HUD awards $68.4M to Selene Finance LP for Ginnie Mae MBS servicing, a sole-source contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $68,355,278 ($68.4M)

Contractor: Selene Finance LP

Awarding Agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development

Start Date: 2023-08-12

End Date: 2026-08-11

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $62.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SINGLE FAMILY MASTER SUBSERVICER SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF GINNIE MAE'S MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (MBS) PROGRAMS.

Place of Performance

Location: COPPELL, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75019

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Housing and Urban Development obligated $68.4 million to SELENE FINANCE LP for work described as: SINGLE FAMILY MASTER SUBSERVICER SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF GINNIE MAE'S MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (MBS) PROGRAMS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting potential cost savings from competition. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days suggests a need for stable, long-term servicing capabilities. 3. The use of Time and Materials pricing may lead to cost overruns if not closely managed. 4. The geographic location of the contractor in Texas might influence local economic impact. 5. This contract supports critical functions within Ginnie Mae's Mortgage-Backed Securities programs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and the specialized services provided. The raw dollar amount of $68.4 million over three years for master subserving is significant, but without comparable sole-source contracts or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. The contract's pricing structure (Time and Materials) introduces inherent risk for cost control, which needs diligent oversight to ensure it remains within reasonable bounds compared to industry standards for similar specialized financial services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no open competition. This approach is typically used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when urgency dictates a rapid award. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery and potential cost reductions that typically arise from multiple bidders vying for a contract. This can sometimes lead to higher prices than might be achieved in a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not receive the best possible price for these essential financial services due to the absence of competitive bidding. The government relies on the contractor's proposed pricing and diligent oversight to ensure fair value.

Public Impact

Homeowners with mortgages securitized by Ginnie Mae benefit from continuous and reliable loan servicing. The financial markets benefit from the stability and integrity of the MBS programs facilitated by this contract. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) ensures the smooth operation of its mortgage finance initiatives. The workforce in Texas may see indirect economic benefits through employment opportunities at Selene Finance LP.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The Investment Banking and Securities Intermediation sector involves a wide range of financial services, including the complex management of mortgage-backed securities. Ginnie Mae's programs are a cornerstone of the U.S. housing finance system, and master subservicers play a vital role in their operation. The market for these specialized services is often characterized by a limited number of highly qualified firms. This contract, valued at approximately $68.4 million over three years, fits within the broader landscape of federal support for housing finance and capital markets.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not competed and there is no indication of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements. As a sole-source award to a specific entity, the direct impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely minimal, unless Selene Finance LP itself engages small businesses for subcontracting, which is not specified.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily fall under the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), specifically the agency responsible for Ginnie Mae's operations. As a sole-source award, the justification and terms are critical areas for scrutiny. Transparency regarding the contractor's performance metrics, adherence to the Time and Materials pricing, and overall compliance with program requirements will be key accountability measures. The Inspector General's office within HUD may also have jurisdiction for audits and investigations.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

housing-and-urban-development, department-of-housing-and-urban-development, selene-finance-lp, ginnie-mae, mortgage-backed-securities, master-subservicer, definitive-contract, time-and-materials, sole-source, texas, investment-banking, securities-intermediation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded $68.4 million to SELENE FINANCE LP. SINGLE FAMILY MASTER SUBSERVICER SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF GINNIE MAE'S MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (MBS) PROGRAMS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SELENE FINANCE LP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Housing and Urban Development (Department of Housing and Urban Development).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $68.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-08-12. End: 2026-08-11.

What is the track record of Selene Finance LP in supporting federal mortgage-backed securities programs?

Information regarding Selene Finance LP's specific track record in supporting federal mortgage-backed securities programs, particularly Ginnie Mae's, is not readily available in the provided data. As this is a sole-source award, the justification likely included an assessment of the contractor's capabilities and past performance. Further investigation would be needed to ascertain the depth and breadth of their experience with similar federal programs, including any prior contracts, their performance ratings, and any challenges encountered. Understanding their history with federal agencies, especially HUD, would provide crucial context for evaluating the appropriateness of this sole-source award and the potential risks associated with their performance.

How does the $68.4 million contract value compare to similar master subserving contracts for Ginnie Mae or other federal agencies?

Direct comparison of this $68.4 million contract value to similar master subserving contracts is difficult without access to detailed contract databases and specific service level agreements. However, the duration of three years (1095 days) suggests an average annual value of approximately $22.8 million. This figure needs to be contextualized against the volume of mortgages serviced and the complexity of the tasks involved. Given that Ginnie Mae's MBS programs are substantial, this annual figure might be within a reasonable range for a master subservicers supporting such a large portfolio. However, the lack of competition means there's no direct market benchmark to confirm if this represents optimal value for taxpayers.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source, Time and Materials contract for mortgage servicing?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source, Time and Materials (T&M) contract for mortgage servicing are twofold. Firstly, the sole-source nature eliminates competitive pressure, potentially leading to inflated costs as the government does not benefit from multiple bids. This reduces the incentive for the contractor to offer the most competitive pricing. Secondly, the T&M pricing structure carries inherent risks of cost overruns. Without strict oversight and well-defined task orders, the contractor could incur significant labor hours and material costs that may not be fully justified, leading to expenditures exceeding initial estimates. Effective management and robust oversight are critical to mitigate these risks.

How effective are the oversight mechanisms for sole-source contracts, particularly those using Time and Materials pricing?

The effectiveness of oversight for sole-source, Time and Materials (T&M) contracts heavily relies on the diligence and resources of the contracting agency. For sole-source awards, the initial justification and negotiation process are paramount. Post-award, robust oversight requires continuous monitoring of the contractor's labor hours, material usage, and task completion against the contract's objectives. Agencies must have skilled contract officers and technical monitors who can scrutinize invoices, validate costs, and ensure that the work performed aligns with the necessity and scope defined in the contract. For T&M contracts, this often involves detailed audits and performance reviews to prevent scope creep and ensure fair pricing.

What is the historical spending pattern for Ginnie Mae master subserving services, and how does this contract fit?

Historical spending patterns for Ginnie Mae master subserving services are not detailed in the provided data. However, Ginnie Mae has been a consistent entity within the federal housing finance landscape for decades, implying a continuous need for subserving functions. Contracts for such services are typically long-term and substantial, reflecting the scale of the MBS programs. This $68.4 million contract, awarded to Selene Finance LP, appears to be a continuation or replacement of previous arrangements to ensure the ongoing operational integrity of Ginnie Mae's securitization activities. Understanding the historical spending would involve analyzing past contract awards, durations, and values for similar services to identify trends and potential changes in cost or scope.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Finance and InsuranceSecurities and Commodity Contracts Intermediation and BrokerageInvestment Banking and Securities Intermediation

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3501 OLYMPUS BLVD, DALLAS, TX, 75019

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,128,703,160

Exercised Options: $1,128,703,160

Current Obligation: $68,355,278

Actual Outlays: $8,378,402

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-08-12

Current End Date: 2026-08-11

Potential End Date: 2026-08-11 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-07-24

More Contracts from Selene Finance LP

View all Selene Finance LP federal contracts →

Other Department of Housing and Urban Development Contracts

View all Department of Housing and Urban Development contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending