially compromised by limiting the bidder pool.
What is the track record of Minburn Technology Group, LLC in providing similar IT support services to the federal government?
Information on Minburn Technology Group, LLC's specific track record for providing Microsoft Unified Support or similar large-scale IT services to the federal government is not detailed in the provided data. As a prime contractor, their past performance on previous contracts, including adherence to schedules, quality of service, and customer satisfaction, would be a key factor in the Department of Energy's decision-making process. A thorough assessment would involve reviewing their contract history, past performance evaluations (if publicly available), and any reported issues or successes on prior government engagements.
What are the potential risks associated with a one-year firm-fixed-price contract for unified support?
A primary risk with a one-year firm-fixed-price contract for unified support is the potential for the government to overpay if the scope of services is not precisely defined or if the contractor's costs are lower than anticipated. Conversely, the contractor might under-deliver on services if the scope is too narrowly defined, leading to gaps in support. Another risk is scope creep, where the government requests services beyond the original agreement, potentially leading to disputes or additional costs if not managed through contract modifications. The fixed-price nature also means less flexibility for the government to adapt to changing needs within the contract period without formal modifications.
How does this contract align with the Department of Energy's overall IT modernization or cybersecurity strategies?
The alignment of this Microsoft Unified Support contract with the Department of Energy's IT modernization or cybersecurity strategies is not explicitly stated in the provided data. However, robust and timely support for core software infrastructure is generally a foundational element for any successful IT strategy. Ensuring that critical Microsoft systems are up-to-date, secure, and well-supported can indirectly contribute to modernization efforts by providing a stable platform. It can also enhance cybersecurity by ensuring timely patching and access to security expertise for Microsoft products. A deeper analysis would require reviewing DOE's strategic IT documents.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9716 ARNON CHAPEL RD, GREAT FALLS, VA, 22066
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $7,038,292
Exercised Options: $7,038,292
Current Obligation: $7,038,292
Actual Outlays: $7,038,292
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NNG15SD34B
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-06-26
Current End Date: 2026-06-25
Potential End Date: 2026-06-25 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-23
More Contracts from Minburn Technology Group, LLC
- Microsoft Licenses — $356.0M (Department of State)
- Ussocom Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for Microsoft License Software Assurance and NEW Licenses — $284.6M (Department of Defense)
- FY23 Usda Ocio Enterprise Solutions POP: 10/1/2022 - 9/30/2023 — $234.7M (Department of Agriculture)
- VA Endpoints - Base Award With Options Exercised AT Award — $229.0M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Microsoft Software Licenses and Support (task Order 00004) — $173.0M (Department of the Treasury)
Other Department of Energy Contracts
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- ,Ct::igf Contract Award De-Na0003525 to the National Technology&engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC (ntess) for the Management and Operation of the Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration's Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) — $41.7B (National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC)
- Management and Operation of the OAK Ridge National Laboratory — $40.8B (Ut-Battelle LLC)
- TAS::89 0240::TAS This Performance-Based Management Contract (pbmc) IS for the Management and Operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (llnl). the Contractor Shall, in Accordance With the Provisions of This Contract, Accomplish the Missions and Programs Assigned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Manage and Operate the Laboratory. the Laboratory IS ONE of Does Office of Defense Program Multi-Program Laboratories. the Laboratory IS a Federally Funded Research and Development Institution (established in Accordance With the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Part 35 and Operated Under This Management and Operating (M&O) Contract, AS Defined in FAR 17.6 and Dear 917.6 — $40.8B (Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC)
- M&O of Lanl BR of U of CA — $35.3B (Regents of the University of California, the)